ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ALGORITHMIC ACCURACY, RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES, AND THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5675

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence; Emergency Triage; Algorithmic Bias; Health Equity; Social Determinants of Health

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding represents a growing global public health challenge. Limitations of conventional five-level triage scales — including interrater variability and documented racial and socioeconomic disparities — have driven increasing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) for triage optimization. Existing literature has largely examined algorithmic accuracy, fairness, and social determinants of health (SDOH) in isolation.

Objective: This narrative review synthesizes evidence across three interconnected domains: algorithmic accuracy of AI triage models compared with conventional scales; racial and socioeconomic disparities and the mechanisms producing algorithmic bias; and the integration of SDOH into AI-driven triage.

Methods: Peer-reviewed publications were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (January 2015 through March 2026), combining structured keyword-based searches across emergency care, AI methodology, equity, and SDOH.

Results: AI models — particularly gradient-boosted ensembles and NLP-augmented architectures — consistently outperform ESI, MTS, and CTAS in predicting critical endpoints, with AUROC gains of 0.05–0.10. However, biased proxy variables, measurement artifacts (e.g., pulse oximetry), unrepresentative training data, and biased outcome labels can amplify existing disparities. SDOH integration offers potential for improving equity but faces challenges including Z-code underutilization, definitional heterogeneity, and stigmatization risk. Emerging frameworks — the EU AI Act, FDA guidance, WHO principles, and TRIPOD+AI — provide a scaffold for responsible deployment.

Conclusions: Realizing AI's benefits while avoiding harm requires rigorous external validation, transparent subgroup reporting, explicit fairness evaluation, post-deployment monitoring, and participatory design.

References

Abbott, E. E., Apakama, D., Richardson, L. D., Chan, L., & Nadkarni, G. N. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence and data science for integration of social determinants of health in emergency medicine: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e57124. https://doi.org/10.2196/57124

Aboy, M., Minssen, T., & Vayena, E. (2024). Navigating the EU AI Act: Implications for regulated digital medical products. npj Digital Medicine, 7, 237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01232-3

Almulihi, Q. A., Alquraini, A. A., Almulihi, F. A. A., Alzahid, A. A., Al Qahtani, S. S. A. J., Almulhim, M., Alqhtani, S. H. S., Alnafea, F. M. N., Mushni, S. A. S., Alaqil, N. A., Assiri, M. I. F., & Maghraby, N. H. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine triage: A systematic review. Medical Archives, 78(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2024.78.198-206

Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

Bullard, M. J., Musgrave, E., Warren, D., Unger, B., Skeldon, T., Grierson, R., van der Linde, E., & Swain, J. (2017). Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) guidelines 2016. CJEM, 19(S2), S18–S27. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2017.365

Cairns, C., Ashman, J. J., & King, J. M. (2023). Emergency department visit rates by selected characteristics: United States, 2021 (NCHS Data Brief No. 478). National Center for Health Statistics.

Chang, C. Y., Abujaber, S., Reynolds, T. A., Camargo, C. A., Jr., & Obermeyer, Z. (2016). Burden of emergency conditions and emergency care usage: New estimates from 40 countries. Emergency Medicine Journal, 33(11), 794–800. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-205709

Chang, H., Yu, J. Y., Yoon, S., Kim, T., & Cha, W. C. (2022). Machine learning-based suggestion for critical interventions in the management of potentially severe conditioned patients in emergency department triage. Scientific Reports, 12, 10537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14422-4

Chen, P., Wu, L., & Wang, L. (2023). AI fairness in data management and analytics: A review on challenges, methodologies and applications. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10258. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810258

Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J. B., van Smeden, M., Boulesteix, A.-L., Camaradou, J. C., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Glocker, B., Golub, R. M., Harvey, H., Heinze, G., … Logullo, P. (2024). TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385, e078378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378

El Arab, R. A., & Al Moosa, O. A. (2025). The role of AI in emergency department triage: An integrative systematic review. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 89, 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104058

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., & Beam, A. L. (2021). The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(11), e745–e750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9

Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018). Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(11), 1544–1547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763

Gräff, I., Goldschmidt, B., Glien, P., Bogdanow, M., Fimmers, R., Hoeft, A., Kim, S.-C., & Grigutsch, D. (2014). The German version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria—First assessment of validity and reliability. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e88995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995

Grant, L., Diagne, M., Aroutiunian, R., Hopkins, D., Bai, T., Kondrup, F., & Clark, G. (2025). Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

Hall, J. N., McCarron, J., Toarta, C., McLeod, S. L., on behalf of the CTAS National Advisory Committee and the NENA Triage Committee. (2025). Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) guidelines 2025. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27, 774–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00996-1

Hinson, J. S., Levin, S. R., Steinhart, B. D., Chmura, C., Sangal, R. B., Venkatesh, A. K., & Taylor, R. A. (2025). Enhancing emergency department triage equity with artificial intelligence: Outcomes from a multisite implementation. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 85(3), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.10.014

Hinson, J. S., Martinez, D. A., Schmitz, P. S. K., Toerper, M., Radu, D., Scheulen, J., Stewart de Ramirez, S. A., & Levin, S. (2018). Accuracy of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: A retrospective cohort analysis. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0161-8

