DOES SURGICAL APPROACH MATTER? RISK OF UTERINE RUPTURE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN MYOMECTOMY – A CONTEMPORARY REVIEW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5690

Keywords:

Myomectomy, Uterine Rupture, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Pregnancy Outcomes, Uterine Fibroids

Abstract

Background: Uterine rupture is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of pregnancy following surgical procedures involving the uterine corpus, including myomectomy. The increasing number of laparoscopic procedures raises concerns regarding the safety of this approach in subsequent pregnancies.

Objective: To assess the risk of uterine rupture during pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy compared with open abdominal myomectomy based on current literature.

Materials and Methods: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE database, including publications from 2014 to 2025. Cohort studies, population-based analyses, and systematic reviews comparing obstetric outcomes after laparoscopic and open myomectomy were included.

Results: The incidence of uterine rupture after myomectomy is low and does not exceed 1% in most analyses. Most comparative studies did not demonstrate significant differences between surgical approaches. Some population-based studies suggested a potentially higher risk following laparoscopic procedures; however, these findings are limited by methodological constraints.

Conclusions: Current evidence does not confirm a clearly increased risk of uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. The technique of uterine wall reconstruction and appropriate patient selection appear to be more important for obstetric safety than the surgical approach itself.

References

Ginod, P., Badeghiesh, A., Baghlaf, H., & Dahan, M. H. (2025). Pregnancy and delivery outcomes after abdominal vs laparoscopic myomectomy: An evaluation of an American population database. Fertility and Sterility, 123(1), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321

Haviv, E., Schwarzman, P., Bernstein, E. H., Wainstock, T., Weintraub, A. Y., Leron, E., et al. (2022). Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after abdominal vs laparoscopic myomectomy. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35(25), 8219–8225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1967315

Ordás, P., et al. (2022). Comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes in women with uterine leiomyomas after laparoscopic vs abdominal myomectomy. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 9831055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.9831055

Gil, Y., Badeghiesh, A., Suarthana, E., Mansour, F., Capmas, P., & Tulandi, T. (2020). Risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 42(10), 1222–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2020.03.014

Kundu, S., Iwanuk, C., Staboulidou, I., Garcia-Rocha, G. J., Soergel, P., Hertel, H., et al. (2018). Morbidity, fertility and pregnancy outcomes after myoma enucleation by laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 297(4), 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4697-5

Giannini, A., Cuccu, I., D’Auge, T. G., De Angelis, E., Laganà, A. S., Chiantera, V., et al. (2024). The great debate: Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus laparotomic myomectomy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 297, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.03.045

Otten, L. A., Lama, S., Otten, J. W., Winkler, K., Ralser, D. J., Egger, E. K., et al. (2025). Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for uterus-preserving myomectomy: A retrospective analysis on patient-reported outcome, postoperative morbidity and pregnancy outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 311(5), 1359–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07818-2

Tsiampa, E., Tsiampas, K., & Kapogiannis, F. (2024). Perioperative and reproductive outcomes comparison of mini-laparotomy and laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine leiomyomas: A systematic review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 309(3), 821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07168-5

Morales, H. S. G., López, R. R., López, G. G. P., Mondragón, P. J. C., Cortés, D. V., Hernández, H. S., et al. (2022). Surgical approach to uterine myomatosis in patients with infertility: Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 26(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210049

Brenta, A., et al. (2023). Spontaneous uterine rupture after myomectomy in patients during pregnancy: Case series and review of the literature. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

Claeys, J., Hellendoorn, I., Hamerlynck, T., Bosteels, J., Weyers, S., & D’Hooghe, T. (2014). The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecological Surgery, 11, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-014-0842-8

Gambacorti-Passerini, Z., Gimovsky, A. C., Locatelli, A., & Berghella, V. (2016). Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95(7), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12922

Fu, L., Song, Z., Cao, J., Hu, X., Zhao, D., Wang, Q., & Zhang, C. (2023). Risk factors for pregnancy-related uterine rupture following laparoscopic myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 30(5), 650–658.

Furukawa, M., Wada-Hiraike, O., Nariai, M., Ga, H., Takai, R., Enomoto, Y., et al. (2023). Perinatal complications and time to subsequent pregnancy after open, laparoscopic, and hysteroscopic myomectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 49(8), 2734–2742.

Morales-Hernández, F. V., Almada-Balderrama, J. A., Olguín-Ortega, A. A., de Abiega-Franyutti, P., Reyes-Muñoz, E., & Godines-Enriquez, M. S. (2022). Perinatal outcomes in Mexican women with a history of myomectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35(24), 9200–9206.

Komatsu, H., Taniguchi, F., & Harada, T. (2021). Impact of myomectomy on obstetric complications: A large cohort study in Japan. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 304(4), 1005–1012.

Jin, C., Hu, Y., Chen, X. C., et al. (2009). Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 145, 14–21.

Bhave Chittawar, P., Franik, S., Pouwer, A. W., et al. (2014). Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD004638. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3

Koo, Y. J., Lee, J. K., Lee, Y. K., et al. (2015). Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy: A single-center experience and literature review. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 22, 1022–1028.

Coutinho, L. M., Assis, W. A., Spagnuolo-Souza, A., et al. (2022). Uterine fibroids and pregnancy: How do they affect each other? Reproductive Sciences, 29, 2145–2151.

Pérez-Roncero, G. R., López-Baena, M. T., Ornat, L., et al. (2020). Uterine fibroids and preterm birth risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46, 1711–1727.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Milena B. Polak, N. Sara Kuśmierowska, Monika Kuś, Grzegorz Słomkowski, Tymoteusz Białowąs, Dominika Karolak, Magdalena N. Nowak, Konrad Wiśniewski, Daria Valipur Kolti, Kacper Cholewiński, & Agnieszka E. Kierska. (2026). DOES SURGICAL APPROACH MATTER? RISK OF UTERINE RUPTURE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN MYOMECTOMY – A CONTEMPORARY REVIEW. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5690

Most read articles by the same author(s)