MODERN DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR MANDIBULAR AND MAXILLARY INJURIES - FROM RECONSTRUCTION TO INTERNAL FIXATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4855Keywords:
Mandibular Fractures, Maxillary Fractures, Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures, Facial TraumaAbstract
Background: Injuries of the mandible and maxilla contribute to a large part of maxillofacial trauma, which often require complex diagnostics and therapeutics. Recent developments in imaging, computer-aided design and manufacturing, biomaterials, and reconstructive methods have significantly affected clinical assessment and surgical outcomes.
Methods: This is a review of the evidence from 21 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, sourced through Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and publisher databases. Reconstruction, materials science and complication profiles are part of this series.
Results: Epidemiological trends and diagnostic jigsaw were uniformly emphasised across studies, in which CT, CBCT and 3D reconstruction were considered fundamental. The accuracy of fracture repositioning and reduction during image-guided or navigated surgery was significantly higher. The digital workflows, together with VSP and CAD/CAM drilling guides, enabled an accurate reconstruction of the mandible with improved functional and cosmetic results. Comparative studies demonstrated the superiority of ORIF over closed reduction for both condylar and mandibular fractures with delayed treatment, with a negative impact on functional outcome. Resorbable implants perform well as an alternative to titanium-level fixation systems, with reduced reoperation requirements and acceptable stability profiles.
Conclusion: Modern diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as high-resolution imaging, navigation, VSP, CAD/CAM technology, and bioresorbable fixation techniques, significantly enhance precision, reducing complications and promoting optimal functional rehabilitation with maximum facial symmetry in mandibular and maxillofacial trauma. The current evolution of digital workflows and materials is likely to enhance clinical outcomes.
References
Baecher, H., Hoch, C. C., Knoedler, S., Maheta, B. J., Kauke-Navarro, M., Safi, A. F., Alfertshofer, M., Knoedler, L., et al. (2023). From bench to bedside: Current clinical and translational challenges in fibula free flap reconstruction. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1246690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1246690
Bănărescu, M., Cavalcante, B. G. N., Ács, M., Szabó, B., Harnos, A., Hegyi, P., Varga, G., Costan, V. V., Gerber, G., et al. (2025). Intraoperative surgical navigation is as effective as conventional surgery for zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture reduction. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(4), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051589
Borrás-Ferreres, J., Sánchez-Torres, A., & Gay-Escoda, C. (2018). Bifid mandibular condyles: A systematic review. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 23(6), e672–e680. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22681
Chocron, Y., Azzi, A. J., Cugno, S., et al. (2023). Resorbable implants for mandibular fracture fixation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002384
Coppen, C., van Rijssel, T. J. J., Maal, T. J. J., Dik, E. A., Verhoeven, T., Snoeijink, T. J., Weijs, W. L. J., Verhulst, A., et al. (2025). Fibula free flap reconstruction: Improving accuracy of virtual surgical planning using titanium inserts. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 54(11), 1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.12.017
Kambalimath, D. H., Kambalimath, H. V., Satyanarayan, M. V. V., Kumar, A. V., Ravikumar, T. G., & Deepak, R. M. (2016). Retrospective analysis of management of zygomatic complex fractures. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 36(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/26323273231172739
Gutierrez, D. A. F., Hidalgo, J. R. F., Ramírez, Y. A. C., & Peralta, D. B. G. (2024). Impact of image-guided surgical techniques in complex bone reconstruction for maxillofacial fractures. Iberoamerican Journal of Health Research. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberojhr.v4is.678
Raghoebar, I. I., Rozema, F. R., de Lange, J., & Dubois, L. (2014). Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: Effect of fixation on repositioning and stability—A systematic review. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 7(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006
Kasrija, R., Gupta, H., Mittal, T., Dang, M., Behl, R., Kumar, M., Gupta, S., et al. (2020). Two-point versus three-point fixation in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A narrative review. World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 9(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85659
Khayat, S., Sada Urmeneta, Á., González Moure, B., Fernández Acosta, D., Benito Anguita, M., López López, A., Verdaguer Martín, J. J., Navarro Cuéllar, I., Falahat, F., Navarro Cuéllar, C., et al. (2024). Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects with double-barrel fibula flap and osseointegrated implants: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(2), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020471
Kostares, E., Kostare, G., Kostares, M., Kantzanou, M., et al. (2023). Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13, 11174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37652-6
Krasovsky, A., Hija, A., Zeineh, N., Bilder, A., Emodi, O., Rachmiel, A., Shilo, D., et al. (2024). Three-dimensional secondary reconstruction of mistreated zygomatic fractures using patient-specific surgical guides and implants. Frontiers in Oral Health, 5, 1343068. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1464012
Panesar, K., & Susarla, S. M. (2021). Mandibular fractures: Diagnosis and management. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 35(4), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735818
Petronis, Ž., Spaicytė, N., Sakalys, D., & Janužis, G. (2022). Functional rehabilitation after mandibular fracture: A systematic review. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_99_22
Probst, F. A., Liokatis, P., Mast, G., Ehrenfeld, M., et al. (2020). Virtual planning for mandible resection and reconstruction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(11), 1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2021-0045
Rahbin, S., Sunnergren, O., McBride, E., Darabi, H., & Alinasab, B. (2024). Does more invasive surgery result in higher patient satisfaction? A long-term follow-up of 136 zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 17(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241286544
Sanino Zavala, I., Carrazana Díaz, M., Fuentes Fernández, D., Guzmán Aguilera, V., & Quitral Argandoña, R. (2024). Resorbable osteosynthesis in mandibular fractures: An exploratory systematic review. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences, 26(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.60451
Shobha, E. S., Nainoor, N., Prashanth, N. T., Rangan, V., Malick, R., Shetty, S., et al. (2024). Comparative evaluation of open reduction with internal fixation versus closed reduction methods for condylar fracture management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02125-4
Stone, N., Corneman, A., Sandre, A. R., Farrokhyar, F., Thoma, A., Cooper, M. J., et al. (2022). Treatment delay impact on open reduction internal fixation of mandibular fractures: A systematic review. Cureus, 14(10), e30161. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001829
Sulistyani, L. D., Julia, V., Noviantika, D., Irfan, I., Muskab, M., & Kawisana, P. G. (2022). Evaluation of neuro-sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve after ORIF procedure in mandibular fracture: A systematic review. Journal of Stomatology, 75(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2022.117413
Weitz, J., Grabenhorst, A., Singer, H., Niu, M., Grill, F. D., Kamreh, D., Claßen, C. A. S., Wolff, K. D., Ritschl, L. M., et al. (2023). Mandibular reconstructions with free fibula flap using standardized partially adjustable cutting guides or CAD/CAM technique: A 3D and 2D comparison. Frontiers in Oncology, 13, 1167071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1167071
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksnadra Korżel, Ewelina Roksana Wojna, Karolina Górowska, Gabriela Ragan, Patrycja Anita Kobrzyńska, Jędrzej Mogilany, Julia Niedźwiecka, Kamil Źródłowski

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