Hong, W. S., Haimovich, A. D., & Taylor, R. A. (2018). Predicting hospital admission at emergency department triage using machine learning. PLOS ONE, 13(7), e0201016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201016

Hood, C. M., Gennuso, K. P., Swain, G. R., & Catlin, B. B. (2016). County health rankings: Relationships between determinant factors and health outcomes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024

Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017). Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. In C. H. Papadimitriou (Ed.), 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017) (Vol. 67, pp. 43:1–43:23). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.43

Mirhaghi, A., Heydari, A., Mazlom, R., & Ebrahimi, M. (2015). The reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Meta-analysis. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(7), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.161243

Mirhaghi, A., Mazlom, R., Heydari, A., & Ebrahimi, M. (2017). The reliability of the Manchester Triage System (MTS): A meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12231

Moen, M., Storr, C., German, D., Friedmann, E., & Johantgen, M. (2020). A review of tools to screen for social determinants of health in the United States: A practice brief. Population Health Management, 23(6), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2019.0158

Morley, C., Unwin, M., Peterson, G. M., Stankovich, J., & Kinsman, L. (2018). Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0203316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203316

Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342

Pearce, S., Marchand, T., Shannon, T., Ganshorn, H., & Lang, E. (2023). Emergency department crowding: An overview of reviews describing measures, causes, and harms. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 18(4), 1137–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03239-2

Porto, B. M. (2024). Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: A systematic review. BMC Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01135-2

Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G., & Chin, M. H. (2018). Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(12), 866–872. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1990

Rasouli, H. R., Aliakbar Esfahani, A., Nobakht, M., Eskandari, M., Mahmoodi, S., Goodarzi, H., & Abbasi Farajzadeh, M. (2019). Outcomes of crowding in emergency departments: A systematic review. Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(1), e52.

Salih, A. M., Raisi-Estabragh, Z., Galazzo, I. B., Radeva, P., Petersen, S. E., Lekadir, K., & Menegaz, G. (2025). A perspective on explainable artificial intelligence methods: SHAP and LIME. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 7(1), 2400304. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202400304

Sax, D. R., Warton, E. M., Mark, D. G., Vinson, D. R., Kene, M. V., Ballard, D. W., Vitale, T. J., McGaughey, K. R., Beardsley, A., Pines, J. M., & Reed, M. E. (2023). Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index in US emergency departments for the rate of mistriage. JAMA Network Open, 6(3), e233404. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3404

Sitthiprawiat, P., Wittayachamnankul, B., Sirikul, W., & Laohavisudhi, K. (2025). Development and internal validation of an AI-based emergency triage model for predicting critical outcomes in emergency department. Scientific Reports, 15, 31212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1

Sjoding, M. W., Dickson, R. P., Iwashyna, T. J., Gay, S. E., & Valley, T. S. (2020). Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(25), 2477–2478. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2029240

Sukhera, J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1

Taylor, R. A., Chmura, C., Hinson, J., Steinhart, B., Sangal, R., Venkatesh, A. K., Xu, H., Cohen, I., Faustino, I. V., & Levin, S. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence–based triage decision support on emergency department care. NEJM AI, 2(3), AIoa2400296. https://doi.org/10.1056/AIoa2400296

Truong, H. P., Luke, A. A., Hammond, G., Wadhera, R. K., Reidhead, M., & Joynt Maddox, K. E. (2020). Utilization of social determinants of health ICD-10 Z-codes among hospitalized patients in the United States, 2016–2017. Medical Care, 58(12), 1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001418

Tyler, S., Olis, M., Aust, N., Patel, L., Simon, L., Triantafyllidis, C., Patel, V., Lee, D. W., Ginsberg, B., Ahmad, H., & Jacobs, R. J. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in triage in hospital emergency departments: A scoping review. Cureus, 16(5), e59906. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59906

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence-enabled device software functions: Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/marketing-submission-recommendations-predetermined-change-control-plan-artificial-intelligence

Vyas, D. A., Eisenstein, L. G., & Jones, D. S. (2020). Hidden in plain sight—Reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(9), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2004740

World Health Organization. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health (Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2). WHO.

World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. WHO.

World Health Organization. (2024). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models. WHO.

Yun, H., Choi, J., & Park, J. H. (2021). Prediction of critical care outcome for adult patients presenting to emergency department using initial triage information: An XGBoost algorithm analysis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(9), e30770. https://doi.org/10.2196/30770

Zachariasse, J. M., van der Hagen, V., Seiger, N., Mackway-Jones, K., van Veen, M., & Moll, H. A. (2019). Performance of triage systems in emergency care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 9(5), e026471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471

Zhang, F., Zhai, D., Bai, G., Jiang, J., Ye, Q., Ji, X., & Liu, X. (2025). Towards fairness-aware and privacy-preserving enhanced collaborative learning for healthcare. Nature Communications, 16, 2852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58055-3

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Danilczuk, D., Buszko, J., Dyś, M., Baran, N., Bajkowska-Piterak, M., Piterak, P., Szlachta-Gubernat, M., Adamiec, W., & Buż, A. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ALGORITHMIC ACCURACY, RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES, AND THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 3(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5675