WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY, CLINICAL INTEGRATION, AND THE MANAGEMENT OF SILENT ARRHYTHMIAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5512Keywords:
Atrial Fibrillation, Wearable Devices, Remote Patient Monitoring, Single-Lead ECG, Photoplethysmography, Socio-Technical BarriersAbstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and represents a major contributor to stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality. A significant proportion of AF cases remain asymptomatic, often referred to as "silent AF," which delays diagnosis and increases the risk of severe thromboembolic complications. Conventional diagnostic methods, including standard electrocardiography (ECG) and short-term Holter monitoring, are limited by their episodic nature and reliance on clinical settings, frequently failing to capture intermittent arrhythmic events. In recent years, consumer wearable technologies - particularly smartwatches equipped with photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors and single-lead ECG capabilities - have emerged as promising tools for continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring.
This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, clinical integration, and behavioral implications of wearable technologies for AF detection. Literature published between 2018 and 2025 was identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating sensing technologies, algorithmic approaches, large-scale population trials, and digital health behavior were included.
Current evidence demonstrates that wearable devices can achieve high concordance with traditional ECG-based diagnostic methods, with many studies reporting sensitivities and specificities exceeding 90%. Passive PPG monitoring combined with user-initiated ECG confirmation enables scalable detection of previously undiagnosed AF in real-world settings. However, challenges remain, including signal artifacts, false-positive alerts, user adherence, and socioeconomic disparities in device access.
Overall, wearable technologies represent a valuable adjunct for early AF detection and long-term rhythm monitoring. Their optimal clinical role lies within hybrid diagnostic pathways that integrate patient-generated data with physician validation and established cardiovascular care frameworks.
References
Abu-Alrub, S., Strik, M., Ramirez, F. D., Moussaoui, N., Racine, H. P., Marchand, H., Buliard, S., Haïssaguerre, M., Ploux, S., & Bordachar, P. (2022). Smartwatch electrocardiograms for automated and manual diagnosis of atrial fibrillation: A comparative analysis of three models. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, Article 836375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.836375
Albergoni, A., Hettinga, F. J., La Torre, A., et al. (2019). The role of technology in adherence to physical activity programs in patients with chronic diseases experiencing fatigue: A systematic review. Sports Medicine - Open, 5, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0214-z
Avanu, A. E., & Dodi, G. (2025). Wear your heart on your sleeve: Smart textile ECG wearables for comfort, integration, signal quality and continuous monitoring in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Sensors, 25(3), Article 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25030676
Bashar, S. K., Han, D., Soni, N. H., Chon, K. H., & McManus, D. D. (2019). Developing a relative power spectral density based algorithm for autonomous detection of atrial fibrillation using a smartphone. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 13054. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49092-2
Bell, L., Garnett, C., Bao, Y., Cheng, Z., Qian, T., Perski, O., Potts, H. W. W., & Williamson, E. (2023). How notifications affect engagement with a behavior change app: Results from a micro-randomized trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 11, e38342. https://doi.org/10.2196/38342
Blok, S., et al. (2025). Performance of a medical smartband with photoplethysmography technology and artificial intelligence algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation. mHealth, 11, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-10
Bonomi, A. G., Schipper, F., Eerikäinen, L. M., Margarito, J., van Dinther, R., Muesch, G., de Morree, H. M., Aarts, R. M., Babaeizadeh, S., McManus, D. D., & Dekker, L. R. C. (2018). Atrial fibrillation detection using a novel cardiac ambulatory monitor based on photo-plethysmography at the wrist. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(15), e009351. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009351
Chang, P. C., Wen, M. S., Chou, C. C., Wang, C. C., & Hung, K. C. (2022). Atrial fibrillation detection using ambulatory smartwatch photoplethysmography and validation with simultaneous Holter recording. American Heart Journal, 247, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.02.002
Choi, J. H., et al. (2025). Sequential AI-ECG diagnostic protocol for opportunistic atrial fibrillation screening. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(18), Article 6675. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186675
Ding, C., et al. (2024). Photoplethysmography based atrial fibrillation detection: A continually growing field. Physiological Measurement, 45(4), 04TR01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad37f0
