WHICH COUNTRIES COULD BECOME EASTERN EUROPE'S "SILICON VALLEY"? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS IN POLAND, ESTONIA, CZECHIA, AND ROMANIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijite.4(56).2026.5984

Keywords:

Innovation Ecosystems, Central and Eastern Europe, Poland, Estonia, Czechia, Romania, Human Capital, Research and Development

Abstract

This study examines the potential for the emergence of a Silicon Valley-style innovation ecosystem in Central and Eastern Europe through a comparative analysis of Poland, Estonia, Czechia, and Romania. Rather than relying on a single indicator or attempting to establish a definitive national ranking, the study adopts a multidimensional perspective that considers institutional quality, research and development capacity, human capital, higher education, tax competitiveness, foreign investment, and geographical and economic conditions. The research employs a theoretical and comparative design based on a review of relevant academic literature and secondary information from international and institutional sources. The comparison highlights distinct development profiles among the selected countries: Estonia demonstrates strengths in institutional quality and innovation performance, Czechia has a strong research and development base, and Poland benefits from its market size and strategic economic position. Romania provides an additional perspective on the opportunities and constraints facing innovation development in the region. The study argues that a Silicon Valley-style ecosystem cannot be explained by any single policy or economic indicator. Instead, its development depends on the interaction of institutions, knowledge creation, skilled human capital, entrepreneurial activity, investment conditions, and the commercialisation of innovation. The findings should be interpreted as a qualitative comparative assessment rather than a causal or exhaustive ranking of national innovation systems.

References

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption perceptions index 2024.

PwC. (2025). Worldwide tax summaries online. PricewaterhouseCoopers.

QS Quacquarelli Symonds. (2025). QS World University Rankings 2025. QS.

Hoefler, D. (1971). Silicon Valley USA. Electronic News.

Tax Foundation. (2025). California tax rates, collections, and burdens.

Wikipedia Contributors. (2025). Silicon Valley. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

Yelp. (2025). Top 10 best colleges & universities near Silicon Valley, California.

Maddison, A. (2003). The world economy: Historical statistics. OECD Publishing.

Davies, N. (2005). God's playground: A history of Poland, volume II: 1795 to the present. Oxford University Press.

Government of Poland. (2025). Start in Poland. Gov.pl.

Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP). (2025). Polish Agency for Enterprise Development. PARP.

Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP). (2025). Startup Booster Poland. PARP.

LexisNexis. (2025). Zero taxation for individuals under 26 years of age in Poland.

Mihali, L. M., Potra, S., Dungan, L. I., Negrea, R., & Cioabla, A. (2022). Spin-off–university relationship. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148328

Trading Economics. (2025). Poland unemployment rate.

Dudkowiak & Kopeć. (2025). Corporate income tax in Poland.

Statistics Poland (GUS). (2024). Economic activity of enterprises with foreign capital in 2022. Statistics Poland.

University of Warsaw. (2025). University of Warsaw.

Statistics Poland (GUS). (2025). Foreigners performing work in Poland in December 2024. Statistics Poland.

Study in Poland. (2025). Ever more foreign students at Polish universities.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Baylarov, R. (2026). WHICH COUNTRIES COULD BECOME EASTERN EUROPE’S "SILICON VALLEY"? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS IN POLAND, ESTONIA, CZECHIA, AND ROMANIA. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 4(56). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijite.4(56).2026.5984