THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL COGNITIVE REHABILITATION TOOLS ON THE SOCIAL INTEGRATION OF PEOPLE WITH BRAIN INJURIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4945Keywords:
Brain Injury, Digital Cognitive Rehabilitation, Virtual Reality, Social IntegrationAbstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health concern, frequently resulting in persistent cognitive impairments that limit social integration and quality of life. Social integration—defined as meaningful participation in interpersonal relationships, employment, and community life—is strongly influenced by deficits in memory, attention, executive functioning, and social cognition. While traditional cognitive rehabilitation has demonstrated clinical benefits, its accessibility and long-term sustainability are often constrained by cost, resource demands, and reliance on in-person delivery. In recent years, digital cognitive rehabilitation tools, including mobile applications, virtual reality (VR), and tele-rehabilitation platforms, have emerged as promising alternatives that enable scalable, adaptive, and home-based interventions.
This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the impact of digital cognitive rehabilitation on social integration following TBI, with attention to clinical outcomes, socio-economic implications, and technological barriers. Findings suggest that digital interventions are effective in improving core cognitive domains and may indirectly enhance social functioning by supporting communication, self-efficacy, motivation, and participation in daily activities. VR-based approaches, in particular, offer ecologically valid environments that facilitate the transfer of cognitive gains to real-world social contexts. Economic evidence indicates that digital rehabilitation is often cost-effective or cost-saving, reducing healthcare system burden and supporting return-to-work outcomes.
However, direct evidence linking digital cognitive rehabilitation to measurable social integration outcomes remains limited, and significant barriers persist related to digital access, usability, literacy, and ethical considerations. Future research should prioritize participation-level outcomes, long-term follow-up, and inclusive implementation strategies to maximize the social and societal benefits of digital rehabilitation after brain injury.
References
Baffert, S., Hadouiri, N., Fabron, C., Burgy, F., Cassany, A., & Kemoun, G. (2023). Economic Evaluation of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review of Cost-Utility Studies. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 10, e47172. https://doi.org/10.2196/47172
Brennan, D. M., Mawson, S., & Brownsell, S. (2009). Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform, 145, 231-248.
Calabrò, R. S., Bonanno, M., Torregrossa, W., Cacciante, L., Celesti, A., Rifici, C.,…Quartarone, A. (2023). Benefits of Telerehabilitation for Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Promising Results From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Using Nonimmersive Virtual Reality [Original Paper]. J Med Internet Res, 25, e45458. https://doi.org/10.2196/45458
Cha, S.-M. (2024). Mobile Application Applied for Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Life, 14(7), 891.
Chen, J., Jin, W., Zhang, X. X., Xu, W., Liu, X. N., & Ren, C. C. (2015). Telerehabilitation Approaches for Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 24(12), 2660-2668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014
Chi, K., Chen, J., Zhou, S., & Han, Z. (2025). The effectiveness of digital cognitive intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol, 16, 1651443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1651443
Cicerone, K. D. (2004). Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 19(6), 494-501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200411000-00006
Del Pino, R., Díez-Cirarda, M., Ustarroz-Aguirre, I., Gonzalez-Larragan, S., Caprino, M., Busnatu, S.,…Gómez-Esteban, J. C. (2022). Costs and effects of telerehabilitation in neurological and cardiological diseases: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne), 9, 832229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.832229
Dewan, M. C., Rattani, A., Gupta, S., Baticulon, R. E., Hung, Y.-C., Punchak, M.,…Park, K. B. (2019). Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 130(4), 1080-1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352
Dikmen, S. S., Corrigan, J. D., Levin, H. S., Machamer, J., Stiers, W., & Weisskopf, M. G. (2009). Cognitive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(6), 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c133e9
Elbogen, E. B., Dennis, P. A., Van Voorhees, E. E., Blakey, S. M., Johnson, J. L., Johnson, S. C.,…Belger, A. (2019). Cognitive Rehabilitation With Mobile Technology and Social Support for Veterans With TBI and PTSD: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 34(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000000435
Estebanez-Pérez, M. J., Pastora-Estebanez, P., Vinolo-Gil, M. J., Valero, R. M., & Pastora-Bernal, J. M. (2026). TELE-ASSESSMENT COMPARED WITH IN-PERSON ASSESSMENT IN STROKE PATIENTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND METANALYSIS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.030
Fernández, E., Bringas, M. L., Salazar, S., Rodríguez, D., García, M. E., & Torres, M. (2012). Clinical impact of RehaCom software for cognitive rehabilitation of patients with acquired brain injury. MEDICC Rev, 14(4), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.37757/mr2012v14.n4.8
Gandolfi, M., Landi, S., Sandri, A., Di Vico, I. A., Geroin, C., Menaspà, Z.,…Leardini, C. (2026). Clinical outcomes and economic impact of a digital telemedicine intervention in patients with functional motor disorders: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 97(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-336437
Gao, Y., Ma, L., Lin, C., Zhu, S., Yao, L., Fan, H.,…Wang, T. (2021). Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Intervention on Cognition, Motor Function, Mood, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [Systematic Review]. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Volume 13 - 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.766525
