SPINAL CORD STIMULATION (SCS): TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5129Keywords:
Spinal Cord Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain, High-Frequency Stimulation, Pain ManagementAbstract
Introduction and purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established implantable neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain. Over the last decade, the field has evolved rapidly due to the diversification of stimulation waveforms, expanded programming capabilities, and the emergence of data-driven paradigms such as ECAP-controlled closed-loop systems. This review aims to present SCS as a medico-technical system by summarizing key mechanisms of neuromodulation, core elements of system architecture, clinical indications and selection principles, and technological directions.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, BioMed Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies on spinal cord stimulation. The search included the following keywords and their combinations: spinal cord stimulation, SCS, neuromodulation, chronic pain, failed back surgery syndrome, and complex regional pain syndrome.
Results: Evidence supports that SCS analgesia arises from both segmental spinal mechanisms and supraspinal modulation, with waveform-dependent differences in sensory and affective pain processing. Modern SCS platforms integrate leads, IPG, and telemetry/programming layers, enabling multipolar field shaping and increasingly incorporating sensing channels for objective biomarkers (e.g., ECAP) and real-time dose stabilization. Indications remain centered on PSPS/FBSS and CRPS, with expanding applications across selected neuropathic pain syndromes.
Conclusion: SCS is transitioning from conventional open-loop neuromodulation toward biomarker-driven, adaptive, and remotely supported therapy. Future progress is likely to be shaped by closed-loop architectures, improved sensing and telemetry, and computational approaches enabling more consistent outcomes and scalable personalization.
References
Stubhaug, A., Hansen, J. L., Hallberg, S., Gustavsson, A., Eggen, A. E., & Nielsen, C. S. (2024). The costs of chronic pain: Long-term estimates. European Journal of Pain, 28(6), 960–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2234
Wahezi, S. E., Caparo, M. A., Malhotra, R., Sundaram, L., Batti, K., Ejindu, P., Veeramachaneni, R., Anitescu, M., Hunter, C. W., Naeimi, T., Farah, F., & Kohan, L. (2024). Current waveforms in spinal cord stimulation and their impact on the future of neuromodulation: A scoping review. Neuromodulation, 27(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2023.11.002
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150(3699), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971
Cui, J. G., O’Connor, W. T., Ungerstedt, U., Linderoth, B., & Meyerson, B. A. (1997). Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GABAergic mechanism. Pain, 73(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00077-8
Jensen, M. P., & Brownstone, R. M. (2019). Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of pain: Still in the dark after 50 years. European Journal of Pain, 23(4), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1336
Joosten, E. A., & Franken, G. (2020). Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: Mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms. Pain, 161(Suppl. 1), S104–S113. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001854
Caylor, J., Reddy, R., Yin, S., Cui, C., Huang, M., Huang, C., Ramesh, R., Baker, D. G., Simmons, A., Souza, D., Narouze, S., Vallejo, R., & Lerman, I. (2019). Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: Evidence and theory for mechanisms of action. Bioelectronic Medicine, 5, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-019-0023-1
Vlachou, C., Sarridou, D., Grosomanidis, V., Voulgaris, I., Argiriadou, H., & Amaniti, A. (2025). Spinal cord stimulation: Mechanisms of action, indications, types, complications. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), Article 8615. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238615
Sagalajev, B., Zhang, T., Abdollahi, N., Yousefpour, N., Medlock, L., Al-Basha, D., Ribeiro-da-Silva, A., Esteller, R., Ratté, S., & Prescott, S. A. (2024). Absence of paresthesia during high-rate spinal cord stimulation reveals importance of synchrony for sensations evoked by electrical stimulation. Neuron, 112(3), 404–420.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.10.021
Chakravarthy, K., Fishman, M. A., Zuidema, X., Hunter, C. W., & Levy, R. (2019). Mechanism of action in burst spinal cord stimulation: Review and recent advances. Pain Medicine, 20(Suppl. 1), S13–S22. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz073
Nijhuis, H., Kallewaard, J. W., van de Minkelis, J., Hofsté, W. J., Elzinga, L., Armstrong, P., Gültuna, I., Almac, E., Baranidharan, G., Nikolic, S., Gulve, A., Vesper, J., Dietz, B. E., Mugan, D., & Huygen, F. J. P. M. (2024). Durability of evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled, closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a real-world European chronic pain population. Pain and Therapy, 13(5), 1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00628-z
