EVALUATING THE SAFETY OF HOME BIRTH IN THE MODERN HEALTHCARE CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4363

Keywords:

Home Birth, Hospital Birth, Maternal Outcomes, Neonatal Outcomes, Low-Risk Pregnancy, Childbirth Safety

Abstract

The choice between home birth and hospital birth remains a topic of considerable discussion within contemporary obstetrics. The choice of birth setting and the characteristics of women opting for home birth vary across different regions of the world. In developed countries, hospitals are the default place of birth, whereas in developing countries, childbirth more often occurs at home. One of the most important criteria for comparing home and hospital births is the safety of both the mother and the newborn.

The comparison of home and hospital births among low-risk women shows similar neonatal safety, with lower NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) admissions and intervention rates in home births. Mothers delivering at home experience fewer cesarean sections, episiotomies, and postpartum complications. However, outcomes vary regionally, with U.S. studies reporting higher neonatal risks in planned home births.

Transfer to hospital rates range from 10-30%, mainly due to slow labour. VBACs (Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) at home are associated with lower cesarean rates but higher non-urgent transfers. Postpartum outcomes, including breastfeeding success, are superior after home birth. Evidence suggests that, in integrated systems, home birth can be a safe and informed choice.

References

Akokuwebe, M. E., & Idemudia, E. S. (2023). Factors associated with choice of home birth as place of delivery among women of reproductive age in South Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 27(1), 22-40.

Bayrampour, H., Lisonkova, S., Tamana, S., Wines, J., Vedam, S., & Janssen, P. (2021). Perinatal outcomes of planned home birth after cesarean and planned hospital vaginal birth after cesarean at term gestation in British Columbia, Canada: a retrospective population‐based cohort study. Birth, 48(3), 301-308.

Beckmann, L., Barger, M., Dorin, L., Metzing, S., & Hellmers, C. (2014). Vaginal birth after cesarean in German out‐of‐hospital settings: maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with their second child. Birth, 41(4), 309-315.

Blix, E., Kumle, M., Kjærgaard, H., Øian, P., & Lindgren, H. E. (2014). Transfer to hospital in planned home births: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 179.

Blix, E., Kumle, M. H., Ingversen, K., Huitfeldt, A. S., Hegaard, H. K., Ólafsdóttir, Ó. Á., … & Lindgren, H. (2016). Transfers to hospital in planned home birth in four Nordic countries–a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95(4), 420-428.

Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. (2011). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ, 343.

Buchanan, C., Kuo, S., Minton, L., Lee, M. J., Choi, S. Y., & Soon, R. (2022). Neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and planned home birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 67(1), 69-74.

Chauncy, C., Dawson, K., & Bayes, S. (2025). What do safety and risk mean to women who choose to birth at home? A systematic review. Midwifery, 144, 104340.

Cheyney, M., Bovbjerg, M., Everson, C., Gordon, W., Hannibal, D., & Vedam, S. (2014). Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 59(1), 17-27.

Combellick, J. L., Shin, H., Shin, D., Cai, Y., Hagan, H., Lacher, C., … & Dominguez-Bello, M. G. (2018). Differences in the fecal microbiota of neonates born at home or in the hospital. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 15660.

Damentko, A., Damra, O., Dąbrowska, K., Kiersnowska, I., & Bączek, G. (2023). Planned place of birth and its relationship to emotions and fear in Polish women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Science Pulse, 17(3).

Davies-Tuck, M. L., Wallace, E. M., Davey, M. A., Veitch, V., & Oats, J. (2018). Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 357.

Daviss, B. A., Anderson, D. A., & Johnson, K. C. (2021). Pivoting to childbirth at home or in freestanding birth centers in the US during COVID-19: safety, economics and logistics. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 618210.

Fleming, S. E., Donovan-Batson, C., Burduli, E., Barbosa-Leiker, C., Martin, C. J. H., & Martin, C. R. (2016). Birth Satisfaction Scale/Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS/BSS-R): A large scale United States planned home birth and birth centre survey. Midwifery, 41, 9-15.

Galera-Barbero, T. M., & Aguilera-Manrique, G. (2021). Planned home birth in low-risk pregnancies in Spain: a descriptive study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3784.

Galková, G., Böhm, P., Hon, Z., Heřman, T., Doubrava, R., & Navrátil, L. (2022). Comparison of frequency of home births in the member states of the EU between 2015 and 2019. Global Pediatric Health, 9, 2333794X211070916.

Green, G., Tesler, R., & Marques, A. (2022). Primiparous and multiparous women’s mode of birth and negative emotions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5189.