Goldschmitt, M., Gleim, P., Mandelartz, S., Kellmeyer, P., & Rigotti, T. (2025). Digitalizing informed consent in healthcare: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res, 25(1), 893. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12964-7
Grigorovich, A., Xi, M., Lam, N., Pakosh, M., & Chan, B. C. F. (2022). A systematic review of economic analyses of home-based telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil, 44(26), 8188-8200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.2019327
Hardy, J. L., Nelson, R. A., Thomason, M. E., Sternberg, D. A., Katovich, K., Farzin, F., & Scanlon, M. (2015). Enhancing Cognitive Abilities with Comprehensive Training: A Large, Online, Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial. PLoS One, 10(9), e0134467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134467
Henni, S. H., Maurud, S., Fuglerud, K. S., & Moen, A. (2022). The experiences, needs and barriers of people with impairments related to usability and accessibility of digital health solutions, levels of involvement in the design process and strategies for participatory and universal design: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12393-1
Hepburn, J., Williams, L., & McCann, L. (2025). Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption Among Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: Updated Systematic Review [Review]. JMIR Aging, 8, e80000. https://doi.org/10.2196/80000
Jabin, M. S. R., Mirza, A., Ilodibe, A., Eldabi, T., & Vann Yaroson, E. (2025). Ethical and Quality of Care-Related Challenges of Digital Health Twins in Care Settings for Older Adults: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging, 8, e73925. https://doi.org/10.2196/73925
Jiao, D. (2025). AI-enhanced digital therapeutics for cognitive impairment: integrating mobile applications, virtual reality, and wearable devices. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00325-6
Laver, K. E., Adey‐Wakeling, Z., Crotty, M., Lannin, N. A., George, S., & Sherrington, C. (2020). Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
Lu, J., Rasmussen, M. S., Sigurdardottir, S., Forslund, M. V., Howe, E. I., Fure, S. C. R.,…Andelic, N. (2023). Community Integration and Associated Factors 10 Years after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020405
Lumsden, J., Edwards, E. A., Lawrence, N. S., Coyle, D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy. JMIR Serious Games, 4(2), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.5888
Madeira, R., Esteves, D., Pinto, N., Vercelli, A., & Pato, M. V. (2025). Acceptance Factors and Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Interventions in Older People with Dementia and/or Their Caregivers: An Umbrella Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(22), 7974.
Maggio, M. G., De Luca, R., Molonia, F., Porcari, B., Destro, M., Casella, C.,…Calabro, R. S. (2019). Cognitive rehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injury: A narrative review on the emerging use of virtual reality. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 61, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.12.020
Morton, M. V., & Wehman, P. (1995). Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendations. Brain Inj, 9(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059509004574
Ownsworth, T., & McKenna, K. (2004). Investigation of factors related to employment outcome following traumatic brain injury: a critical review and conceptual model. Disabil Rehabil, 26(13), 765-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001696700
Parsons, T. D. (2015). Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences. Front Hum Neurosci, 9, 660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660
Perez-Marcos, D., Chevalley, O., Schmidlin, T., Garipelli, G., Serino, A., Vuadens, P.,…Millán, J. d. R. (2017). Increasing upper limb training intensity in chronic stroke using embodied virtual reality: a pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0328-9
Rabinowitz, A. R., & Levin, H. S. (2014). Cognitive Sequelae of Traumatic Brain Injury. Psychiatric Clinics, 37(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004
Rizzo, A. S., & Koenig, S. T. (2017). Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology, 31(8), 877-899. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000405
Rodríguez-Rajo, P., Leno Colorado, D., Enseñat-Cantallops, A., & García-Molina, A. (2022). Rehabilitation of social cognition impairment after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurologia (Engl Ed), 37(9), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.07.013
Shambushankar, A. K., Jose, J., Gnanasekaran, S., & Kaur, G. (2025). Cost-Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Compared to Traditional In-Person Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 17(2), e79028. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79028
Wilson, J., Heinsch, M., Betts, D., Booth, D., & Kay-Lambkin, F. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1556. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w
Zhang, M., Wang, E., Shan, H., & Zhu, S. (2025). Efficacy Evaluation of Virtual Reality in Cognitive and Psychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 21, 1455-1468. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s525279
Zhou, C., Ai, Y., Wang, S., Yuan, Y., Zhang, A., Hu, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to participation in electronic health interventions in older adults with cognitive impairment: an umbrella review. BMC Geriatr, 24(1), 1037. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05645-3
Álvarez-Aguado, I., Vega Córdova, V., Muñoz La Rivera, F., González-Carrasco, F., Roselló-Peñaloza, M., Espinosa Parra, F.,…Aguado, L. (2025). Exploring technology use among older adults with intellectual disabilities: barriers, opportunities, and the role of advanced technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 20(7), 2249-2260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2498566
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miszela Kałachurska, Martyna Rożek, Constancia Esther Guy, Maria Nowakowska, Aleksandra Lisowska, Bartosz Nowak, Oliwia Jerzyńska, Maria Sierant, Aleksandra Kowalewska-Kurek, Mateusz Gural
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