Ding, E. Y., Tran, K. V., Lessard, D., Wang, Z., Han, D., Mohagheghian, F., Mensah Otabil, E., Noorishirazi, K., Mehawej, J., Filippaios, A., Naeem, S., Gottbrecht, M. F., Fitzgibbons, T. P., Saczynski, J. S., Barton, B., Chon, K., & McManus, D. D. (2023). Accuracy, usability, and adherence of smartwatches for atrial fibrillation detection in older adults after stroke: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Cardio, 7, e45137. https://doi.org/10.2196/45137
Eckardt, L., Sehner, S., Suling, A., Borof, K., Breithardt, G., Crijns, H., Goette, A., Wegscheider, K., Zapf, A., Camm, J., Metzner, A., & Kirchhof, P. (2022). Attaining sinus rhythm mediates improved outcome with early rhythm control therapy of atrial fibrillation: The EAST-AFNET 4 trial. European Heart Journal, 43(40), 4127–4144. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac471
Francisco, A., et al. (2025). Wearables and atrial fibrillation: Advances in detection, clinical impact, ethical concerns, and future perspectives. Cureus, 17(1), e77404. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77404
Fredriksson, T., Kemp Gudmundsdottir, K., Frykman, V., Friberg, L., Al-Khalili, F., Engdahl, J., & Svennberg, E. (2020). Intermittent vs continuous electrocardiogram event recording for detection of atrial fibrillation—Compliance and ease of use in an ambulatory elderly population. Clinical Cardiology, 43(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23323
Frodi, D. M., Kolk, M. Z. H., Langford, J., Knops, R., Tan, H. L., Andersen, T. O., Jacobsen, P. K., Risum, N., Svendsen, J. H., Tjong, F. V. Y., & Diederichsen, S. Z. (2024). Long-term adherence to a wearable for continuous behavioural activity measuring in the SafeHeart implantable cardioverter defibrillator population. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 5(5), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae055
Gaffey, A. E., Hooker, S. A., Lampert, R., Gehi, A. K., & Rosman, L. (2025). Psychological aspects of wearable health technologies in patients with cardiovascular disease: A literature review and call to action. Current Cardiology Reports, 27(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-025-02234-7
Goevaerts, M., Tenbült-Van Limpt, N., Kop, W., Kemps, H., & Lu, Y. (2025). Patient-reported experiences with long-term lifestyle self-monitoring in heart disease: Mixed methods study. JMIR Formative Research, 9, e76978. https://doi.org/10.2196/76978
Guo, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, H., et al. (2019). Mobile photoplethysmographic technology to detect atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 74(19), 2365–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.019
Guo, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Liu, T., Liang, Z., Xia, Y., Yan, L., Xing, Y., Shi, H., Li, S., Liu, E., Cao, K., Chen, Y., Lip, G. Y. H., & Lane, D. A. (2020). Population-based screening or targeted screening for atrial fibrillation: A report from the Huawei Heart Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5), Article 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051493
Hindricks, G., Potpara, T., Dagres, N., Arbelo, E., Bax, J. J., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Boriani, G., Castella, M., Dan, G. A., Dilaveris, P. E., Fauchier, L., Filippatos, G., Kalman, J. M., La Meir, M., Lane, D. A., Lebeau, J. P., Lettino, M., Lip, G. Y. H., Pinto, F. J., ... Watkins, C. (2021). 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal, 42(5), 373–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
Inocian, E. P., Junia, A. T., Cordovez, M. G. O., Katada, K. T., & Paday, L. M. W., IV. (2024). Accuracy of the Apple Watch in detecting atrial fibrillation among patients undergoing 24-hour Holter monitoring: A prospective, pragmatic study. Philippine Journal of Cardiology, 52(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.69944/pjc.4dfc7cfcda
Iqhrammullah, M., Abdullah, A., Hermansyah, Ichwansyah, F., Rani, H. A., Alina, M., Simanjuntak, A. M. T., Rampengan, D. D. C. H., Al-Gunaid, S. T., Gusti, N., Damarkusuma, A., & Wikurendra, E. A. (2025). Accuracy and interpretability of smartwatch electrocardiogram for early detection of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Arrhythmia, 41(3), e70087. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70087
Joglar, J. A., Chung, M. K., Armbruster, A. L., Benjamin, E. J., Chyou, J. Y., Cronin, E. M., Deswal, A., Eckhardt, L. L., Goldberger, Z. D., Gopinathannair, R., Gorenek, B., Hess, P. L., Hlatky, M. A., Hogan, G., Ibeh, C., Indik, J. H., Kirtane, A. J., Kusumoto, F. M., Link, M. S., ... Van Wagoner, D. R. (2023). 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.017
Kim, D., Yang, P.-S., & Joung, B. (2022). Optimal rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Korean Circulation Journal, 52(7), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2022.0078
Kim, H., Kim, E., Choi, C., & Yeo, W.-H. (2022). Advances in soft and dry electrodes for wearable health monitoring devices. Micromachines, 13(4), Article 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040629
Kirchhof, P., Camm, A. J., Goette, A., Brandes, A., Eckardt, L., Elvan, A., Fetsch, T., van Gelder, I. C., Haas, D., Kuck, K.-H., Metzner, A., Schotten, U., Senni, M., Zeppenfeld, K., Breithardt, G., Fabritz, L., Noack, H., & Brockmeyer, M. (2020). Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(14), 1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2019422
