SELECTED LASER TECHNOLOGIES USED IN OPHTHALMOLOGY: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF CORNEAL REFRACTIVE PROCEDURES, Nd:YAG LASER APPLICATIONS, AND THEIR CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6055Keywords:
Laser Ophthalmology, Refractive Surgery, LASIK, PRK, Nd:YAG Laser, Laser IridotomyAbstract
Laser technologies constitute a fundamental component of contemporary ophthalmology, permitting precise and minimally invasive treatment of refractive errors and selected ocular conditions. The aim of this review is to discuss the most important applications of laser refractive procedures and the Nd:YAG laser. The section on refractive surgery examines photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), with particular emphasis on their mechanisms of action, indications, advantages, limitations, and potential complications. PRK remains a significant method of superficial ablation, especially for patients with thinner corneas or an elevated risk of complications related to flap creation. LASIK provides rapid visual improvement but necessitates a thorough assessment of corneal biomechanics and ocular surface status. SMILE offers a flapless alternative, particularly for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. The review also addresses the clinical applications of the Nd:YAG laser, including posterior capsulotomy, peripheral iridotomy, and vitreolysis. The analysis indicates that the effectiveness of laser treatment in ophthalmology is determined not only by technological sophistication but also by appropriate patient selection, outcome assessment, and the surgeon’s expertise.
References
Gianfaldoni, S., Tchernev, G., Wollina, U., Fioranelli, M., Roccia, M. G., Gianfaldoni, R., & Lotti, T. (2017). An overview of laser in dermatology: The past, the present and … the future (?). Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 5(4), 526–530. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.130
Townes, C. T. (2003). The first laser. In L. Garwin & T. Lincoln (Eds.), A century of Nature: Twenty-one discoveries that changed science and the world (pp. 107–112). University of Chicago Press.
Tanasiewicz, M., Kaszuba, M., & Ilewicz, L. (2003). Zarys historii laserów i ich zastosowanie w stomatologii. Magazyn Stomatologiczny, 5, 76–81.
Fiedor, P., Kęcik, T., Niechoda, Z., Nowakowski, W., Nowicki, M., Otto, W., Pirożyński, M., & Stanowski, E. (Eds.). (1995). Zarys klinicznych zastosowań laserów. Dom Wydawniczy.
Krauss, J. M., & Puliafito, C. A. (1995). Lasers in ophthalmology. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 17(2), 102–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900170203
Chang, J. Y., Lin, P. Y., Hsu, C. C., & Liu, C. J. (2022). Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 85(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000674
Gurnani, B., & Patel, B. C. (2025). Photorefractive keratectomy. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549887/
Nair, S., Kaur, M., Sharma, N., & Titiyal, J. S. (2023). Refractive surgery and dry eye: An update. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(4), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3406_22
Moshirfar, M., Somani, S. N., & Patel, B. C. (2024). Small incision lenticule extraction. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549896/
Way, C., Elghobaier, M. G., & Nanavaty, M. A. (2024). Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: Review. Vision, 8(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8010016
Sabhapandit, S., Abdussamad, A., Shaik, T. A., & Perumalla, S. R. (2023). Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia correction: An uncharted territory. Clinical Ophthalmology, 17, 1497–1504. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S415636
Alasbali, T. (2022). Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy compared to conventional photorefractive keratectomy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, Article 3022672. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3022672
Moshirfar, M., Bennett, P., & Ronquillo, Y. (2023). Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555970/
Tamimi, A., Sheikhzadeh, F., Ezabadi, S. G., et al. (2023). Post-LASIK dry eye disease: A comprehensive review of management and current treatment options. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, Article 1057685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1057685
Almutairi, M. N., Alshehri, A. M., Alhoumaily, A. Y., et al. (2025). Meta-analysis: Clinical outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in hyperopia. BMC Ophthalmology, 25, Article 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03956-6
Sharma, V. K., Sati, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive surgery: Our initial experience. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 78(Suppl. 1), S105–S110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.07.012
Bamahfouz, A. Y. (2024). Femtosecond-laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction to treat refractive error: A narrative review. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 30(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_149_23
