IMAGING FOR PRRT SELECTION AND RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS: IS SSTR PET/CT SUFFICIENT?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5570

Keywords:

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Neuroendocrine Tumors, PRRT, SSTR PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, Response Assessment

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as an established treatment option for selected patients with advanced somatostatin receptor (SSTR) – positive neuroendocrine neoplasms, particularly well – differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP – NETs). In this setting, imaging is central not only to treatment selection, but also to biological risk stratification and post-treatment response evaluation. This structured narrative review examines the role of SSTR PET/CT, 18F – FDG PET/CT, and conventional cross – sectional imaging in PRRT candidate selection and response assessment. The literature search was performed in PubMed and focused on studies published from 2015 onward, with additional targeted identification of landmark clinical trials, consensus statements, and practice recommendations. Available evidence indicates that baseline SSTR PET/CT is essential for PRRT eligibility assessment, however, receptor positivity alone may be insufficient in biologically heterogeneous disease. In selected patients, particularly those with intermediate- or high-grade tumors, rapid progression, or discordance between clinical behavior and receptor imaging findings, 18F-FDG PET/CT provides complementary information on tumor aggressiveness and lesion-level heterogeneity. After PRRT, response assessment continues to rely predominantly on CT or MRI and RECIST 1.1, although this framework remains suboptimal in indolent, multifocal, bone-predominant, or mixed-response disease. Overall, current evidence supports a multimodal imaging strategy in which SSTR PET/CT remains the central theranostic tool, but is interpreted in conjunction with clinical context, cross-sectional imaging, and selective use of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

References

Aggarwal, P., Satapathy, S., Chandekar, K. R., & Sood, A. (2025). Response evaluation criteria in grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (RECIN). Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2025.11.009

Ambrosini, V., Caplin, M., Castaño, J. P., Christ, E., Denecke, T., Deroose, C. M., Dromain, C., Falconi, M., Grozinsky-Glasberg, S., Hicks, R. J., Hofland, J., Kjaer, A., Knigge, U. P., Kos-Kudla, B., Koumarianou, A., Krishna, B., Lamarca, A., Pavel, M., Reed, N. S., ... Prasad, V. (2024). Use and perceived utility of [18F]FDG PET/CT in neuroendocrine neoplasms: A consensus report from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Advisory Board Meeting 2022. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 36(1), e13359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13359

Ebner, R., Sheikh, G. T., Brendel, M., Ricke, J., & Cyran, C. C. (2024). ESR essentials: Role of PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors—Practice recommendations by the European Society for Hybrid, Molecular and Translational Imaging. European Radiology, 35(4), 1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11095-7

Hope, T. A., Bergsland, E. K., Bozkurt, M. F., Graham, M., Heaney, A. P., Herrmann, K., Howe, J. R., Kulke, M. H., Kunz, P. L., Mailman, J., May, L., Metz, D. C., Millo, C., O’Dorisio, S., Reidy-Lagunes, D. L., Soulen, M. C., & Strosberg, J. R. (2018). Appropriate use criteria for somatostatin receptor PET imaging in neuroendocrine tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.202275

Hope, T. A., Bodei, L., Chan, J. A., El-Haddad, G., Fidelman, N., Kunz, P. L., Mailman, J., Menda, Y., Metz, D. C., Mittra, E. S., Pryma, D. A., Reidy-Lagunes, D. L., Singh, S., & Strosberg, J. R. (2020). NANETS/SNMMI consensus statement on patient selection and appropriate use of 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.240911

Kong, G., Noe, G., Chiang, C., Herrmann, K., Hope, T. A., & Michael, M. (2024). Assessment of response to PRRT including anatomical and molecular imaging as well as novel biomarkers. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 37(3), e13461. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13461

Mamulashvili Bessac, D., Baltzinger, P., Poterszman, N., Pham Van, F., Collen, C., Malouf, G. G., Ouvrard, E., Kaseb, A., Porot, C., Ben Abdelghani, M., Addeo, P., Mertz, L., Goichot, B., & Imperiale, A. (2025). Organ-specific response to [177Lu]DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) assessed by sequential [68Ga]DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with metastatic small intestine neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine, 87(3), 1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04138-y

Metser, U., Nunez, J. E., Chan, D., Kulanthaivelu, R., Murad, V., Santiago, A. T., & Singh, S. (2024). Dual somatostatin receptor/18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with well-differentiated, grade 2 and 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 65(10), 1591–1596. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267982

Modica, R., Liccardi, A., Benevento, E., Minotta, R., Di Iasi, G., Di Nola, M., Coletta, M., & Colao, A. (2025). Tumor growth rate in neuroendocrine neoplasms: An additional tool for treatment strategies? Medicina, 61(10), 1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101852

Prasad, V., Koumarianou, A., Denecke, T., Sundin, A., Deroose, C. M., Pavel, M., Christ, E., Lamarca, A., Caplin, M., Castaño, J. P., Dromain, C., Falconi, M., Grozinsky-Glasberg, S., Hofland, J., Knigge, U. P., Kos-Kudla, B., Krishna, B. A., Reed, N. S., Scarpa, A., ... Ambrosini, V. (2025). Challenges in developing response evaluation criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: A consensus report from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Advisory Board Meeting 2022 and the ENETS Theranostics Task Force. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13479

Rindi, G., Mete, O., Uccella, S., Basturk, O., La Rosa, S., Brosens, L. A. A., Ezzat, S., de Herder, W. W., Klimstra, D. S., Papotti, M., & Asa, S. L. (2022). Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocrine Pathology, 33(1), 115–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09708-2

Singh, S., Halperin, D., Myrehaug, S., Herrmann, K., Pavel, M., Kunz, P. L., Chasen, B., Tafuto, S., Lastoria, S., Capdevila, J., García-Burillo, A., Oh, D. Y., Yoo, C., Halfdanarson, T. R., Falk, S., Folitar, I., Zhang, Y., Aimone, P., de Herder, W. W., & Ferone, D. (2024). [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus long-acting octreotide versus high dose long-acting octreotide for the treatment of newly diagnosed, advanced grade 2–3, well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-2): An open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. The Lancet, 403(10446), 2807–2817. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00701-3

Strosberg, J., El-Haddad, G., Wolin, E., Hendifar, A., Yao, J., Chasen, B., Mittra, E., Kunz, P. L., Kulke, M. H., Jacene, H., Bushnell, D., O’Dorisio, T. M., Baum, R. P., Kulkarni, H. R., Caplin, M., Lebtahi, R., Hobday, T., Delpassand, E., Van Cutsem, E., ... Krenning, E. (2017). Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1607427

Sultana, Q., Kar, J., Verma, A., Sanghvi, S., Kaka, N., Patel, N., Sethi, Y., Chopra, H., Kamal, M. A., & Greig, N. H. (2023). A comprehensive review on neuroendocrine neoplasms: Presentation, pathophysiology and management. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155138

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Kujach, A., & Góralska, J. (2026). IMAGING FOR PRRT SELECTION AND RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS: IS SSTR PET/CT SUFFICIENT?. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5570