NARRATIVE REVIEW: LAPAROSCOPIC VS OPEN REPAIR OF INGUINAL HERNIAS IN ATHLETES: CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND RETURN TO SPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6216Keywords:
Inguinal Hernia; Athletes; Sports Performance; Return to Play; Laparoscopic Repair; Open Repair; Postoperative Recovery; Quality of CareAbstract
Background: Inguinal hernias are super common, especially in active folks like athletes and gym-goers. They can really mess things up – causing pain, tanking your performance, and sidelining you from sports for weeks. If rest, physical therapy, or other conservative fixes don't cut it, surgery's usually the best bet to get you back in the game.
There are two main surgical routes: open surgery (the classic approach) and laparoscopic surgery (the minimally invasive one). Both work well, but which one's right for you depends on factors like your hernia size, your activity level, and what your surgeon recommends.
Goal: This narrative review compares laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia treatment in athletes, emphasizing clinical results, complications, and timetables for return to sport.
Methods: A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies were identified using combinations of relevant keywords, including “inguinal hernia”, “laparoscopic repair”, “open repair”, and “athletes”. Clinical studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines published primarily within the last 10 years were included. A qualitative synthesis was performed.
Results: Available evidence suggests that laparoscopic repair may be associated with reduced postoperative pain and earlier functional recovery compared with open repair. Long-term outcomes, including recurrence rates, appear comparable between techniques. However, evidence specifically addressing athletic populations remains limited and heterogeneous.
Conclusions: Both surgical techniques are effective and safe. Laparoscopic repair may offer advantages in early recovery and return to sport. Surgical decision-making should be individualized.
References
Simons, M. P., Aufenacker, T., Bay-Nielsen, M., Bouillot, J. L., Campanelli, G., Conze, J., et al. (2018). International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia, 22(1), 1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
Bittner, R., & Schwarz, J. (2012). Inguinal hernia repair: Current surgical techniques. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 397(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0875-7
Köckerling, F., & Simons, M. P. (2018). Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visceral Medicine, 34(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487278
Aiolfi, A., Cavalli, M., Micheletto, G., Lombardo, F., Bonitta, G., Morlacchi, A., Bruni, P. G., Campanelli, G., & Bona, D. (2019). Primary inguinal hernia: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair. Hernia, 23(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2
Grant, A. M., & EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. (2002). Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: Meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia, 6(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0050-8
Haladu, N., Alabi, A., Brazzelli, M., Imamura, M., Ahmed, I., Ramsay, G., et al. (2022). Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: An overview of systematic reviews. Surgical Endoscopy, 36, 4685–4700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6
Sanderson, R., De-Marchi, D. D., Cesário, J. C. B., Dias Sanderson, L. G., & Zilberstein, B. (2024). Quality of life using EuraHS-QoL scores after surgical treatment of inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein techniques. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva, 37, e1798. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020240005e1798
Köckerling, F., & Lammers, B. (2018). Open inguinal hernia repair. Surgical Clinics of North America, 98(3), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.02.003
Huerta, S., & Garza, A. M. (2025). A systematic review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030990
Almarhabi, Y. (2025). Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: Retrospective cohort study. Journal of Current Medical Science, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v11i5.1949
Piozzi, G. N., Cirelli, R., Salati, I., Maino, M. E., Leopaldi, E., Lenna, G., et al. (2019). Laparoscopic approach to inguinal disruption in athletes. Sports Medicine - Open, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0201-4
Paajanen, H., Brinck, T., Hermunen, H., & Airo, I. (2011). Laparoscopic surgery for chronic groin pain in athletes is more effective than nonoperative treatment: A randomized clinical trial with magnetic resonance imaging of 60 patients with sportsman’s hernia (athletic pubalgia). Surgery, 150(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.02.016
Meyers, W. C., McKechnie, A., Philippon, M. J., Horner, M. A., Zoga, A. C., & Devon, O. N. (2017). Experience with sports hernia. Annals of Surgery, 266(4), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002366
Thorborg, K., & Sheen, A. J. (2026). Inguinal-related groin pain and/or disruption in athletes: Current understanding, assessment and management strategies. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 16, 510774. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S510774
Serner, A., van Eijck, C. H., Beumer, B. R., Hölmich, P., Weir, A., & de Vos, R. J. (2015). Study quality on groin injury management remains low: A systematic review on treatment of groin pain in athletes. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(12), 813. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094256
Falvey, E. C., King, E., Kinsella, S., & Franklyn-Miller, A. (2016). Athletic groin pain (part 1): A prospective anatomical diagnosis of 382 patients—Clinical findings, MRI findings and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(7), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094912
Campanelli, G. (2017). Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Hernia, 21(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1593-z
Goksoy, B., Yilmaz, G., Azamat, I. F., Ozata, I. H., & Duman, K. (2021). Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair—TAPP versus TEP: Results of 301 consecutive patients. Surgical Technology International, 39, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1427
Miserez, M., Peeters, E., Aufenacker, T., et al. (2018). Update of laparoscopic hernia guidelines. Hernia, 22(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1662-3
Sharma, P., Boyers, D., Scott, N. W., et al. (2018). Laparoscopic vs open repair: Outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment, 22(28), 1–165. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22280
Jenkins, J. T., & O’Dwyer, P. J. (2018). Inguinal hernias. BMJ, 336, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD
Pulikkal Reghunandanan, R., Ali Usman, A., Basheer, S., Kuttichi, L., Els Jojo, J., & Abdul Rasheed, M. F. (2023). Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study. Cureus, 15(11), e48619. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48619
Fitzgibbons, R. J., & Forse, R. A. (2015). Clinical practice: Groin hernias in adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(8), 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1404068
The HerniaSurge Group. (2018). International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia, 22(1), 1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Natalia Krupa, Aleksandra Marzec, Dominika Galińska, Natalia Domańska , Anna Roman, Joanna Zajączkowska, Natalia Marzec, Małgorzata Cherek, Weronika Praska, Stanisław Wardęcki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