Falowski, S., Ali, R., Sweet, J., Mackel, C., Kesarwani, R., Arle, J., Larkin, M. B., Pinckard-Dover, H. N., Stone, L., Nerison, C., Ben Haim, S., Rosenow, J., Viswanathan, A., Petersen, E., Lad, N., Schwalb, J., & Raslan, A. (2026). Technical and clinical overview: Spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation, 29(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.07.012
Gola, M., Sztajura, J., & Laskowski, M. (2025). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a method of pain treatment: History, present and future. Anestezjologia i Ratownictwo, 19(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.53139/AIR.20251924
Staats, P., Deer, T. R., Hunter, C., Li, S., Dickerson, D., Petersen, E., Kapural, L., Durbhakula, S., Gilligan, C., Slavin, K. V., Pope, J., Amirdelfan, K., Poree, L., Naidu, R., & Levy, R. M. (2023). Remote management of spinal cord stimulation devices for chronic pain: Expert recommendations on best practices for proper utilization and future considerations. Neuromodulation, 26(7), 1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.003
Bendersky, D., & Yampolsky, C. (2014). Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of its complications. World Neurosurgery, 82(6), 1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.012
Versantvoort, E. M., Dietz, B. E., Mugan, D., Vuong, Q. C., Luli, S., & Obara, I. (2024). Evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation in an experimental model of neuropathic pain in rats. Bioelectronic Medicine, 10(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-023-00134-1
Lam, C. M., Latif, U., Sack, A., Govindan, S., Sanderson, M., Vu, D. T., Smith, G., Sayed, D., & Khan, T. (2023). Advances in spinal cord stimulation. Bioengineering, 10(2), Article 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020185
Peeters, J.-B., & Raftopoulos, C. (2020). Tonic, burst, high-density, and 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation: Efficiency and patients’ preferences in a failed back surgery syndrome predominant population. Review of literature. World Neurosurgery, 144, e331–e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.128
Kapural, L., Yu, C., Doust, M. W., Gliner, B. E., Vallejo, R., Sitzman, B. T., Amirdelfan, K., Morgan, D. M., Brown, L. L., Yearwood, T. L., Bundschu, R., Burton, A. W., Yang, T., Benyamin, R., & Burgher, A. H. (2015). Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: The SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 123(4), 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774
De Ridder, D., Vanneste, S., Plazier, M., & Vancamp, T. (2015). Mimicking the brain: Evaluation of St Jude Medical’s Prodigy Chronic Pain System with Burst Technology. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 12(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2015.985652
De Ridder, D., Vanneste, S., Plazier, M., & Vancamp, T. (2015). Mimicking the brain: Evaluation of St Jude Medical’s Prodigy Chronic Pain System with Burst Technology. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 12(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2015.985652
Fishman, M., Cordner, H., Justiz, R., Provenzano, D., Merrell, C., Shah, B., Naranjo, J., Kim, P., Calodney, A., Carlson, J., Bundschu, R., Sanapati, M., Mangal, V., & Vallejo, R. (2021). Twelve-month results from multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and traditional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic intractable back pain and leg pain. Pain Practice, 21(8), 912–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13066
Smith, W. J., Cedeño, D. L., Thomas, S. M., Kelley, C. A., Vetri, F., & Vallejo, R. (2021). Modulation of microglial activation states by spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain: Comparing high rate, low rate, and differential target multiplexed programming. Molecular Pain, 17, 1744806921999013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806921999013
Vallejo, R., Kelley, C. A., Gupta, A., Smith, W. J., Vallejo, A., & Cedeño, D. L. (2020). Modulation of neuroglial interactions using differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Molecular Pain, 16, 1744806920918057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806920918057
Anaya, C. J., Zander, H. J., Graham, R. D., Sankarasubramanian, V., & Lempka, S. F. (2020). Evoked potentials recorded from the spinal cord during neurostimulation for pain: A computational modeling study. Neuromodulation, 23(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12965
Mangano, N., Torpey, A., Devitt, C., Wen, G. A., Doh, C., & Gupta, A. (2025). Closed-loop spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain management: Mechanisms, clinical evidence, and emerging perspectives. Biomedicines, 13(5), Article 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051091
Fishman, M. A., Antony, A., Esposito, M., Deer, T., & Levy, R. (2019). The evolution of neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pain: Forward-looking perspectives. Pain Medicine, 20(Suppl. 1), S58–S68. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz074
Chakravarthy, K., Bink, H., & Dinsmoor, D. (2020). Sensing evoked compound action potentials from the spinal cord: Novel preclinical and clinical considerations for the pain management researcher and clinician. Journal of Pain Research, 13, 3269–3279. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S289098
