THE ROLE OF WEARABLE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MONITORING: A REVIEW OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5460

Keywords:

Wearable Digital Technologies, Reproductive Health, Fertility Tracking, Menstrual Cycle, Ovulation Prediction, Digital Health

Abstract

Wearable digital technologies are increasingly being used for reproductive health monitoring and may offer an alternative to traditional fertility awareness methods. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical utility, accuracy, and limitations of wearable devices for menstrual cycle tracking and fertile window detection.

A structured review of recent literature was conducted, focusing on studies assessing wearable digital technologies that measure physiological parameters such as body temperature, heart rate, and other related signals across the menstrual cycle. Particular attention was given to their ability to detect ovulation and predict the fertile window compared with established methods.

The findings indicate that wearable digital technologies can reliably capture cyclical physiological changes associated with menstrual phases. Continuous monitoring, particularly of temperature and cardiovascular parameters, appears to improve sensitivity compared with single-point measurements. Multimodal approaches that combine several physiological signals further enhance predictive performance. Wearable digital technologies generally outperform calendar-based methods and show comparable accuracy to some hormone-based approaches. However, most devices identify a narrower fertile window than the biologically defined period, which may limit their effectiveness for both conception planning and contraception.

Despite their promise, significant limitations remain, including variability in study design, lack of standardized validation methods, and reduced accuracy in individuals with irregular cycles. User adherence and external factors may also affect data quality and interpretation.

In conclusion, wearable digital technologies represent a promising tool for personalized reproductive health monitoring, but further high-quality studies and technological refinement are required before they can be fully integrated into clinical practice.

References

Ali, Z. E., Ammar, O. F., Liperis, G., Sharma, K., Hall, J., Grace, B., & Fraire-Zamora, J. J. (2025). Wearable intelligence: Can we transform fertility tracking through digital innovation? Human Reproduction, 40(9), 1803–1806. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf148

Cao, Y., Zhao, X., Dou, Z., Gong, Z., Wang, B., & Xia, T. (2024). The correlation between menstrual characteristics and fertility in women of reproductive age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 122(5), 918–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.06.016

de Jager, E., Caulfield, B., Angelidi, E., MacNamee, B., & Holden, S. (2026). Wearable-derived heart rate variability across the menstrual cycle, hormonal contraceptive use, and reproductive life stages in females: A living systematic review. Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02388-y

Goodale, B. M., Shilaih, M., Falco, L., Dammeier, F., Hamvas, G., & Leeners, B. (2019). Wearable sensors reveal menses-driven changes in physiology and enable prediction of the fertile window: Observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e13404. https://doi.org/10.2196/13404

Li, Y., Fang, Y., & Gu, S. (2025). Effectiveness of menstruation and fertility tracking technology in childbearing women: A scoping review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 59, e20240454. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0454en

Lyzwinski, L., Elgendi, M., & Menon, C. (2024). Innovative approaches to menstruation and fertility tracking using wearable reproductive health technology: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e45139. https://doi.org/10.2196/45139

Moghimikandelousi, S., Najm, L., Lee, Y., Bayat, F., Prasad, A., Khan, S., Bhavan, A., Gao, W., Hosseinidoust, Z., & Didar, T. F. (2025). Advances in biomonitoring technologies for women’s health. Nature Communications, 16(1), 8507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63501-3

Niggli, A., Rothenbühler, M., Sachs, M., & Leeners, B. (2023). Can wrist-worn medical devices correctly identify ovulation? Sensors, 23(24), 9730. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249730

Regidor, P.-A., Kaczmarczyk, M., Schiweck, E., Goeckenjan-Festag, M., & Alexander, H. (2018). Identification and prediction of the fertile window with a new web-based medical device using a vaginal biosensor for measuring the circadian and circamensual core body temperature. Gynecological Endocrinology, 34(3), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2017.1390737

Shi, Y., Wang, C. C., Yang, Y., Li, Q., Chung, P. W., & Wang, Y. (2026). The diagnostic accuracy of wearable digital technology in detecting fertility window and menstrual cycles: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. NPJ Digital Medicine, 9(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02320-8

Shilaih, M., de Clerck, V., Falco, L., Kübler, F., & Leeners, B. (2017). Pulse rate measurement during sleep using wearable sensors and its correlation with the menstrual cycle phases: A prospective observational study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01433-9

Shilaih, M., Goodale, B. M., Falco, L., Kübler, F., de Clerck, V., & Leeners, B. (2018). Modern fertility awareness methods: Wrist wearables capture the changes in temperature associated with the menstrual cycle. Bioscience Reports, 38(6), BSR20171279. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20171279

Thiyagarajan, D. K., Basit, H., & Jeanmonod, R. (2026). Physiology, menstrual cycle. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500020/

Wakefield, C., Yao, L., Self, S., & Frasch, M. G. (2023). Wearable technology for health monitoring during pregnancy: An observational cross-sectional survey study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 308(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06705-y

Wu, Y.-C., Su, E. C.-Y., Hou, J.-H., Lin, C.-J., Lin, K. B., & Chen, C.-H. (2025). Artificial intelligence and assisted reproductive technology: A comprehensive systematic review. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 64(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.10.001

Xiping, L., Xiaqiu, W., Lirong, B., Jin, P., & Hui, K.-K. (2022). Menstrual cycle characteristics as an indicator of fertility outcomes: Evidence from a prospective birth cohort study in China. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 42(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2022.02.010

Yu, J.-L., Su, Y.-F., Zhang, C., Jin, L., Lin, X.-H., Chen, L.-T., Huang, H.-F., & Wu, Y.-T. (2022). Tracking of menstrual cycles and prediction of the fertile window via measurements of basal body temperature and heart rate as well as machine-learning algorithms. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00993-4

Zaninovic, N., Elemento, O., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Its applications in reproductive medicine and the assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility, 112(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.019

Zhu, T. Y., Rothenbühler, M., Hamvas, G., Hofmann, A., Welter, J., Kahr, M., Kimmich, N., Shilaih, M., & Leeners, B. (2021). The accuracy of wrist skin temperature in detecting ovulation compared to basal body temperature: Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e20710. https://doi.org/10.2196/20710

Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., & Baird, D. D. (1995). Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation: Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(23), 1517–1521. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512073332301

Maijala, M., Kinnunen, H., Koskimäki, H., Jämsä, T., & Kangas, M. (2019). Nocturnal finger skin temperature in menstrual cycle tracking: Ambulatory pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e13478. https://doi.org/10.2196/13478

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Szalewska, L., Abdulgater, A., Kossman, M., Łysiak, J., Osuch-Tomaszewska, P., Urowska, W., Kazubek-Fuksiewicz, I., & Burtowicz, J. (2026). THE ROLE OF WEARABLE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MONITORING: A REVIEW OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 1(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5460

Most read articles by the same author(s)