NEW FORMS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF INSULIN THERAPY IN TYPE 1 DIABETES - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4479

Keywords:

Insulin, Insulin Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Multiple Daily Injections, Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

Abstract

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to permanent lack of insulin. In recent years, advances in insulin formulations and delivery methods have improved the ability to mimic natural insulin secretion and support better diabetes management.

Aim: The aim of this article is to review the most commonly used forms of insulin therapy and modern technologies supporting the treatment of type 1 diabetes, with attention to their effectiveness, safety, and impact on patients’ quality of life.

Methods: A search of PubMed and ScienceDirect was performed for publications from January 2008 to June 2025. The review included clinical trials and review articles about insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Titles and abstracts were screened, full texts were analysed, and reference lists of key papers were checked.

Results: Modern insulin therapy is based on insulin analogues with different action profiles and on delivery systems such as insulin pens, pumps, and hybrid closed-loop devices. New basal and prandial analogues help improve glycaemic control and reduce complications. Automated Insulin Delivery systems increase time in range and improve daily functioning. However, problems such as variability of insulin absorption, lipodystrophy, and high costs still remain.

Conclusions: Although progress in insulin therapy has improved diabetes care, further research, better access to modern technologies, and further patient education is essential.

Author Biographies

  • Irmina Czerepak, District Hospital Complex in Olesnica, ul. Armii Krajowej 1, 56-400 Olesnica, Poland

     

     

  • Klaudia Zackiewicz, University Clinical Hospital in Bialystok, ul. M. C. Skłodowskiej 24a, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland

     

     

References

Gregory, G. A., Robinson, T. I. G., Linklater, S. E., et al. (2022). Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: A modelling study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 10(10), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00218-2

Ogrotis, I., Koufakis, T., & Kotsa, K. (2023). Changes in the global epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in an evolving landscape of environmental factors: Causes, challenges, and opportunities. Medicina, 59(4), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040668

Sims, E. K., Carr, A. L. J., Oram, R. A., et al. (2021). 100 years of insulin: Celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy. Nature Medicine, 27(7), 1154–1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01418-2

Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., et al. (2022). Insulin analogues. In K. R. Feingold, B. Anawalt, A. Boyce et al. (Eds.), Endotext. MDText.com, Inc. (Original work published 2000). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278938/

D’Hondt, N. J. (2008). Continuous intravenous insulin: Ready for prime time. Diabetes Spectrum, 21(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaspect.21.4.255

MSD Manual Professional Edition. (2024). Onset, peak, and duration of action of human insulin preparations. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/multimedia/table/onset-peak-and-duration-of-action-of-human-insulin-preparations

ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., et al. (2025). Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of care in diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Suppl. 1), S181–S206. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S009

Davidson, M. B. (2010). Insulin analogs: What are the clinical implications of structural differences? U.S. Pharmacist, 35(5 Suppl Diabetes), 3–7. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/insulin-analogs-what-are-the-clinical-implications-of-structural-differences

Bode, B. W. (2011). Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties, physicochemical stability, and pump compatibility of three rapid-acting insulin analogues—aspart, lispro, and glulisine. Endocrine Practice, 17(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10260.RA

Wong, E. Y., & Kroon, L. (2021). Ultra-rapid-acting insulins: How fast is really needed? Clinical Diabetes, 39(4), 415-423. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0119

Heise, T., Stender-Petersen, K., Hövelmann, U., et al. (2017). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 56(6), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0473-5

Kazda, C., Leohr, J., Liu, R., et al. (2022). Ultra rapid lispro shows accelerated pharmacokinetics and greater reduction in postprandial glucose versus Humalog in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 24(2), 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14563

Janež, A., Guja, C., Mitrakou, A., et al. (2020). Insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A narrative review. Diabetes Therapy, 11(2), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00743-7

Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., et al. (2020). The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices. Endocrine Reviews, 41(5), 733-755. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa015

Bolli, G. B., Riddle, M. C., Bergenstal, R. M., et al. (2015). New insulin glargine 300 U/mL compared with glargine 100 U/mL in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 17(4), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12438

Home, P. D., Bergenstal, R. M., Bolli, G. B., et al. (2015). New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 38(12), 2217–2225. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0249

Joshi, S. R., Singh, G., Marwah, A., et al. (2023). Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25(6), 1589–1606. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15007

King, A., & Poon, K. (2010). Glargine and detemir: Safety and efficacy profiles of the long-acting basal insulin analogs. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, 2, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S7301

Hochberg, I. (2018). Insulin detemir use is associated with higher occurrence of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients with hypoalbuminemia. Diabetes Care, 41(4), e44–e46. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1957

Galasso, S., Facchinetti, A., Bonora, B. M., et al. (2016). Switching from twice-daily glargine or detemir to once-daily degludec improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 26(12), 1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2016.08.002

Bode, B. W., Buse, J. B., Fisher, M., et al. (2013). Insulin degludec improves glycaemic control with lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia risk than insulin glargine. Diabetic Medicine, 30(11), 1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12243

