ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN REMOTE MONITORING OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DIGITAL BIOMARKERS, PATIENT ENGAGEMENT, AND BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5348Keywords:
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Artificial Intelligence, Remote Monitoring, Digital Biomarkers, Patient Engagement, TelemedicineAbstract
The growing availability of patient-generated health data is reshaping how rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be monitored beyond the clinic. This narrative review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) supports remote RA monitoring through digital biomarkers, patient-reported tools, and connected technologies, with particular attention to patient engagement and implementation barriers. A structured PubMed-based search identified literature on RA, AI, machine learning, remote monitoring, wearables, smartphone applications, telemedicine, and digital health. Across the reviewed studies, AI was used mainly to interpret longitudinal patient-reported outcomes, activity-tracker data, and daily smartphone symptom reports. Collectively, these approaches suggest that remote monitoring can enrich between-visit assessment, support flare detection, and provide a more continuous picture of disease experience than episodic clinic review alone. Yet the evidence base remains uneven, with many studies limited by small samples, short follow-up, exploratory modeling, and heterogeneous outcomes. The literature also makes clear that the practical success of remote monitoring depends on more than algorithmic performance; usability, adherence, digital literacy, trust, privacy, workflow integration, and equitable access all shape whether these tools can function in routine care. The most credible near-term model is therefore not fully automated monitoring, but hybrid, clinician-linked systems co-designed with users. AI-supported remote monitoring is a promising extension of RA care, but its long-term value will depend on whether it can be validated rigorously and implemented in ways that are patient-centered, clinically meaningful, and socially inclusive.
References
Austin, L., Sharp, C. A., van der Veer, S. N., Machin, M., Humphreys, J., Mellor, P., McCarthy, J., Ainsworth, J., Sanders, C., & Dixon, W. G. (2020). Providing “the bigger picture”: Benefits and feasibility of integrating remote monitoring from smartphones into the electronic health record. Rheumatology, 59(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez207
Benavent, D., Iniesta-Chamorro, J. M., Novella-Navarro, M., Pérez-Martínez, M., Martínez-Sánchez, N., Kaffati, M., Juárez-García, M., Molinari-Pérez, M., González-Torbay, A., Gutiérrez, M., López-Juanes, N., Navarro-Compán, V., Monjo-Henry, I., Rodríguez-Rosales, G., Bachiller, J., Calvo-Aranda, E., Michelena, X., Berbel-Arcobé, L., Balsa, A., ... Plasencia-Rodríguez, C. (2025). Digital health intervention for patient monitoring in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Cocreation and feasibility study of the IMIDoc platform. JMIR Human Factors, 12, e58095. https://doi.org/10.2196/58095
Curtis, J. R., Su, Y., Black, S., Xu, S., Langholff, W., Bingham, C. O., Kafka, S., & Xie, F. (2022). Machine learning applied to patient-reported outcomes to classify physician-derived measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. ACR Open Rheumatology, 4(12), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11499
Davergne, T., Rakotozafiarison, A., Servy, H., & Gossec, L. (2020). Wearable activity trackers in the management of rheumatic diseases: Where are we in 2020? Sensors, 20(17), 4797. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174797
Gandrup, J., Selby, D. A., van der Veer, S. N., McBeth, J., & Dixon, W. G. (2022). Using patient-reported data from a smartphone app to capture and characterize real-time patient-reported flares in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 6(1), rkac021. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkac021
Gandrup, J., Selby, D. A., & Dixon, W. G. (2024). Classifying self-reported rheumatoid arthritis flares using daily patient-generated data from a smartphone app: Exploratory analysis applying machine learning approaches. JMIR Formative Research, 8, e50679. https://doi.org/10.2196/50679
Gossec, L., Guyard, F., Leroy, D., Lafargue, T., Seiler, M., Jacquemin, C., Molto, A., Sellam, J., Foltz, V., Gandjbakhch, F., Hudry, C., Mitrovic, S., Fautrel, B., & Servy, H. (2019). Detection of flares by decrease in physical activity, collected using wearable activity trackers in rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis: An application of machine learning analyses in rheumatology. Arthritis Care & Research, 71(10), 1336–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23768
Hider, S., Muller, S., Gray, L., Manning, F., Brooks, M., Heining, D., Menon, A., Packham, J., Raghuvanshi, S., Roddy, E., Ryan, S., Scott, I., & Paskins, Z. (2023). Digital exclusion as a potential cause of inequalities in access to care: A survey in people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 7(1), rkac109. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkac109
Knitza, J., Simon, D., Lambrecht, A., Raab, C., Tascilar, K., Hagen, M., Kleyer, A., Bayat, S., Derungs, A., Amft, O., Schett, G., & Hueber, A. J. (2020). Mobile health usage, preferences, barriers, and eHealth literacy in rheumatology: Patient survey study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(8), e19661. https://doi.org/10.2196/19661
Momtazmanesh, S., Nowroozi, A., & Rezaei, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis: Current status and future perspectives: A state-of-the-art review. Rheumatology and Therapy, 9(5), 1249–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-022-00475-4
Rao, K., Speier, W., Meng, Y., Wang, J., Ramesh, N., Xie, F., Su, Y., Nowell, W. B., Curtis, J. R., & Arnold, C. (2023). Machine learning approaches to classify self-reported rheumatoid arthritis health scores using activity tracker data: Longitudinal observational study. JMIR Formative Research, 7, e43107. https://doi.org/10.2196/43107
Seppen, B. F., den Boer, P., Wiegel, J., Ter Wee, M. M., van der Leeden, M., de Vries, R., van der Esch, M., & Bos, W. H. (2020). Asynchronous mHealth interventions in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(11), e19260. https://doi.org/10.2196/19260
Sloan, M., Lever, E., Harwood, R., Gordon, C., Wincup, C., Blane, M., Brimicombe, J., Lanyon, P., Howard, P., Sutton, S., D’Cruz, D., & Naughton, F. (2022). Telemedicine in rheumatology: A mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians. Rheumatology, 61(6), 2262–2274. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
Watson, K., Sheldon, H., Pallari, E., Arumalla, N., Olive, R. R., Boiko, O., Aznar, C., Adams, E.-J., Bosworth, A., Demetriou, L., Martin, M., Palmer, M.-A., Sinclair, P., Smith, E. J., Sevdalis, N., Walker, A., & Garrood, T. (2024). Remote monitoring of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a low disease activity state: A mixed methods evaluation across six hospitals in London, UK. Rheumatology, 63(10), 2721–2733. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae112
White, K. M., Ivan, A., Williams, R., Galloway, J. B., Norton, S., & Matcham, F. (2021). Remote measurement in rheumatoid arthritis: Qualitative analysis of patient perspectives. JMIR Formative Research, 5(3), e22473. https://doi.org/10.2196/22473
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Martyna Szymczyk, Jagoda Pałubska, Oliwer Muller, Anna Szot, Dominik Szydełko, Katarzyna Rosa, Agata Słoma , Daria Danielczyk , Wiktor Czyżewski, Natalia Malatyńska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

