ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF MECHANIZED TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE PREPARATION OF LIVESTOCK FEED BASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijite.2(54).2026.4480Keywords:
Machine, Food Processing Plants, Technologies, Economic Evaluation, Combined MachinesAbstract
The use of natural forages in Georgia is currently the only priority, namely, from tens of thousands of hectares unsuitable for arable land, it is possible to obtain livestock feed in the form of milk, meat, eggs, wool and honey. Today, much attention is paid to the preparation of roughage and the energy efficiency of machines, the determination of technical and economic indicators for traditional, intensive and high-tech machine complexes. The scientific article discusses the general technical and economic assessment of traditional, intensive and high-tech systems and machine units, in particular, fuel, metal consumption and labor costs. Classifiers of modern machine systems were used to assess the technical and economic indicators of various types of agricultural machinery, and for the purpose of economic assessment, the working schemes of machines for the fundamental and superficial improvement of the species composition of the grass cover are presented. Taking into account the soil conditions of Western Georgia, the economic parameters of individual machine systems were calculated.
References
Reyes-Valenzuela, M., et al. (2022). Economic evaluation of fuel cell-powered off-road machinery using stochastic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(5), 2771–2782.
Malakhov, A. V., & Borisov, A. A. (2021). Efficiency of agricultural machinery: How to integrate traditional and alternative methods of economic evaluation? In The challenge of sustainability in agricultural systems: Volume 2 (pp. 885–895). Springer International Publishing.
Lazarus, W., & Selley, R. (2005). Farm machinery economic cost estimates for late 2005. University of Minnesota Extension Service.
Lazarus, W. F., & Selley, R. (2002). Farm machinery economic cost estimates for 2002. University of Minnesota Extension Service, College of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences.
Subaeva, A. K., & Z., A. A. (2015). Improvement of agricultural machinery economic efficiency. International Business Management, 9(7), 1770–1774.
Dovlatova, G., et al. (2022). Calculation of the economic efficiency of technological machines in the transition to continuous automated processes. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 495–501.
Katsitadze, J., et al. (2017). Improving the reliability of agricultural machinery, using the method of restoration of parts under submerged arc welding, and its technical and economic evaluation. Machines. Technologies. Materials, 11(6), 307–310.
Rodríguez, C. M. T., de la Rosa Jiménez, Y., & Rodríguez, H. V. (2021). Farm machinery for the “Mores Food Program”: Financial economic evaluation of an investment project. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 30(2), 95–103.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Merab Mamuladze, Zaur Phutkaradze, Ioseb Abuladze, Fadiko Abuselidze

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

