SOCIAL VULNERABILITY, RURALITY, AND EMERGENCY COLON CANCER CARE: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.6092Keywords:
Colon Cancer, Social Vulnerability, Rural Health, Emergency Surgery, Treatment Inequities, Public HealthAbstract
Objective: To integrate recent evidence on the ways neighborhood social vulnerability and rural residence influence emergency presentation in colon cancer and the care trajectory that follows surgery.
Methodology: This narrative review examined PubMed-indexed literature identified through a targeted search on March 5, 2026. Systematic reviews, multicenter observational studies, and intervention studies published in English between 2013 and 2026 were prioritized, with preference for colon-specific evidence and selective inclusion of colorectal studies when directly applicable to colon cancer pathways.
Results: The literature points to a consistent pathway: socially vulnerable and rural populations are screened less often, enter care later, undergo non-elective surgery more frequently, and face greater difficulty completing postoperative and adjuvant care. Studies also suggest that provider availability, Commission on Cancer accreditation, patient navigation, and telehealth-supported follow-up can mitigate part of this disadvantage, although digital strategies remain constrained by broadband access, language barriers, and digital literacy.
Conclusion: Emergency colon cancer surgery is best interpreted as a downstream marker of inequity across the care continuum. Efforts to reduce it should connect public-health outreach, access planning, perioperative care, and technology-enabled continuity rather than treating the emergency operation as an isolated event.
References
Bauer, C., Zhang, K., Xiao, Q., Lu, J., Hong, Y.-R., & Suk, R. (2022). County-level social vulnerability and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in the US, 2018. JAMA Network Open, 5(9), e2233429. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429
Bondzi-Simpson, A., Ribeiro, T., Zhu, A., Lofters, A., Covelli, A., Snyder, R. A., Clarke, C. N., Coburn, N. G., & Hallet, J. (2025). Integration of social determinants of health in quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery: A scoping review. EClinicalMedicine, 89, 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103565
Brand, N. R., Greenberg, A. L., Chiou, S. H., Adam, M., & Sarin, A. (2022). Association of distance, region, and insurance with advanced colon cancer at initial diagnosis. JAMA Network Open, 5(9), e2229954. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29954
Carethers, J. M., & Doubeni, C. A. (2020). Causes of socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer and intervention framework and strategies. Gastroenterology, 158(2), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029
Chan, K., Palis, B. E., Cotler, J. H., Janczewski, L. M., Weigel, R. J., Bentrem, D. J., & Ko, C. Y. (2025a). Association of Commission on Cancer accreditation with receipt of guideline-concordant care and survival among patients with colon cancer. World Journal of Surgery, 49(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12391
Chan, K., Palis, B. E., Cotler, J. H., Janczewski, L. M., Weigel, R. J., Ko, C. Y., & Bentrem, D. J. (2025b). Social vulnerability and receipt of guideline-concordant care among patients with colorectal cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 240(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001193
Diaz, A., Barmash, E., Azap, R., Paredes, A. Z., Hyer, J. M., & Pawlik, T. M. (2021). Association of county-level social vulnerability with elective versus non-elective colorectal surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 25(3), 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04768-3
Franklin, I. R., Gambatese, R., Duggan, M. C., Green, B. B., Nocon, R. S., Coronado, G. D., Hahn, E. E., Honda, S. A., Koplan, K., Levin, T. R., Steiner, C. A., & Ngo-Metzger, Q. (2025). Colorectal cancer screening and social needs. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 37(5), 868–887. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230497R1
Golder, A. M., McMillan, D. C., Horgan, P. G., & Roxburgh, C. S. D. (2022). Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08447-y
Guillaume, E., Dejardin, O., Bouvier, V., De Mil, R., Berchi, C., Pornet, C., Christophe, V., Notari, A., Delattre Massy, H., De Seze, C., Peng, J., Guittet, L., & Launoy, G. (2017). Patient navigation to reduce social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 103, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.012
Honeycutt, S., Green, R., Ballard, D., Hermstad, A., Brueder, A., Haardörfer, R., Yam, J., & Arriola, K. J. (2013). Evaluation of a patient navigation program to promote colorectal cancer screening in rural Georgia, USA. Cancer, 119(16), 3059–3066. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28033
Isenberg, E. E., Kunnath, N., Suwanabol, P. A., Ibrahim, A., Tipirneni, R., & Harbaugh, C. M. (2024). Social vulnerability and perioperative outcomes after colectomy for colon cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 28(11), 1783–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.014
Khan, M. M. M., Munir, M. M., Khalil, M., Tsilimigras, D. I., Woldesenbet, S., Endo, Y., Katayama, E., Rashid, Z., Cunningham, L., Kaladay, M., & Pawlik, T. M. (2024). Association of county-level provider density and social vulnerability with colorectal cancer-related mortality. Surgery, 176(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.035
Korn, A. R., Walsh-Bailey, C., Correa-Mendez, M., DelNero, P., Pilar, M., Sandler, B., Brownson, R. C., Emmons, K. M., & Oh, A. Y. (2023). Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73(5), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21801
Lin, C. C., Bruinooge, S. S., Kirkwood, M. K., Olsen, C., Jemal, A., Bajorin, D., Giordano, S. H., Goldstein, M., Guadagnolo, B. A., Kosty, M., Hopkins, S., Yu, J. B., Arnone, A., Hanley, A., Stevens, S., & Hershman, D. L. (2015). Association between geographic access to cancer care, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy: Geographic distribution of oncologists and travel distance. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(28), 3177–3185. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1558
Marks, V. A., Hsiang, W. R., Umer, W., Haleem, A., Kim, D., Kunstman, J. W., Leapman, M. S., & Schuster, K. M. (2022). Access to telehealth services for colorectal cancer patients in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Surgery, 224(5), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.06.005
Masoud, S. J., Seo, J. E., Singh, E., Woody, R. L., Muhammed, M., Webster, W., & Mantyh, C. R. (2024). Social Vulnerability Index and survivorship after colorectal cancer resection. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 238(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000961
Morris, B. B., Rossi, B., & Fuemmeler, B. (2022). The role of digital health technology in rural cancer care delivery: A systematic review. Journal of Rural Health, 38(3), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12619
Sepassi, A., Li, M., Zell, J. A., Chan, A., Saunders, I. M., & Mukamel, D. B. (2024). Rural-urban disparities in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Oncologist, 29(4), e431–e446. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad347
Tadé, Y., Timperley, J., Dilsaver, D., McDermott, J., de Rosa, N., & Al-Refaie, W. B. (2024). High-risk rural surgical patients and poor access to elective colorectal cancer surgery: Insight for multilevel intervention for rural America. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 28(11), 1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michał Babicz, Oliwer Muller, Katarzyna Rosa, Agata Słoma, Jagoda Pałubska, Natalia Malatyńska, Anna Szot, Dominik Szydełko, Daria Danielczyk, Paweł Żurek

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

