NEW FORMS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF INSULIN THERAPY IN TYPE 1 DIABETES - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4479Keywords:
Insulin, Insulin Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Multiple Daily Injections, Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin InfusionAbstract
Introduction: Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to permanent lack of insulin. In recent years, advances in insulin formulations and delivery methods have improved the ability to mimic natural insulin secretion and support better diabetes management.
Aim: The aim of this article is to review the most commonly used forms of insulin therapy and modern technologies supporting the treatment of type 1 diabetes, with attention to their effectiveness, safety, and impact on patients’ quality of life.
Methods: A search of PubMed and ScienceDirect was performed for publications from January 2008 to June 2025. The review included clinical trials and review articles about insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Titles and abstracts were screened, full texts were analysed, and reference lists of key papers were checked.
Results: Modern insulin therapy is based on insulin analogues with different action profiles and on delivery systems such as insulin pens, pumps, and hybrid closed-loop devices. New basal and prandial analogues help improve glycaemic control and reduce complications. Automated Insulin Delivery systems increase time in range and improve daily functioning. However, problems such as variability of insulin absorption, lipodystrophy, and high costs still remain.
Conclusions: Although progress in insulin therapy has improved diabetes care, further research, better access to modern technologies, and further patient education is essential.
References
Gregory, G. A., Robinson, T. I. G., Linklater, S. E., et al. (2022). Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: A modelling study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 10(10), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00218-2
Ogrotis, I., Koufakis, T., & Kotsa, K. (2023). Changes in the global epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in an evolving landscape of environmental factors: Causes, challenges, and opportunities. Medicina, 59(4), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040668
Sims, E. K., Carr, A. L. J., Oram, R. A., et al. (2021). 100 years of insulin: Celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy. Nature Medicine, 27(7), 1154–1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01418-2
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., et al. (2022). Insulin analogues. In K. R. Feingold, B. Anawalt, A. Boyce et al. (Eds.), Endotext. MDText.com, Inc. (Original work published 2000). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278938/
D’Hondt, N. J. (2008). Continuous intravenous insulin: Ready for prime time. Diabetes Spectrum, 21(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaspect.21.4.255
MSD Manual Professional Edition. (2024). Onset, peak, and duration of action of human insulin preparations. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/multimedia/table/onset-peak-and-duration-of-action-of-human-insulin-preparations
ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., et al. (2025). Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of care in diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Suppl. 1), S181–S206. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S009
Davidson, M. B. (2010). Insulin analogs: What are the clinical implications of structural differences? U.S. Pharmacist, 35(5 Suppl Diabetes), 3–7. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/insulin-analogs-what-are-the-clinical-implications-of-structural-differences
Bode, B. W. (2011). Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties, physicochemical stability, and pump compatibility of three rapid-acting insulin analogues—aspart, lispro, and glulisine. Endocrine Practice, 17(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10260.RA
Wong, E. Y., & Kroon, L. (2021). Ultra-rapid-acting insulins: How fast is really needed? Clinical Diabetes, 39(4), 415-423. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0119
Heise, T., Stender-Petersen, K., Hövelmann, U., et al. (2017). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 56(6), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0473-5
Kazda, C., Leohr, J., Liu, R., et al. (2022). Ultra rapid lispro shows accelerated pharmacokinetics and greater reduction in postprandial glucose versus Humalog in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 24(2), 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14563
Janež, A., Guja, C., Mitrakou, A., et al. (2020). Insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A narrative review. Diabetes Therapy, 11(2), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00743-7
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., et al. (2020). The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices. Endocrine Reviews, 41(5), 733-755. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa015
Bolli, G. B., Riddle, M. C., Bergenstal, R. M., et al. (2015). New insulin glargine 300 U/mL compared with glargine 100 U/mL in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 17(4), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12438
Home, P. D., Bergenstal, R. M., Bolli, G. B., et al. (2015). New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 38(12), 2217–2225. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0249
Joshi, S. R., Singh, G., Marwah, A., et al. (2023). Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25(6), 1589–1606. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15007
King, A., & Poon, K. (2010). Glargine and detemir: Safety and efficacy profiles of the long-acting basal insulin analogs. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, 2, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S7301
Hochberg, I. (2018). Insulin detemir use is associated with higher occurrence of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients with hypoalbuminemia. Diabetes Care, 41(4), e44–e46. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1957
Galasso, S., Facchinetti, A., Bonora, B. M., et al. (2016). Switching from twice-daily glargine or detemir to once-daily degludec improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 26(12), 1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2016.08.002
