URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY: RISK FACTORS, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OPTIONS — A NARRATIVE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5911Keywords:
Urinary Incontinence; Gynecological Surgery; Stress Urinary Incontinence; Pelvic Floor Muscle Training; Quality of LifeAbstract
Introduction and purpose: Urinary incontinence after gynecological surgery remains a relevant clinical problem because it affects physical functioning, emotional well-being, sexual life, and social activity, even when the leakage itself is not severe. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the main types of urinary incontinence after gynecological procedures, preoperative and operative risk factors, diagnostic pathways, conservative and surgical treatment, treatment effectiveness, and the impact of therapy on patient quality of life.
Brief description of the state of knowledge: Stress urinary incontinence is the most frequently reported form after gynecological procedures, but urgency and mixed urinary incontinence are also common, especially after more extensive pelvic surgery. Risk depends on the patient’s baseline pelvic floor status, age, obesity, parity, previous surgery, menopausal status, and the extent of dissection performed during the operation. Diagnostic work-up is based on history, physical examination, voiding diary, urinalysis, post-void residual assessment, and selected use of urodynamics or cystoscopy in more complex cases.
Summary: Management should begin with accurate identification of the predominant symptom pattern and with measures that are proportionate to symptom severity. Supervised pelvic floor muscle training remains first-line treatment, while surgery is mainly reserved for persistent or severe stress urinary incontinence. Operative treatment may provide high rates of improvement, but treatment failure, recurrence, or bothersome new symptoms still occur in a relevant minority of patients and require reassessment and individualized follow-up.
References
Bazi, T., Cote, J. F., Carlson, K. V., Guralnick, M. L., Keefe, D. T., Lacombe, L., et al. (2024). 2024 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Female stress urinary incontinence. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 18(4), E170–E194.
Bogusiewicz, M., Monist, M., Gałązka, I., & Rechberger, T. (2010). Urinary incontinence after obstetric gynecological surgery—Urodynamic studies. Ginekologia Polska, 81(5), 370–373.
Cundiff, G. W., & Komesu, Y. M. (2017). Evaluation and treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(12), 1834–1844.
Davidson, E. R. W., & O’Connell, P. R. (2022, January 3). Urinary and fecal incontinence after GYN surgery. Cancer Network. https://www.cancernetwork.com
Dumoulin, C., Cacciari, L. P., & Hay-Smith, E. J. C. (2018). Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(10), Article CD005654. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4
Forde, J. C., & O’Reilly, B. A. (2024). Female urinary incontinence. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459226/
Lukacz, E. S., Santiago-Lastra, Y., Albo, M. E., & Brubaker, L. (2017). Urinary incontinence in women: A review. JAMA, 318(16), 1592–1604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14221
Lukacz, E. S., Whitcomb, E. L., Lawrence, J. M., Nager, C. W., Contreras, R., & Luber, K. M. (2007). Are sexual activity and satisfaction affected by pelvic floor disorders? Analysis of a community-based survey. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 197(1), 88.e1–88.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.009
Nambiar, A. K., Arlandis, S., Bø, K., Cobussen-Boekhorst, H., Costantini, E., de Heide, M., et al. (2022). European Association of Urology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of female non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. European Urology, 82(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.022
Plotti, F., Chiantera, V., Oleszczuk, A., & Angioli, R. (2008). Urinary incontinence after gynecologic cancer treatment. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87(12), 1332–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802520502
Radosa, J. C., Meyberg-Solomayer, G., Kastl, C., Radosa, M. P., Mavrova, R., Gräber, S., et al. (2016). Urinary incontinence after hysterectomy—Does the type of surgery matter? Ginekologia Polska, 87(2), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.17772/gp/61551
Rortveit, G., Brown, J. S., Thom, D. H., Van Den Eeden, S. K., Creasman, J. M., & Subak, L. L. (2007). Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: Prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109(6), 1396–1403. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000263410.66773.1b
Tennstedt, S. L., Litman, H. J., Zimmern, P., Ghetti, C., Kusek, J. W., Nager, C. W., et al. (2008). Quality of life after surgery for stress incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 19(12), 1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0700-1
Ford, A. A., Rogerson, L., Cody, J. D., Aluko, P., & Ogah, J. A. (2017). Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(7), Article CD006375. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3
Abdel-Fattah, M., Ramsay, I., Pringle, S., Hardwick, C., & Ali, H. (2011). Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in management of women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Urology, 77(5), 1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.022
Salo, H., Kyyrönen, P., Auvinen, A., et al. (2024). Hysterectomy and risk of urinary incontinence: A population-based cohort study. International Continence Society Meeting Abstract. https://icsofficial.org
Tulokas, S., Luukkaala, T., Nummi, A., & Luoto, R. (2022). Preexisting pelvic organ prolapse as a risk factor for outpatient urinary incontinence visits after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 306(3), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06329-1
Salo, H., Luukkaala, T., Tulokas, S., et al. (2025). Associations between hysterectomy and pelvic floor disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 229(3), e1–e15.
Day, K., & Shaker, R. (2023). Continence technologies whitepaper: Informing new engineering science research and design for continence care. Urological Technology and Continence, 12(2), 45–58. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10053025/1
Geller, E. J. (2014). Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. International Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 801–809. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S47827
Women Up Consortium. (2018). Innovative at-home technology for female urinary incontinence: A European multicenter feasibility study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 230, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.003
Subak, L. L., Nygaard, I., Richter, H. E., et al. (2019). The burden of pelvic floor disorders in women: Prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic impact. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(3), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003077
Yeowell, S. L., & Cooper, K. A. (2017). Telehealth-based pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(10), Article e345. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7999
Povedano, M., & de la Torre, A. (2020). Mobile health applications for urinary incontinence management: Current evidence and future directions. Digital Health, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620957701
Johnson, A. C., & Walker, A. C. (2025). Social isolation and self-esteem among women with urinary incontinence: A community-based study. Women’s Health Issues, 35(2), 120–128.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jakub Lewandowski, Denis Myszak, Igor Szlegiel, Oktawia Gwiaździńska, Anita Strzykała
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
