CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4118Keywords:
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Conservative Treatment, Splinting, Physiotherapy, Pharmacotherapy, Corticosteroid InjectionsAbstract
Introduction: The most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb causing pain, paraesthesia and hand dysfunction is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In less advanced stages of the disease, conservative treatment plays a key role as an alternative to surgical treatment or as the first stage of intervention.
Objective: The main objective of this review is summarize and properly evaluate current conservative treatment methods for carpal tunnel syndrome and to compare their clinical effectiveness with surgical treatment.
Methods: A review of the scientific literature was conducted using the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Review articles, clinical studies and meta-analyses on non-surgical treatment, including immobilisation, physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy and corticosteroid injections, were included.
Results: Wrist immobilisation, physiotherapy, pharmacological treatment and corticosteroid injections are the most commonly used conservative methods. In patients with mild or moderate forms of the disease, these methods can significantly reduce symptoms and improve hand function. However, depending on the stage of the disease, the duration of symptoms and comorbidities, their effectiveness varies
Conclusions: Conservative treatment is an effective and less invasive option for patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Individualised therapy based on the severity of clinical symptoms and patient needs, which is in line with current guidelines, achieves the best results.
References
de la Llave-Rincón AI, Puentedura EJ, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Conservative treatment in patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: A literature review. Neurologia. 2017;32(3):160–9. doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.03.015.
Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1273–84. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9.
Schmid AB, Bland JD, Bhat MA, Bennett DL. The relationship between nerve fiber pathology and pain in carpal tunnel syndrome. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 12):3543–59. doi:10.1093/brain/awu326.
Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Current options for nonsurgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(7):1089–96. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01445.x.
Zuo D, Zhou Z, Wang H, Liu B, Wang T, Li T. Management of acute carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review. Front Surg. 2023;10:1105637. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1105637.
Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, van den Brink J, Franke TP, Koes BW, Hoogvliet P. Effectiveness of conservative, surgical, and postsurgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome—A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(7):1292–304. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.022.
Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard N, Smitham P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:69–76. doi:10.2174/1874325001206010069.
Padua L, Di Pasquale A, Pazzaglia C, Liotta G, Librante A, Mondelli M. Systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in relation to clinical severity and comorbidities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2365. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052365.
Piazzini DB, Aprile I, Ferrara PE, Bertolini C, Tonali P, Maggi L, et al. A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(4):299–314. doi:10.1177/0269215507077294.
Marcondes FB, de Jesus Júnior A, Tokarski L, Vieira WHB, Skare TL. Conservative therapeutic management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a literature review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021;79(7):635–43. doi:10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0518.
de-la-Llave-Rincón AI, Puentedura EJ, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Conservative treatment in patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2019;34(7):451–9. doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.07.004.
Álvarez P, Llusá M, Malgosa A, Valero-Cabré A. Use of conservative therapy before and after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):939. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04378-3.
Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo JL, Cea JG. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD001552. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001552.pub3.
Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Franke TP, Randsdorp MS, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments—a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(7):1005–24. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.019.
Shi Q, MacDermid JC. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:17. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-6-17.
Talarczyk J, Mielcarska A, Biernacki P, Maciejewska-Skrendo A. Carpal tunnel syndrome conservative treatment: a literature review. J Health Inequal. 2020;6(2):190–6. doi:10.5114/jhi.2020.102430.
Koca I, Boyaci A, Tutoglu A, Ucar M, Camdeviren H. Effectiveness of conservative treatment according to severity and systemic disease in carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2365. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052365.
Boyaci A, Koca I, Tutoglu A, Ucar M, Camdeviren H. Update on efficacy of conservative treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):950. doi:10.3390/jcm11040950.
Ahn DS, Lee WJ. Local corticosteroid injections versus surgical carpal tunnel release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Life (Basel). 2022;12(4):533. doi:10.3390/life12040533.
Brininger TL, Rogers JC, Holm MB, Baker NA. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11938. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89898-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