Bode, B. W., Buse, J. B., Fisher, M., et al. (2013). Insulin degludec improves glycaemic control with lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia risk than insulin glargine. Diabetic Medicine, 30(11), 1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12243
Lane, W., Bailey, T. S., Gerety, G., et al. (2017). Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA, 318(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7115
Argano, C., Priola, L., Manno, F., & Corrao, S. (2024). What is the role of basal weekly insulin in clinical practice? Biomedicines, 12(4), 900. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040900
Pham, D. Q., Andraos, J., & Ayoub, J. (2025). Insulin icodec: A novel once-weekly formulation for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-025-09960-x
Trevisan, R., Conti, M., & Ciardullo, S. (2024). Once-weekly insulins: A promising approach to reduce the treatment burden. Diabetologia, 67(8), 1480–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06158-9
Russell-Jones, D., Babazono, T., Cailleteau, R., et al. (2023). Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec. The Lancet, 402(10413), 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02179-7
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., et al. (2024). Introduction and methodology: Standards of care in diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Suppl. 1), S1–S4. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-SINT
Novo Nordisk. (2024). European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use adopts a positive opinion for once-weekly basal insulin icodec (Awiqli). https://www.novonordisk.com/news-and-media/news-and-ir-materials/news-details.html?id=167035
Bergenstal, R. M., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Wysham, C., et al. (2024). Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa: Design and rationale for the QWINT programme. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 26(8), 3020–3030. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15604
Wireless Life Sciences Alliance. (2025). Efsitora alfa for people with type 1 diabetes. https://wirelesslifesciences.org/2025/05/efsitora-alfa-for-people-with-type-1-diabetes/
Kappes, C. M., Kershner, J. R., Morwick, T. M., & Corrigan, S. M. (2018). Dose accuracy and usability of a new half-unit prefilled insulin pen. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(2), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817736316
Lundgrin, E. L., Kelly, C. A., Bellini, N., Lewis, C., Rafi, E., & Hatipoglu, B. (2025). Diabetes technology trends: A review. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 110(Suppl. 2), S165–S174. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf034
Keyu, G., Jiaqi, L., Liyin, Z., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of CSII vs MDI in type 1 diabetes. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 990281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.990281
Šoupal, J., Petruželková, L., Grunberger, G., et al. (2020). Glycemic outcomes with CGM vs insulin delivery method. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0888
Kanapka, L. G., Wadwa, R. P., Breton, M. D., et al. (2021). Extended use of Control-IQ in children. Diabetes Care, 44(2), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1729
Blauw, H., Onvlee, A. J., Klaassen, M., van Bon, A. C., & DeVries, J. H. (2021). Fully closed loop bihormonal control. Diabetes Care, 44(3), 836–838. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2106
Nitschke, M. J., Hemmingsen, M. H., Nørgaard, H. H., et al. (2025). Transition to automated insulin delivery. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 19(3), 857–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251315184
Gradel, A. K. J., Porsgaard, T., Lykkesfeldt, J., et al. (2018). Factors affecting insulin absorption. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018, 1205121. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1205121
Nosek, L., Coester, H. V., Roepstorff, C., et al. (2014). Glucose-lowering effect of degludec is independent of injection region. Clinical Drug Investigation, 34(9), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-014-0218-x
Mader, J. K., Fornengo, R., Hassoun, A., et al. (2024). Lipohypertrophy and glycemic control. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 26(5), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0491
Herascu, A., Avram, V. F., Gaita, L., et al. (2024). Interventions targeting insulin resistance in T1D. Medicina, 60(12), 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122067
Bjornstad, P. (2015). Insulin sensitivity and complications in type 1 diabetes. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.8
Gautam, A., Gautam, S., Patel, P., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review of inhalation insulin. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389534255
Heinemann, L., & Parkin, C. G. (2018). Viability and utility of inhaled insulin. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018, 4568903. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4568903
van Dijk, P. R., Logtenberg, S. J. J., Gans, R. O. B., Bilo, H. J. G., & Kleefstra, N. (2014). Intraperitoneal insulin infusion. Clinical Endocrinology, 81(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12546
Spaan, N., Teplova, A., Stam, G., Spaan, J., & Lucas, C. (2014). Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion. Acta Diabetologica, 51(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0557-3
Hoeg-Jensen, T., Kruse, T., Brand, C. L., et al. (2024). Glucose-sensitive insulin with attenuation of hypoglycaemia. Nature, 634(8035), 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08042-3
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., et al. (2021). Management of type 1 diabetes in adults. Diabetologia, 64(12), 2609–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05568-3
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2025). Type 1 diabetes in adults: Diagnosis and management (NG17). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17/chapter/Recommendations#insulin-therapy
Polish Diabetes Association. (2025). Clinical recommendations for the management of patients with diabetes—2025. https://ptdiab.pl/zalecenia-ptd/zalecenia-kliniczne-dotyczace-postepowania-u-osob-z-cukrzyca-2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