Mekhail, N., Levy, R. M., Deer, T. R., Kapural, L., Li, S., Amirdelfan, K., Hunter, C. W., Rosen, S. M., Costandi, S. J., Falowski, S. M., Burgher, A. H., Pope, J. E., Gilmore, C. A., Qureshi, F. A., Staats, P. S., Scowcroft, J., Carlson, J., Kim, C. K., Yang, M. I., Stauss, T., … Evoke Study Group. (2020). Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology, 19(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4
Dua, A., Collier, S. A., Garcia, K., & Kumar, S. (2025). Spinal cord stimulation. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
LeDoux, M. S., & Langford, K. H. (1993). Spinal cord stimulation for the failed back syndrome. Spine, 18(2), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199302000-00004
Visnjevac, O., Costandi, S., Patel, B. A., Azer, G., Agarwal, P., Bolash, R., & Mekhail, N. A. (2017). A comprehensive outcome-specific review of the use of spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Practice, 17(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12513
Tapias Pérez, J. H. (2022). Spinal cord stimulation: Beyond pain management. Neurologia, 37(7), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.05.007
Beletsky, A., Liu, C., Vickery, K., Winston, N., Loomba, M., Gabriel, R. A., & Chen, J. (2023). Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement: Examining outcomes between the open and percutaneous approach. Neuromodulation, 26(5), 1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.010
Malige, A., & Sokunbi, G. (2019). Spinal cord stimulators: A comparison of the trial period versus permanent outcomes. Spine, 44(11), E687–E692. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002921
Stegelmann, S. D., Rahmani, R., Yim, J. M., & Ahammad, Z. (2024). Placement of spinal cord stimulation paddle leads in the thoracic spine using en bloc laminoplasty: A technical note. World Neurosurgery: X, 24, Article 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100400
Kleiber, J. C., Marlier, B., Bannwarth, M., Theret, E., Peruzzi, P., & Litre, F. (2016). Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of 13 years of implantations and complications. Revue Neurologique, 172(11), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2016.09.003
Garg, I., & Wang, D. (2023). Complications of spinal cord stimulator trials and implants: A review. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 27(12), 837–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01190-7
Ho, J. S., Glicksman, M., Kang, K., Zhang, E. X., Phung, A. T., Thérond, A., Fonseca, A. C., Bulat, E., Schatman, M. E., Kaye, A. D., Hasoon, J., Yazdi, C., Gill, J., Ruan, Q., Robinson, C. L., & Simopoulos, T. (2024). Spinal cord stimulator complication rates: A single-institution, 22-year study (1999–2021). Pain Physician, 27(8), E909–E917.
Hasoon, J., Vu, P. D., Mousa, B., Markaryan, A. R., Sarwary, Z. B., Pinkhasova, D., Chen, G. H., Gul, F., Robinson, C. L., Simopoulos, T. T., Gill, J., & Viswanath, O. (2024). Device-related complications associated with cylindrical lead spinal cord stimulator implants: A comprehensive review. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 28(9), 941–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01280-0
Mata, R., Diaz, C., & Diaz, L. (2024). Outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: Complications, failures, and response rate to reprogramming [Conference abstract]. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 27(7, Suppl.), S33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.06.066
Mehta, V., Munglani, R., Eyre, G., Bajaj, G., Abd-Elsayed, A., & Poply, K. (2025). Consenting for spinal cord stimulation: The pitfalls and solution. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 29(1), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01349-w
Denison, T., & Morrell, M. J. (2022). Neuromodulation in 2035: The neurology future forecasting series. Neurology, 98(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013061
Pope, J. E., Deer, T. R., Sayed, D., Antony, A. B., Bhandal, H. S., Calodney, A. K., Chakravarthy, K., Costandi, S., Diep, J., Durbhakula, S., Fishman, M. A., Gilligan, C., Goree, J. H., Guirguis, M., Hagedorn, J. M., Hunter, C. W., Kallewaard, J. W., Kapural, L., Lam, C. M., Li, S., Mayrsohn, B., Nijhuis, H., Nikolic, S., Petersen, E. A., Poree, L. R., Puri, S. K., Reece, D. E., Rosen, S. M., Russo, M. A., Shah, J. M., Staats, P. S., Verrills, P., Vu, C. M., Levy, R. M., & Mekhail, N. (2025). The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) guidelines and consensus on the definition, current evidence, clinical use and future applications for physiologic closed-loop controlled neuromodulation in chronic pain: A NEURON group project. Journal of Pain Research, 18, 531–551. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S475527
Gazzeri, R., Mosca, J., Occhigrossi, F., Mercieri, M., Galarza, M., & Leoni, M. L. G. (2025). Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: Current status and future perspectives, a narrative review. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 12(1), Article 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12010033
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Wilanowska, Jędrzej Sztajura, Wiktoria Mikulska, Kamila Tasior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
