STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF LEADERSHIP AND WHISTLEBLOWING FOR FRAUD DISCLOSURE

Authors

  • Santy Setiawan Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-114X
  • Ming Kuang Tan Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia
  • Imelda Junita Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia
  • Nelsi Cerdik Intan Bate'e Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5048

Keywords:

Fraud, Leadership, Whistleblowing

Abstract

Fraud remains a concern due to the prevalence of fraudulent or corrupt practices in Indonesia. Fraud can be caused by pressure, opportunity, and rationalization, known as the fraud triangle. Fraud in a company can often be uncovered by individuals who become aware of violations and report them, a phenomenon known as whistleblowing. However, individuals who dare to reveal fraud certainly need protection from the company. Therefore, the role of company leaders who can provide protection is crucial. This study aims to examine students' perspectives on the importance of leadership and whistleblowing in disclosing fraud. This study used quantitative methods with a sample of students from various universities in Bandung. The results indicate that leadership influences fraud disclosure, while whistleblowing does not. This finding implies that protection for whistleblowers in disclosing fraud in companies still needs to be strengthened.

References

Arenas, F. J. (2019). A casebook of transformational and transactional leadership. Taylor & Francis.

Arrens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (16th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Artada, Y. (2023, August 2). Pupuk Indonesia perkuat whistleblowing system dengan gandeng KPK dan LPSK. JPNN.com. https://www.jpnn.com/news/pupuk-indonesia-perkuat-whistleblowing-system-dengan-gandeng-kpk-dan-lpsk?page=2

Budiutami, & Apriliyanti. (2021). The role of individual and situational factors to whistleblowing in public sectors. Contemporary Research on Business and Management, 106–109.

Demirtas, O., & Karaca, M. (2020). A handbook of leadership styles. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ghozali, I. (2008). Desain penelitian eksperimental. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Irwandi, S. A., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Buku ajar audit investigatif. PT Nasya Expanding Management.

Kenny, K. (2019). Whistleblowing: Toward a new theory. Harvard University Press.

Kohn, S. M. (2023). Rules for whistleblowers: A handbook for doing what's right. The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.

Kratcoski, P. C., & Edelbacher, M. (2018). Fraud and corruption: Major types, prevention, and control. Springer.

Nahartyo, E. (2013). Desain dan implementasi riset eksperimen. UPP STIM YKPN.

Petrucelli, J. R. (2013). Detecting fraud in organizations: Techniques, tools, and resources. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Purwati, A., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2025). Pengaruh whistleblowing system, moralitas pegawai, dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap pencegahan kecurangan. Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen dan Akuntansi (PERMANA), 17(1), 83–117.

Santoro, D., & Kumar, M. (2018). Speaking truth to power: A theory of whisleblowing. Springer.

Sustika, A. D., Utami, I., & Hapsari, A. N. S. (2020). Whistleblowing for fraud: Perspective of leadership and accountability pressure. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 161–170.

Ubah, M. (2016). The alphabet of leadership: The A–Z of improving your leadership effectiveness. Patridge Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Setiawan, S., Tan, M. K., Junita, I., & Bate'e, N. C. I. (2026). STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF LEADERSHIP AND WHISTLEBLOWING FOR FRAUD DISCLOSURE. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 5(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5048