THE MODEL OF THE 21st CENTURY UNIVERSITY TEACHER: INTERNATIONAL TRENDS AND PRACTICES

Oyuntsetseg Densmaa; Ankhbayar Davaanyam; Ariunzul Enkhbat

doi:10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5571

Authors

Oyuntsetseg Densmaa Chief of Department, National Defense University, Mongolia
Ankhbayar Davaanyam Lecturer, National Defense University, Mongolia
Ariunzul Enkhbat Lecturer, National Defense University, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5571

Keywords:

21st Century Competencies, University Teachers, TPACK Model, Digital Competencies, Professional Development, Pedagogy, Teacher Models, International Experience

Abstract

The rapid transformation of higher education in the 21st century, driven by technological advancements, globalization, artificial intelligence, and changing labor market needs, has reshaped the role and expectations of university educators. Traditional views of teachers as mere knowledge transmitters are no longer adequate for preparing students for the complexities of today’s world. Modern university instructors must adapt to a digital, interdisciplinary, and student-focused learning environment, necessitating a reevaluation of their professional identity and skills.

This article presents a comprehensive model of the contemporary university teacher, encompassing six interconnected roles: learning facilitator, researcher-innovator, digital creator, promoter of inclusive education, ethical leader, and collaborative leader. Drawing on established theoretical frameworks such as the TPACK model, the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators, and the Darling-Hammond model of effective professional development, this model offers a solid foundation for understanding the multifaceted nature of academic teaching today.

By examining higher education teacher reform efforts in various countries, including Finland, Singapore, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States, common principles and unique strategies are identified to inform the development of effective teaching models. While approaches differ among countries, such as Finland’s autonomy-based system and the US’s competency-focused education with AI integration, a shared commitment to ongoing professional development, digital literacy, and the recognition of teaching as a scholarly pursuit is evident.

The study underscores the importance of a diverse skill set for 21st century university teachers, encompassing content knowledge, pedagogical expertise, technological proficiency, research skills, ethical values, and social responsibility.

The article concludes with tailored recommendations for enhancing higher education in Mongolia, emphasizing the necessity of systemic reforms in professional development, digital infrastructure, research culture, and international partnerships to align with global standards.

References

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). The George Washington University.

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Deloitte Center for Higher Education Excellence. (2025, December 24). 2025 higher education trends. Deloitte Insights. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/2025-us-higher-education-trends.html

Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. (2025, July 4). Australian Universities Accord reforms. Australian Government. https://www.dewr.gov.au/skills-reform/australian-universities-accord-reforms

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Dochia, I. (2025). The changing role of teachers in the digital age: From knowledge transmitter to learning facilitator. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation, 12(23), 109–118.

European Commission. (2022). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union.

Google. (2026). Higher Ed Faculty AI Fellowship 2026. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/education/higher-ed-faculty-ai-fellowship/

Higher Ed Dive. (2018, October 24). Report: 5 models to guide the future of higher education. https://www.highereddive.com/news/report-5-models-to-guide-the-future-of-higher-education/540429/

Karacaoglu, O. C. (2022). Basic skills of 21st century teachers. Faculty of Education.

Kary, S. (2022). The 7 core 21st century teacher competencies. New EdTech Classroom.

Lai, I. K. W., & Bower, M. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6

Liu, D. Y. T., & Bates, S. (2025, January). Generative AI in higher education: Current practices and ways forward [White paper]. Association of Pacific Rim Universities. https://www.apru.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APRU-Generative-AI-in-Higher-Education-Whitepaper_Jan-2025.pdf

Markauskaite, L., & Reimann, P. (2023). The role of teachers in a sustainable university: From digital competencies to postdigital capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10199-z

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Nanyang Technological University. (2021). NTU 2025 strategic plan: Education. https://www.ntu.edu.sg/about-us/ntu-2025/education

National Center on Education and the Economy. (2025, December 17). Finland. https://ncee.org/finland/

National Institute of Education, NTU. (2025). Learning & teaching @NIE: Teaching and learning framework. https://www.ntu.edu.sg/nie/

OECD. (2022). Expanding and steering capacity in Finnish higher education (OECD Education Policy Perspectives No. 50).

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. P21.

QuadC. (2025, March 6). The biggest higher education trends of 2025 you need to know. https://www.quadc.io/blog/top-trends-in-higher-education

Salgado, M. A., Buele, J., et al. (2025). Transformations in academic work and faculty perceptions of artificial intelligence in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1603763. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1603763

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Times Higher Education. (2025, November). UK research faces a radical overhaul. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/uk-research-faces-radical-overhaul

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st-century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Vaatainen, H., & Aksela, M. (2022). Curriculum and teacher education reforms in Finland that support the development of competences for the twenty-first century. In Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century. Springer.

Wagner, M., Helm, C., & Poecze, F. (2024). Exploring teacher educators’ challenges in the context of digital transformation and their self-reported TPACK. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2340689

World Economic Forum. (2018, September). 10 reasons why Finland’s education system is the best in the world. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/09/10-reasons-why-finlands-education-system-is-the-best-in-the-world/