Kwon, S., Hong, J., Choi, E. K., et al. (2019). Deep learning approaches to detect atrial fibrillation using photoplethysmographic signals. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), e12770. https://doi.org/10.2196/12770
Lou, D. Y., Zhang, Z. W., Sibomana, O., & Izere, S. (2025). Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-based versus photoplethysmography-based smartwatches for atrial fibrillation detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 87(4), 2307–2323. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003155
Lubitz, S. A., Fossa, M., Trevidi, N., Stewart, M., Simmons, G., Yoo, C., Sidorov, E., Rong, Y., Lu, J., Rosenberg, Y., & Singer, D. E. (2022). Detection of atrial fibrillation in a large population using wearable devices: The Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation, 146(19), 1415–1424. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060291
Machino, T., Aonuma, K., Maruo, K., Komatsu, Y., Yamasaki, H., Igarashi, M., Nogami, A., & Ieda, M. (2023). Randomized crossover trial of 2-week garment electrocardiogram with dry textile electrode to reveal instances of post-ablation recurrence of atrial fibrillation underdiagnosed during 24-hour Holter monitoring. PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281818
Nault, I., et al. (2019). Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor—Cardiostat™—compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring. Journal of Electrocardiology, 53, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.12.007
Niu, Y., Wang, H., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Jin, Z., & Guo, Y. (2023). Diagnostic validation of smart wearable device embedded with single-lead electrocardiogram for arrhythmia detection. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231198682
Pamporis, K., Karakasis, P., Sagris, M., Theofilis, P., Milaras, N., Pantelidaki, A., Mourouzis, I., Fragakis, N., Vlachos, K., Kordalis, A., & Tsiachris, D. (2025). Prevalence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and risk factors associated with asymptomatic status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf138
Peimankar, A., & Puthusserypady, S. (2020). DENS-ECG: A deep learning approach for ECG signal delineation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.08689
Pereira, T., Tran, N., Gadhoumi, K., et al. (2020). Photoplethysmography based atrial fibrillation detection: A review. npj Digital Medicine, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0207-9
Perez, M. V., Mahaffey, K. W., Hedlin, H., Rumsfeld, J. S., Garcia, A., Ferris, T., Balasubramanian, V., Russo, A. M., Rajmane, A., Cheung, L., Hung, G., Lee, J., Kowey, P., Talati, N., Nag, D., Gummidipundi, S. E., ... Turakhia, M. P. (2019). Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(20), 1909–1917. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901183
Rosman, L., Lampert, R., Zhuo, S., Li, Q., Varma, N., Burg, M., Gaffey, A. E., Armbruster, T., & Gehi, A. (2024). Wearable devices, health care use, and psychological well-being in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American Heart Association, 13(15), e033750. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033750
Saarinen, H. J., et al. (2023). Wrist-worn device combining PPG and ECG can be reliably used for atrial fibrillation detection. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10, Article 1100127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1100127
Samol, A., Masin, M., Gellner, R., Otte, B., Pavenstädt, H.-J., Ringelstein, E. B., Reinecke, H., Waltenberger, J., & Kirchhof, P. (2012). Prevalence of unknown atrial fibrillation in patients with risk factors. Europace, 15(5), 657–662. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus366
Shahid, S., Iqbal, M., Saeed, H., Hira, S., Batool, A., Khalid, S., & Tahirkheli, N. K. (2025). Diagnostic accuracy of Apple Watch electrocardiogram for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC: Advances, 4(2), Article 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101538
Smith, S., & Maisrikrod, S. (2025). Wearable electrocardiogram technology: Help or hindrance to the modern doctor? JMIR Cardio, 9, e62719. https://doi.org/10.2196/62719
Tamura, T. (2019). Current progress of photoplethysmography and SpO2 for health monitoring. Biomedical Engineering Letters, 9, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-019-00097-w
Turakhia, M. P., et al. (2019). Rationale and design of a large-scale, app-based study to identify cardiac arrhythmias using a smartwatch: The Apple Heart Study. American Heart Journal, 207, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.09.002
Zarak, M. S., Khan, S. A., Majeed, H., Yasinzai, A. Q., Hamzazai, W., Chung, D., Koshkarian, G., & Fleming, K. S. (2024). Systematic review of validation studies for the use of wearable smartwatches in the screening of atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Arrhythmia, 25(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-024-00118-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Szymon Janczarski, Aleksandra Banaś, Dominika Sarna, Piotr Widera, Maciej Michalik, Klaudia Kwolek, Marcel Pilarek, Wiktoria Laskowska, Filip Basta, Hubert Dacyl

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