Gregory, S., Caffrey, L., & Daly, D. (2023). “It could not have been more different.” Comparing experiences of hospital-based birth and homebirth in Ireland: A mixed-methods survey. Women and Birth, 36(4), e445–e452.

Grünebaum, A., McCullough, L. B., Orosz, B., & Chervenak, F. A. (2020). Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223(2), 254.e1.

Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2023). Tabl.21. Urodzenia według miejsca odbytego porodu i województw rejestracji. Retrieved from https://demografia.stat.gov.pl/bazademografia/Tables.aspx

Higueras, M. V., Douglas, F., & Kennedy, C. (2024). Exploring women's motivations to freebirth and their experience of maternity care: A systematic qualitative evidence synthesis. Midwifery, 134, 104022.

Hutton, E. K., Reitsma, A., Simioni, J., Brunton, G., & Kaufman, K. (2019). Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine, 14, 59-70.

Lang, G., Farnell IV, E. A., & Quinlan, J. D. (2021). Out-of-hospital birth. American Family Physician, 103(11), 672-679.

Lisowska, K., & Dobrzycka, B. (2025). Poród domowy w Polsce na podstawie danych Stowarzyszenia Niezależna Inicjatywa Rodziców i Położnych "Dobrze Urodzeni". Uniwersytet Medyczny w Białymstoku.

Nelson, A., & Romanis, E. C. (2021). The medicalisation of childbirth and access to homebirth in the UK: COVID-19 and beyond. Medical Law Review, 29(4), 661-687.

Olsen, O., & Clausen, J. A. (2023). Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3).

Parslow, E., & Rayment-Jones, H. (2024). Birth outcomes for women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in midwifery led settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery, 139, 104168.

Quigley, C., Taut, C., Zigman, T., Gallagher, L., Campbell, H., & Zgaga, L. (2016). Association between home birth and breast feeding outcomes: a cross-sectional study in 28,125 mother-infant pairs from Ireland and the UK. BMJ Open, 6(8), e010551.

Reitsma, A., Simioni, J., Brunton, G., Kaufman, K., & Hutton, E. K. (2020). Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine, 21.

Rossi, A. C., & Prefumo, F. (2018). Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 222, 102-108.

Rowe, R., Li, Y., Knight, M., Brocklehurst, P., & Hollowell, J. (2016). Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home in England: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 123(7), 1123-1132.

Said, S. M., & Ibrahim, A. H. (2022). Planned home birth as a safe alternative to hospital birth for low-risk women: A systematic review. Midwifery, 6(1), 61-75.

Sassine, H., Burns, E., Ormsby, S., & Dahlen, H. G. (2021). Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey. Women and Birth, 34(4), 396-404.

Scarf, V. L., Rossiter, C., Vedam, S., Dahlen, H. G., Ellwood, D., Forster, D., … & Homer, C. S. (2018). Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery, 62, 240-255.

Schildberger, B., Riedmann, M., Leitner, H., & Stelzl, P. (2024). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes following hospital transfers of home births and births in midwife-led units in Austria. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 84(03), 264-273.

Stępkowska, J., Bogusz, M., & Stępkowska, K. (2022). Selected aspects of perceiving and experiencing birth-study of men participating in hospital childbirth and men with an experience of home childbirth. Teologia i Moralność, 17(2 (32)), 243-259.

Tilden, E. L., Cheyney, M., Guise, J. M., Emeis, C., Lapidus, J., Biel, F. M., … & Snowden, J. M. (2017). Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 216(4), 403.e1.

Van der Kooy, J., Birnie, E., Denktas, S., Steegers, E. A., & Bonsel, G. J. (2017). Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and perinatal mortality rates, an observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 177.

Wami, G. A., Prémusz, V., Csákány, G. M., Kálmán, K., Vértes, V., & Tamás, P. (2022). Characteristics of homebirth in Hungary: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10461.

Weldegiorgis, S. K., & Feyisa, M. (2021). Why women in Ethiopia give birth at home? A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Women's Health, 1065-1079.

Walker, J. J. (2017). Planned home birth. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 43, 76-86.

World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2018). Infant and young child feeding (WHA71.9). World Health Assembly, Seventy-first session..

Zielinski, R., Ackerson, K., & Kane Low, L. (2015). Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities. International journal of women's health, 361-377.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

EVALUATING THE SAFETY OF HOME BIRTH IN THE MODERN HEALTHCARE CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH. (2025). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 5(4(48). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4363

Most read articles by the same author(s)