SMARTPHONE-BASED AND INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY FOR HOME PREVENTION OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS: ACCESSIBILITY, ADOPTION, AND HEALTH-EQUITY PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6043Keywords:
Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Infrared Thermography, Home Monitoring, Mobile Health, Health Equity, Ulcer PreventionAbstract
Home infrared temperature monitoring for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention is supported by multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating reductions of roughly 60 to 90% in ulcer recurrence among high-risk patients (IWGDF risk categories 2 to 3) when compared with standard care without thermometry. These findings hold across diverse geographic and resource settings, including low-resource contexts in Indonesia and Peru. Technology platforms range from handheld infrared thermometers costing 30 to 100 US dollars to smartphone-attached thermal cameras, wireless thermometric mats, sensor-embedded socks rated 9 to 10 out of 10 for comfort, and wearable Internet-of-Things devices costing as little as 14.80 US dollars per unit. Adherence rates across technologies generally range from 70% to 88% over study periods of 6 to 24 months, and predictive systems can detect impending ulcers up to 37 days in advance with 97% sensitivity, though at the cost of a 57% false-positive rate at standard thresholds. Despite promising accessibility features, significant barriers remain, including physical limitations such as arthritis and vision loss, incorrect device use in nearly half of participants despite training, and reliance on assistance from others for interpreting results among older, low-income users, all of which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Critically, no study formally evaluated differential effectiveness by socioeconomic status, race or ethnicity, education level, or insurance coverage, leaving a substantial gap in the health-equity evidence base. The addition of mHealth reminders to thermometry did not improve adherence or outcomes beyond thermometry alone. While the technological and cost barriers to home thermometry are increasingly surmountable, the absence of equity-stratified analyses means that whether these tools reduce or inadvertently widen disparities in DFU outcomes cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
References
Abbott, C. A., Franklyn, K., Stuart, D. E., et al. (2024). Use of a remote thermovisual monitoring system in high-risk patients: A pilot study (525-P). Diabetes, 73(Suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-525-p
Armstrong, D., Holtz-Neiderer, K., Wendel, C., et al. (2007). Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients. American Journal of Medicine, 120(12), 1042–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.028
Bougrine, A. (2020). Analyse d’images thermiques de la voûte plantaire: Application au diagnostic du pied diabétique [Plantar foot thermal image analysis: Application to diabetic foot diagnosis]. https://doi.org/10.70675/2ddb7ddfz94efz4d4bz8d74z7d135dffe211
Crawford, F., Chappell, F., Lewsey, J., et al. (2020). Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: Development and validation of a prognostic model. Health Technology Assessment, 24(62), 1–198. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24620
Frykberg, R., Gordon, I., Reyzelman, A., et al. (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of a smart mat technology to predict development of diabetic plantar ulcers. Diabetes Care, 40(7), 973–980. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2294
Gordon, I., Nouvong, A., Najafi, B., et al. (2018). Accuracy of daily foot temperature monitoring for patients with recently healed diabetic foot ulcers or history of amputation. Diabetes, 67(Suppl. 1), 114-OR. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-114-or
Hazenberg, C., aan de Stegge, W. B., van Baal, S. G., et al. (2019). Telehealth and telemedicine applications for the diabetic foot: A systematic review. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 35(7), e3247. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3247
Hunt, D. (2005). Foot temperature monitoring at home reduced foot complications in high-risk patients with diabetes. Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.10.3.86
Kashyap, S., Sharma, B. R., & Devi, M. (2025). AI-enhanced multimodal sensing for early detection of diabetic foot ulcers: A cost-effective wearable solution. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 13. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.70456
Lavery, L., Higgins, K. R., Lanctot, D., et al. (2004). Home monitoring of foot skin temperatures to prevent ulceration. Diabetes Care, 27(11), 2642–2647. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.11.2642
Lavery, L., Higgins, K. R., Lanctot, D., et al. (2007). Preventing diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients. Diabetes Care, 30(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1600
Lazo-Porras, M., Bernabé-Ortiz, A., Taype-Rondan, Á., et al. (2020). Foot thermometry with mHealth-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 23. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15531.1
Ming, A., Alhajjar, A., Walter, I., et al. (2023). Telemedical monitoring of plantar temperature in diabetic patients at risk of foot ulcers: The randomized Smart Prevent Diabetic Feet trial. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 120. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0229
Özkal, F., & Yüksel, S. (2025). The effect of thermal assessment in preventing diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial protocol. KTO Karatay University Journal of Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.59244/ktokusbd.1644504
Qin, Q., Oe, M., Nakagami, G., et al. (2022). The effectiveness of preventive foot care with thermography-driven risk assessment on the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4286200
Qin, Q., Oe, M., Nakagami, G., et al. (2023). The effectiveness of a thermography-driven preventive foot-care protocol on the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers in low-medical-resource settings: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 145, 104571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104571
Reyzelman, A., Koelewyn, K., Murphy, M., et al. (2018). Continuous temperature-monitoring socks for home use in patients with diabetes: Observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(12), e12460. https://doi.org/10.2196/12460
Sandi, S., Yusuf, S., Kaelan, C., & Mukhtar, M. (2020). Evaluation of risk of diabetic foot ulcers using infrared thermography based on mobile phone as an advanced risk-assessment tool in the community setting: A multisite cross-sectional study. Enfermería Clínica, 30(Suppl. 2), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.136
Silva, A. F. R. da, Carvalho Neto, F. J. de, Guimarães, M. R., et al. (2020). Mobile technology in foot care for people with diabetes mellitus: An integrative review. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde, 19, e50361. https://doi.org/10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v19i0.50361
Stevens, K., Moralejo, D., Ersser, S., & MacLean, C. (2022). Effectiveness of a foot self-management intervention that utilized commercially available infrared thermometers: Mixed-methods research incorporating a pilot RCT. Journal of Tissue Viability, 32(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.005
Stevens, K., Moralejo, D., Ersser, S., & MacLean, C. (2023). Benefits and challenges of using a commercially available infrared thermometer for foot self-management for patients with diabetes: Findings of a mixed-methods study. Wound Care Canada. https://doi.org/10.56885/wxvg8173
Stevens, L. (2020). Effectiveness of a foot self-management intervention that utilized commercially available infrared thermometers: A patient-oriented research and mixed-methods research study.
Taslim, M., Mubarak, Z., & Nafisah, S. (2022). Effectiveness of telemedicine health for patients with diabetic foot ulcers care. Nursing Update, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.36089/nu.v13i4.903
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jerzy Buszko, Michał Dyś, Adrianna Buż, Damian Danilczuk, Marta Bajkowska-Piterak, Monika Szlachta-Gubernat, Nicol Baran, Przemysław Piterak, Wiktor Adamiec

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

