ACUTE VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS (PCI): MECHANISMS, PREVENTION, AND THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5318Keywords:
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Vascular Complications, Coronary Perforation, Stent Thrombosis, Bleeding Complications, Interventional CardiologyAbstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become one of the most commonly performed cardiovascular procedures worldwide and represents a cornerstone therapy for the treatment of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes. Over the past decades, significant technological and pharmacological advances have improved the safety and effectiveness of PCI procedures. Despite these developments, acute vascular complications remain an important clinical concern and may negatively affect procedural success and long-term outcomes.
Acute complications associated with PCI include coronary artery dissection, coronary perforation, acute vessel closure, stent thrombosis, and bleeding events related to vascular access or antithrombotic therapy. Although the overall incidence of such complications has declined with the introduction of modern drug-eluting stents, intravascular imaging, and radial artery access techniques, the increasing complexity of treated coronary lesions continues to present challenges for interventional cardiologists.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches for acute vascular complications following PCI. The analysis integrates findings from contemporary clinical trials, meta-analyses, international registries, and guideline documents. Particular attention is given to complications occurring during complex procedures such as chronic total occlusion interventions and treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions.
Understanding the mechanisms underlying PCI-related complications and implementing appropriate preventive strategies are essential for improving procedural safety and optimizing clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization.
References
Al-Ogaili, A., Gill, G. S., & Brilakis, E. S. (2025). Complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39788341/
Subramaniam, A., & Lombardi, W. L. (2026). Management of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention complications. Interventional Cardiology Clinics. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41276388/
Ramazani, N., et al. (2025). Use of calcium modification in percutaneous coronary intervention: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41303167/
Bianchini, E., et al. (2026). Clinical impact of angiographic complications occurring during percutaneous coronary interventions. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41668222/
Vadalà, G., et al. (2024). Contemporary outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe: The ERCTO registry. EuroIntervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38343371/
Moghadam, R. H., et al. (2024). The prevalence of bleeding after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Heart Journal. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10964472/
Piplani, S., et al. (2024). Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39710047/
Simsek, B., et al. (2023). Risk prediction scores in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. American Journal of Cardiology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36905687/
Simsek, B., et al. (2022). Clinical outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36227013/
Bangalore, S., et al. (2022). Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in complex coronary disease. Circulation. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014026
Levine, G. N., et al. (2021). ACC/AHA guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039
Neumann, F. J., et al. (2019). ESC guidelines for myocardial revascularization. European Heart Journal. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-0867-5426
Mehran, R., et al. (2013). Bleeding and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. The Lancet. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21700252/
Changal, K., et al. (2021). Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents outcomes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1553838920304449
Cutlip, D. E., et al. (2007). Clinical end points in coronary stent trials. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17470709/
Bangalore, S., et al. (2018). New-generation drug-eluting stents outcomes. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29945934/
Rao, S. V., et al. (2012). Transradial coronary angiography and intervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24123781/
Windecker, S., et al. (2014). Stent thrombosis definitions and outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.035
Valgimigli, M., et al. (2021). Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34449185/
Palmerini, T., et al. (2013). Risk factors for stent thrombosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.725
Généreux, P., et al. (2014). Calcified coronary lesions in percutaneous coronary intervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24561145/
Zografos, E. S., et al. (2020). Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention techniques. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11936-021-00914-5
Azzalini, L., et al. (2019). Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31217142/
Karmpaliotis, D., et al. (2015). Contemporary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention techniques. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26189193/
Bangalore, S., et al. (2015). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in multivessel disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1412168
Räber, L., et al. (2020). IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.031
Ali, Z. A., et al. (2017). Optical coherence tomography in percutaneous coronary intervention. The Lancet. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31018-8/fulltext
Stone, G. W., et al. (2018). Imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention trials. The Lancet. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02454-6/abstract
Kei-Yan, et al. (2021). Radial versus femoral access outcomes. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/JAHA.121.021256
Valgimigli, M., et al. (2017). Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28886622/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dominik Woźniak, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Mikołaj Dubiel , Sylwia Sanakiewicz, Patryk Obajtek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