Cui, G., Di, Y., Yang, S., Chen, D., & Li, Y. (2023). Efficacy of small-incision lenticule extraction surgery in high astigmatism: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article 1100241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1100241
Dhanisha, J. L., Anandan, H., & Vinitha, B. (2025). Neodymium doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser physics in ophthalmology. Greenfort International Journal of Applied Medical Science, 3(4), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.62046/gijams.2025.v03i04.004
Savastru, D., Miclos, S., Cotirlan, C., Savastru, R., & Stefanescu, A. (2006). Microsurgical Nd:YAG laser used in ophthalmology. Romanian Journal of Physics, 51(7–8), 833–838. https://rjp.nipne.ro/2006_51_7-8/0833_0838.pdf
Averbukh, E., Slushetz, Y., Levy, J., Patal, R., Mandelbaum, Y., & Arieli, Y. (2024). Advanced optical analysis of divergence between the foci of the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) and aiming beam lasers. Ophthalmology Science, 4(5), Article 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2024.100512
Karahan, E., Er, D., & Kaynak, S. (2014). An overview of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation in Ophthalmology, 3(2), 45–50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4346677/
Brézin, A. P., Labbé, A., Schweitzer, C., Lignereux, F., Rozot, P., Goguillot, M., Bugnard, F., & Dot, C. (2023). Incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy following cataract surgery: A population-based nation-wide study—FreYAG1 study. BMC Ophthalmology, 23, Article 417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03134-6
Lighthizer, N., Johnson, S., Holthaus, J., et al. (2023). Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy: Efficacy and outcomes performed by optometrists. Optometry and Vision Science, 100(10), 665–669. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002057
Elbaz, U., Hakkala, L., Hecht, I., Achiron, A., & Tuuminen, R. (2021). Nd:YAG capsulotomy is not a risk factor for retinal detachment after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmologica, 99(7), e1018–e1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14757
Borkenstein, A. F., & Borkenstein, E. M. (2024). Precise posterior Nd:YAG capsulotomy without creating defects is key for patients’ quality of vision. Clinical Ophthalmology, 18, 361–364. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S451238
Kavitha, S., Zebardast, N., Swetha, S., Khurana, M., Tripathi, S., Tejaswini, S. U., Zhang, Y., & Venkatesh, R. (2026). Laser peripheral iridotomy induced changes in eyes with primary angle closure disease. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 74(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1474_25
Gray, R. H., Nairne, J. H., & Ayliffe, W. H. (1989). Efficacy of Nd:YAG laser iridotomies in acute angle closure glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 73(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.73.3.182
Mishima, K., Mataki, N., Murata, H., Ohtani, S., Sakai, H., Tomidokoro, A., Aihara, M., Miyata, K., Iwase, A., & Araie, M. (2025). Five-year effect of sequential argon-Nd:YAG prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy on corneal endothelial cell density in Japanese eyes with narrow angles. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(5), 789–797.
Zhang, Z. Y., Liang, Z. Q., & Bao, Y. Z. (2025). Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy for reverse pupillary block: A case report. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 18(8), 1606–1609. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.08.25
Liu, J., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Li, J., Pan, C., Jiang, K., & Cheng, J. (2025). Efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser vitreolysis in patients with physiological vitreous floaters. BMC Ophthalmology, 25, Article 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04311-5
Nunes, G. M., Ludwig, G. D., Gemelli, H., Zanotele, M., & Serracarbassa, P. D. (2022). Long-term evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser vitreolysis for symptomatic vitreous floaters. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 87(2), Article 0395. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0395
Janeková, A., Veith, M., Fillová, D., & Janek, M. (2022). Laser vitreolysis in patients with symptomatic vitreous floaters. Česká a Slovenská Oftalmologie, 78(6), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.31348/2022/28
Goh, W. N., Mustapha, M., Zakaria, S. Z. S., & Bastion, M. C. (2022). The effectiveness of laser vitreolysis for vitreous floaters in posterior vitreous detachment. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 70(8), 3026–3032. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3198_21
Shah, C. P., & Heier, J. S. (2017). YAG laser vitreolysis vs sham YAG vitreolysis for symptomatic Weiss ring floaters: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmology, 135(9), 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.2388
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Anna Czarnecka, Krzysztof Sebastian Habirek, Maja Maria Porażko, Anna Katarzyna Żurakowska-Zadrożna, Adrianna Krupska, Zuzanna Marta Marcinkowska, Joanna Zuzanna Gugulska, Anna Kropiwnicka, Michał Kieres, Klaudia Karolina Wójcik, Aleksander Kacper Kierys, Michał Mieczysław Parus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
