THE VAGINAL AND ENDOMETRIAL MICROBIOME IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5262

Keywords:

Infertility, Vaginal Microbiome, Endometrial Microbiome, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Immune Modulation

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects a substantial proportion of the global population, and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) do not guarantee success. Increasing evidence suggests that the vaginal and endometrial microbiomes play a critical role in female reproductive health, influencing implantation, pregnancy maintenance, and ART outcomes.

Objective: This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on the composition of the vaginal and endometrial microbiota and to explore biological mechanisms linking microbial profiles with reproductive success in ART.

Materials and Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of published literature was conducted, focusing on studies evaluating vaginal and endometrial microbiota composition, associated immunological and metabolic mechanisms, and reproductive outcomes in natural conception and ART cycles.

Results: In healthy reproductive-age women, a Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal and endometrial microbiome is associated with enhanced immune tolerance, epithelial barrier integrity, and metabolic activity supporting endometrial receptivity. Lactobacilli regulate local immune responses via anti-inflammatory cytokine signaling, modulation of pattern recognition receptor pathways, and production of metabolites involved in prostaglandin synthesis, angiogenesis, and uterine contractility. In contrast, dysbiotic communities enriched in non-Lactobacillus taxa are linked to increased pro-inflammatory signaling, impaired decidualization, mucosal barrier disruption, and altered immune cell balance. Clinical studies consistently report higher implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates in women with Lactobacillus-dominant microbiota; however, methodological heterogeneity limits causal interpretation. Emerging microbiome-modulating interventions, including probiotics, antibiotics, and vaginal microbiota transplantation, show potential but remain experimental.

Conclusions: A Lactobacillus-dominant reproductive tract microbiome appears strongly associated with improved ART outcomes. Standardized prospective and interventional studies are needed to establish clinically relevant microbial biomarkers and develop effective microbiome-targeted therapies.

References

Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 62, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012

Njagi, P., Groot, W., Arsenijevic, J., Dyer, S., Mburu, G., & Kiarie, J. (2023). Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Open, 2023(2), hoad007. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad007

Andone, B. A., Handrea-Dragan, I. M., Botiz, I., & Boca, S. (2023). State-of-the-art and future perspectives in infertility diagnosis: Conventional versus nanotechnology-based assays. Nanomedicine, 54, Article 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2023.102709

Babakhanzadeh, E., Nazari, M., Ghasemifar, S., & Khodadadian, A. (2020). Some of the factors involved in male infertility: A prospective review. International Journal of General Medicine, 13, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S241099

Carson, S. A., & Kallen, A. N. (2021). Diagnosis and management of infertility. JAMA, 326(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4788

Ravel, J., et al. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(Suppl. 1), 4680–4687. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1002611107/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL

de Souza, S. V., et al. (2023). Vaginal microbioma and the presence of Lactobacillus spp. as interferences in female fertility: A review system. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 27(3), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230006

Xiao, L., Zuo, Z., & Zhao, F. (2024). Microbiome in female reproductive health: Implications for fertility and assisted reproductive technologies. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/GPBJNL/QZAD005

Günther, V., et al. (2022). Vaginal microbiome in reproductive medicine. Diagnostics, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS12081948

Zhao, C., et al. (2020). Characterization of the vaginal microbiome in women with infertility and its potential correlation with hormone stimulation during in vitro fertilization surgery. mSystems, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/MSYSTEMS.00450-20

Reschini, M., et al. (2022). Endometrial microbiome: Sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-12095-7

Moreno, I., et al. (2022). Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients. Microbiome, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-021-01184-W

Gao, X., Louwers, Y. V., Laven, J. S. E., & Schoenmakers, S. (2024). Clinical relevance of vaginal and endometrial microbiome investigation in women with repeated implantation failure and recurrent pregnancy loss. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS25010622

Medina-Bastidas, D., Camacho-Arroyo, I., & García-Gómez, E. (2022). Current findings in endometrial microbiome: Impact on uterine diseases. Reproduction, 163(5), R81–R96. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0120

Wang, J., et al. (2021). Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-021-24516-8

Balla, B., et al. (2024). The role of the vaginal and endometrial microbiomes in infertility and their impact on pregnancy outcomes in light of recent literature. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(23), 13227. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS252313227

Zeng, H., et al. (2022). Non-Lactobacillus dominance of the vagina is associated with reduced live birth rate following IVF/ICSI: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 305(2), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-021-06171-Y

Wang, T., et al. (2024). Vaginal microbiota are associated with in vitro fertilization during female infertility. iMeta, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/IMT2.185

Maksimovic Celicanin, M., Haahr, T., Humaidan, P., & Skafte-Holm, A. (2024). Vaginal dysbiosis - the association with reproductive outcomes in IVF patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000953

Kyono, K., Hashimoto, T., Kikuchi, S., Nagai, Y., & Sakuraba, Y. (2018). A pilot study and case reports on endometrial microbiota and pregnancy outcome: An analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing among IVF patients, and trial therapeutic intervention for dysbiotic endometrium. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 18(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/RMB2.12250

Foteinidou, P., Exindari, M., Chatzidimitriou, D., & Gioula, G. (2024). Endometrial microbiome and its correlation to female infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Microbiologica Hellenica, 69(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/AMH69010004

Bui, B. N., et al. (2023). The endometrial microbiota of women with or without a live birth within 12 months after a first failed IVF/ICSI cycle. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 3444. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-023-30591-2

Gao, H., et al. (2024). Deciphering the role of female reproductive tract microbiome in reproductive health: A review. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCIMB.2024.1351540

Salmasi, S., Sharifi, M., & Rashidi, B. (2021). Ovarian stimulation and exogenous progesterone affect the endometrial miR-16-5p, VEGF protein expression, and angiogenesis. Microvascular Research, 133, Article 104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2020.104074

Stoyancheva, G., Mihaylova, N., Gerginova, M., & Krumova, E. (2025). Endometrial microbiome and reproductive receptivity: Diverse perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110796

Li, Z. F., Yin, Z. F., Chen, W. Q., & Wang, Z. H. (2025). Impact of gut and reproductive tract microbiota on estrogen metabolism in endometriosis. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 93(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.70109

Swidsinski, S., Moll, W. M., & Swidsinski, A. (2023). Bacterial vaginosis-vaginal polymicrobial biofilms and dysbiosis. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 120(20), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0090

Badihi, E., et al. (2025). The effect of vitamin D supplementation and vaginal probiotics on fertility in women with recurrent implantation failure: A randomized clinical trial. Human Immunology, 86(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2025.111259

Thanaboonyawat, I., Pothisan, S., Petyim, S., & Laokirkkiat, P. (2023). Pregnancy outcomes after vaginal probiotic supplementation before frozen embryo transfer: A randomized controlled study. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-023-39078-6

Jepsen, I. E., et al. (2022). Probiotic treatment with specific lactobacilli does not improve an unfavorable vaginal microbiota prior to fertility treatment—A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 1057022. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENDO.2022.1057022

Luo, H., Zhou, C., Zhou, L., He, Y., & Xie, R. H. (2024). The effectiveness of vaginal microbiota transplantation for vaginal dysbiosis and bacterial vaginosis: A scoping review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 310(2), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-024-07611-1

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Agnieszka Krajewska, Adrianna Kowalik, Agnieszka Korzeniewska, Julia Dębczak, Karolina Łuczak, Katarzyna Tłustochowicz, Magdalena Korba, Natalia Malicka, & Wiktoria Polkowska. (2026). THE VAGINAL AND ENDOMETRIAL MICROBIOME IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 3(1(49). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5262