CURRENT CONCEPTS IN ROOT CANAL IRRIGATION: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, EDTA, ULTRASONIC, SONIC, AND NEGATIVE PRESSURE IRRIGATION PROTOCOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6485Keywords:
Endodontics, Root Canal Irrigation, Sodium Hypochlorite, EDTA, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Sonic Activation, Negative Pressure IrrigationAbstract
Successful endodontic treatment depends on effective cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system, as mechanical instrumentation alone cannot adequately eliminate microorganisms, organic tissue remnants, and the smear layer from the complex anatomy of root canals. Irrigation protocols have therefore become an essential component of modern endodontic therapy, combining chemical irrigants with various activation techniques to improve antimicrobial efficacy and debris removal. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) remains the gold standard irrigant because of its unique ability to dissolve organic tissues and eliminate a broad spectrum of microorganisms, while ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is routinely used to remove the inorganic component of the smear layer and facilitate dentinal tubule penetration. Recent technological developments have introduced irrigation activation systems, including passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic activation devices, and apical negative pressure irrigation, which have demonstrated improved irrigant distribution and enhanced cleaning efficiency compared with conventional syringe irrigation.
This narrative review aims to summarize current evidence regarding the effectiveness of contemporary root canal irrigation protocols and to compare their antimicrobial activity, smear layer removal, debris elimination, irrigant penetration, and clinical safety. A comprehensive literature search was performed using major biomedical databases, with emphasis on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and influential review articles published between 2006 and 2025.
Current evidence indicates that irrigation activation significantly improves canal cleanliness and irrigant penetration compared with conventional needle irrigation. Passive ultrasonic irrigation consistently demonstrates superior performance in smear layer and debris removal, whereas sonic activation offers effective disinfection with greater simplicity and lower equipment requirements. Negative pressure irrigation systems reduce the risk of apical irrigant extrusion while maintaining adequate irrigation of the apical third. Although no single protocol is universally superior in every clinical scenario, combining sodium hypochlorite and EDTA with an appropriate activation technique appears to provide the most predictable clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on protocol standardization and high-quality clinical trials to establish evidence-based recommendations for routine endodontic practice.
References
Tonini, R., Salvadori, M., Audino, E., Garo, M. L., Salgarello, S., et al. (2022). Irrigating solutions and activation methods used in clinical endodontics: A systematic review. Front Oral Health, 3, 838043. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2022.838043
Rossi-Fedele, G., Rödig, T., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of root canal irrigation and dressing for the treatment of apical periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. International Endodontic Journal.
Ali, N. T., El-Boghdadi, R. M., Ibrahim, A. M., & Amin, S. A. W. (2022). Clinical and microbiological effects of ultrasonically activated irrigation versus syringe irrigation during endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Odontology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00671-8
Chu, X., Feng, S., Zhou, W., Xu, S., & Zeng, X. (2023). Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically activated irrigation in root canals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 23, 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02875-6
Kumar, R. S., Ankola, A. V., Peerzade, M., et al. (2023). Comparative efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques for irrigant delivery up to the working length of mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Endodontic Journal.
Kumar, R. S., Ankola, A. V., Sankeshwari, R. M., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of various irrigant activation techniques on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into lateral canals of mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Dental Journal.
Mazreah, S. A., Shirvani, A., Dianat, O., et al. (2023). Evaluation of irrigant extrusion following the use of different root canal irrigation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian Endodontic Journal.
Boutsioukis, C., & Arias-Moliz, M. T. (2022). Present status and future Directions—Irrigants and irrigation methods. International Endodontic Journal.
Căpută, P. E., Retsas, A., Kuijk, L., Chávez de Paz, L. E., & Boutsioukis, C. (2019). Ultrasonic irrigant activation during root canal treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Endodontics.
Barbosa, A. F. A., Lima, C. O., Sassone, L. M., et al. (2021). Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on hard tissue debris removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Oral Research. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0123
Haapasalo, M., Shen, Y., Wang, Z., & Gao, Y. (2014). Irrigation in endodontics. British Dental Journal, 216(6), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204
Zehnder, M. (2006). Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics, 32(5), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
van der Sluis, L. W. M., Versluis, M., Wu, M. K., & Wesselink, P. R. (2007). Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal, 40(6), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
Gu, L. S., Kim, J. R., Ling, J., Choi, K. K., Pashley, D. H., & Tay, F. R. (2009). Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. Journal of Endodontics, 35(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010
Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) in Endodontics. European Journal of Dentistry. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S135-S142. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119091
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ewa Jurkowska, Zofia Wiśniewska, Stanisław Jurkowski

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

