ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD-BASED PREDICTIVE APPROACHES FOR HOSPITAL READMISSION: A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF SOCIOECONOMIC VARIABLES AND ALGORITHMIC EQUITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(52).2026.6377Keywords:
Predictive Modeling, Electronic Health Records, Hospital Readmission, Social Determinants of Health, Algorithmic Fairness, Health EquityAbstract
Background: Hospital readmission rates are often used to judge the quality of care and how well healthcare systems are working. Predictive models based on electronic health records (EHRs) can help estimate which patients are at higher risk, but when they don’t properly reflect socioeconomic realities, they can unintentionally reinforce existing inequalities (Obermeyer et al., 2019). This review looks at how well these EHR-based models predict 30-day readmissions, how Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) are included, and what this means for fairness and health equity in real-world use.
Methodology: A structured literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. It included peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2026, focusing on model validation studies, retrospective cohort analyses, and research on bias and fairness in predictive healthcare models.
Results: Synthesis reveals that incorporating unstructured and structured SDOH variables yields mixed impacts on discriminatory performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve changes ranging from -0.01 to +0.04), yet significantly rectifies systemic algorithmic underestimation of risk for marginalized demographics. Unadjusted models consistently show racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic bias, often because they rely on proxy variables embedded in historical healthcare data (Gianfrancesco et al., 2018). As a result, preventive transition-of-care resources can be systematically directed away from the patients who need them most (Pierson et al., 2021).
Conclusion: To make predictive healthcare tools truly useful in practice, it is not enough to focus only on accuracy. They also need to account for fairness, real clinical context, and the actual consequences of their use in everyday healthcare settings (Wiens et al., 2019). Policy-level interventions must mandate standardized SDOH extraction alongside equity-focused calibration algorithms before widespread clinical deployment (Ghassemi et al., 2021).
References
Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D., & Madai, V. I. (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6
Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018). Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA, 319(13), 1317–1318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18391
Challen, R., Denny, J., Pitt, M., Gompels, L., Edwards, T., & Tsaneva-Atanasova, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229
Chen, I. Y., Szolovits, P., & Ghassemi, M. (2019). Can AI help reduce disparities in general medical and mental health care? AMA Journal of Ethics, 21(2), E167–E179. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.167
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., … Mahmood, F. (2023). Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 7(6), 719–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8
Eneanya, N. D., Yang, W., & Reese, P. P. (2019). Reconsidering the consequences of using race to estimate kidney function. JAMA, 322(2), 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.7742
Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., … Dean, J. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z
Futoma, J., Simons, M., Panch, T., Doshi-Velez, F., & Celi, L. A. (2020). The myth of generalisability in clinical AI. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(9), e489–e492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30185-9
Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., & Ranganath, R. (2020). A review of challenges and opportunities in machine learning for health. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 2020, 191–200. PMID: 32426066
Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., & Beam, A. L. (2021). The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(11), e745–e750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018). Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(11), 1544–1547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763
Gottlieb, L. M., Fichtenberg, C., Alderwick, H., & Adler, N. E. (2019). Social determinants of health: What's a healthcare system to do? Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00057
Johnson, A. E., Bulgarelli, L., Shen, L., Gayles, A., Shammout, A., Horng, S., … Mark, R. G. (2023). MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Scientific Data, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01899-x
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2
McCradden, M. D., Joshi, S., Anderson, J. A., Mazwi, M. L., & Goldenberg, A. (2020). Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(5), e221–e223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30065-0
Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018). Deep learning for healthcare: Review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx044
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
Pfohl, S. R., Foryciarz, A., & Shah, N. H. (2021). An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 113, 103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103621
Pierson, E., Cutler, D. M., Leskovec, J., Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2021). An algorithmic approach to reducing unexplained pain disparities in underserved populations. Nature Medicine, 27(1), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01192-7
Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G., & Meyer, M. H. (2018). Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(12), 866–872. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1990
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., … Dean, J. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. npj Digital Medicine, 1(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1
Rose, S. (2020). Machine learning for prediction in electronic health data. JAMA Network Open, 3(8), e2014017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14017
Sendak, M., D'Arcy, J., Kashyap, S., Gao, M., Sethi, N., Balu, S., & Nichols, M. (2020). A path for translation of machine learning products into healthcare delivery. EMJ Innovations, 10(1), 19–28.
Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Liu, G., McDermott, M., Chen, I. Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifiers. Nature Medicine, 27(12), 2212–2216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01545-7
Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
Ustun, B., Spangher, A., & Liu, Y. (2019). Actionable recourse in linear classification. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287566
Vayena, E., Blasimme, A., & Cohen, I. G. (2018). Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLOS Medicine, 15(11), e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689
Vyas, D. A., Eisenstein, L. G., & Jones, D. S. (2020). Hidden in plain sight—Reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. The New England Journal of Medicine, 383(9), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2004740
Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., … Barton, C. (2019). Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maciej Kamil Majchrzak, Faustyna Magdalena Kołodziej, Krzysztof Konopka, Mateusz Lis, Zuzanna Julia Komin, Maryan Liasota, Eliza Zofia Kabat, Jakub Juskowiak, Alicja Kwiatkowska, Michalina Justyna Kozłowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