Lane, W., Bailey, T. S., Gerety, G., et al. (2017). Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA, 318(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7115

Argano, C., Priola, L., Manno, F., & Corrao, S. (2024). What is the role of basal weekly insulin in clinical practice? Biomedicines, 12(4), 900. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040900

Pham, D. Q., Andraos, J., & Ayoub, J. (2025). Insulin icodec: A novel once-weekly formulation for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-025-09960-x

Trevisan, R., Conti, M., & Ciardullo, S. (2024). Once-weekly insulins: A promising approach to reduce the treatment burden. Diabetologia, 67(8), 1480–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06158-9

Russell-Jones, D., Babazono, T., Cailleteau, R., et al. (2023). Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec. The Lancet, 402(10413), 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02179-7

ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., et al. (2024). Introduction and methodology: Standards of care in diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Suppl. 1), S1–S4. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-SINT

Novo Nordisk. (2024). European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use adopts a positive opinion for once-weekly basal insulin icodec (Awiqli). https://www.novonordisk.com/news-and-media/news-and-ir-materials/news-details.html?id=167035

Bergenstal, R. M., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Wysham, C., et al. (2024). Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa: Design and rationale for the QWINT programme. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 26(8), 3020–3030. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15604

Wireless Life Sciences Alliance. (2025). Efsitora alfa for people with type 1 diabetes. https://wirelesslifesciences.org/2025/05/efsitora-alfa-for-people-with-type-1-diabetes/

Kappes, C. M., Kershner, J. R., Morwick, T. M., & Corrigan, S. M. (2018). Dose accuracy and usability of a new half-unit prefilled insulin pen. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(2), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817736316

Lundgrin, E. L., Kelly, C. A., Bellini, N., Lewis, C., Rafi, E., & Hatipoglu, B. (2025). Diabetes technology trends: A review. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 110(Suppl. 2), S165–S174. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf034

Keyu, G., Jiaqi, L., Liyin, Z., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of CSII vs MDI in type 1 diabetes. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 990281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.990281

Šoupal, J., Petruželková, L., Grunberger, G., et al. (2020). Glycemic outcomes with CGM vs insulin delivery method. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0888

Kanapka, L. G., Wadwa, R. P., Breton, M. D., et al. (2021). Extended use of Control-IQ in children. Diabetes Care, 44(2), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1729

Blauw, H., Onvlee, A. J., Klaassen, M., van Bon, A. C., & DeVries, J. H. (2021). Fully closed loop bihormonal control. Diabetes Care, 44(3), 836–838. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2106

Nitschke, M. J., Hemmingsen, M. H., Nørgaard, H. H., et al. (2025). Transition to automated insulin delivery. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 19(3), 857–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251315184

Gradel, A. K. J., Porsgaard, T., Lykkesfeldt, J., et al. (2018). Factors affecting insulin absorption. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018, 1205121. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1205121

Nosek, L., Coester, H. V., Roepstorff, C., et al. (2014). Glucose-lowering effect of degludec is independent of injection region. Clinical Drug Investigation, 34(9), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-014-0218-x

Mader, J. K., Fornengo, R., Hassoun, A., et al. (2024). Lipohypertrophy and glycemic control. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 26(5), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0491

Herascu, A., Avram, V. F., Gaita, L., et al. (2024). Interventions targeting insulin resistance in T1D. Medicina, 60(12), 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122067

Bjornstad, P. (2015). Insulin sensitivity and complications in type 1 diabetes. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.8

Gautam, A., Gautam, S., Patel, P., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review of inhalation insulin. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389534255

Heinemann, L., & Parkin, C. G. (2018). Viability and utility of inhaled insulin. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018, 4568903. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4568903

van Dijk, P. R., Logtenberg, S. J. J., Gans, R. O. B., Bilo, H. J. G., & Kleefstra, N. (2014). Intraperitoneal insulin infusion. Clinical Endocrinology, 81(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12546

Spaan, N., Teplova, A., Stam, G., Spaan, J., & Lucas, C. (2014). Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion. Acta Diabetologica, 51(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0557-3

Hoeg-Jensen, T., Kruse, T., Brand, C. L., et al. (2024). Glucose-sensitive insulin with attenuation of hypoglycaemia. Nature, 634(8035), 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08042-3

Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., et al. (2021). Management of type 1 diabetes in adults. Diabetologia, 64(12), 2609–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05568-3

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2025). Type 1 diabetes in adults: Diagnosis and management (NG17). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17/chapter/Recommendations#insulin-therapy

Polish Diabetes Association. (2025). Clinical recommendations for the management of patients with diabetes—2025. https://ptdiab.pl/zalecenia-ptd/zalecenia-kliniczne-dotyczace-postepowania-u-osob-z-cukrzyca-2025

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

NEW FORMS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF INSULIN THERAPY IN TYPE 1 DIABETES - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. (2025). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(4(48). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4479

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>