ADVANCES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CHOLESTEATOMA: A CONTEMPORARY REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6097Keywords:
Cholesteatoma; Mastoidectomy; Endoscopic Ear Surgery; DWI MRI; Artificial Intelligence; Bone Resorption; EESSAbstract
Cholesteatoma is a chronic, locally destructive disease of the middle ear characterized by the presence of keratinizing stratified squamous epithelium within the tympanic cavity and mastoid process. Despite its histologically benign nature, it may lead to the destruction of bony structures, damage to the auditory ossicles, and the development of serious intra- and extracranial complications. Its complex pathogenesis and tendency to recur make cholesteatoma a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in both the diagnosis and surgical treatment of cholesteatoma. High-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) sequences enable accurate assessment of primary, residual, and recurrent lesions. Surgical treatment remains the cornerstone of therapy, while advances in endoscopic techniques have improved visualization of anatomical structures and enhanced surgical effectiveness while reducing invasiveness. Artificial intelligence systems are also gaining increasing importance in supporting imaging analysis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making. The aim of this review is to present current advances in the diagnosis and surgical management of cholesteatoma, with particular emphasis on modern imaging techniques, endoscopic ear surgery, and applications of artificial intelligence. The development of these technologies may contribute in the future to improved treatment outcomes and reduced risk of disease recurrence.
References
Jackler, R. K. (1989). The surgical anatomy of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 22(5), 883–896.
Hamed, M. A., Nakata, S., Sayed, R. H., Ueda, H., Badawy, B. S., Nishimura, Y., Kojima, T., Iwata, N., Ahmed, A. R., Dahy, K., Kondo, N., & Suzuki, K. (2016). Pathogenesis and bone resorption in acquired cholesteatoma: Current knowledge and future prospectives. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 9(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2015.01662
Sculerati, N., & Bluestone, C. D. (1989). Pathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 22(5), 859–868.
Lianou, A., Bizoglou, M., Simou, D., & Psychogios, G. (2025). Cholesteatoma: Diagnosis, management and follow-up, and an interesting case report. Folia Medica, 67(4), e140847. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.67.e140847
Sadé, J. (1993). Treatment of cholesteatoma and retraction pockets. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 250(4), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171523
Kazahaya, K., & Potsic, W. P. (2004). Congenital cholesteatoma. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 12(5), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.moo.0000136875.41630.d6
Alfonso, K. P. (2025). Congenital cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 58(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2024.07.023
Richards, E., Muzaffar, J., Cho, W. S., Monksfield, P., & Irving, R. (2022). Congenital mastoid cholesteatoma. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 18(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21450
Donati, G., Somers, T., Havenbergh, T. V., & Falcioni, M. (2023). Congenital retrosigmoid cholesteatoma: Case series and literature review. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 19(5), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.22798
Maxwell, A. K., & Hoff, S. R. (2025). Evaluation of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 58(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2024.07.008
Wei, B., Zhou, P., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, T., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Congenital cholesteatoma clinical and surgical management. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 164, 111401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111401
Song, I. S., Han, W. G., Lim, K. H., Nam, K. J., Yoo, M. H., Rah, Y. C., & Choi, J. (2019). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of congenital cholesteatoma. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 15(3), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2019.6279
Reuven, Y., Raveh, E., Ulanovski, D., Hilly, O., Kornreich, L., & Sokolov, M. (2022). Congenital cholesteatoma: Clinical features and surgical outcomes. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 156, 111098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111098
McGuire, J. K., Wasl, H., Harris, T., Copley, G. J., & Fagan, J. J. (2016). Management of pediatric cholesteatoma based on presentations, complications, and outcomes. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 80, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.041
Lee, J. A., Fuller, S. R., Nguyen, S. A., & Meyer, T. A. (2020). Factors affecting complications and comorbidities in children with cholesteatoma. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 135, 110080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110080
Trinidade, A., & Yung, M. W. (2014). The intra-operative incidence of Fallopian canal dehiscence during surgery for cholesteatoma: A prospective case-control study and review of the literature. Clinical Otolaryngology, 39(3), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12256
Rosito, L. P. S., Canali, I., Teixeira, A., Silva, M. N., Selaimen, F., & Costa, S. S. D. (2019). Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: Prevalence and impact. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 85(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.01.005
Huve, F. D. C., Bauer, J. A., Selaimen, F. A., Silva, M. N. L. D., & Costa, S. S. D. (2023). Experimental cholesteatoma: A comparison between spontaneous and induced models. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 89(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.003
Mitsuhashi, N., Yotsuyanagi, T., Yamashita, K., Kato, S., Kitada, A., & Sakuraba, M. (2026). Cholesteatoma in concha-type microtia. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 113, 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.12.036
Hosoya, M., Kurihara, S., Koyama, H., & Komune, N. (2024). Recent advances in otology: Current landscape and future direction. Auris Nasus Larynx, 51(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2024.02.009
Bächinger, D., Rrahmani, A., Weiss, N. M., Mlynski, R., Huber, A., & Röösli, C. (2021). Evaluating hearing outcome, recidivism and complications in cholesteatoma surgery using the ChOLE classification system. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 278(5), 1365–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06208-z
Baráth, K., Huber, A. M., Stämpfli, P., Varga, Z., & Kollias, S. (2011). Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2052
Ridge, S. E., Shetty, K. R., & Lee, D. J. (2021). Current trends and applications in endoscopy for otology and neurotology. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 7(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.003
Beckmann, S., Mantokoudis, G., Weder, S., Borner, U., Caversaccio, M., & Anschuetz, L. (2022). Endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, (179), 63315. https://doi.org/10.3791/63315
Kurioka, T., & Mizutari, K. (2025). Postoperative hearing outcomes and usefulness of endoscopy-assisted tympanoplasty in pars tensa cholesteatoma. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 29(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792016
Ten Tije, F. A., Pauw, R. J., Bom, S. J. H., Stam, M., Kramer, S. E., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Merkus, P., & Dutch Cholesteatoma Data Consortium. (2022). Postoperative patient reported outcomes after cholesteatoma surgery. Otology & Neurotology, 43(5), e582–e589. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003509
Campos, A., Mata, F., Reboll, R., Peris, M. L., & Basterra, J. (2017). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 274(3), 1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4415-5
Fan, X., Ding, C., & Liu, Z. (2023). Localization evaluation of primary middle ear cholesteatoma with fusion of turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging and high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 47(1), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001389
Lin, M., Sha, Y., Sheng, Y., & Chen, W. (2022). Accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion weighted imaging for the diagnosis of primary middle ear cholesteatoma. Otology & Neurotology, 43(6), e651–e657. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003521
Barbara, M., Covelli, E., Monini, S., Bandiera, G., Filippi, C., Margani, V., Volpini, L., Salerno, G., Romano, A., & Bozzao, A. (2024). Early non-EPI DW-MRI after cholesteatoma surgery. Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal, 103(7), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211042946
Daoudi, H., Levy, R., Baudouin, R., Couloigner, V., Leboulanger, N., Garabédian, E. N., Belhous, K., Boddaert, N., Denoyelle, F., & Simon, F. (2024). Performance of non-EPI DW MRI for pediatric cholesteatoma follow-up. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 170(1), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.398
Bovi, C., Luchena, A., Bivona, R., Borsetto, D., Creber, N., & Danesi, G. (2023). Recurrence in cholesteatoma surgery: What have we learnt and where are we going? A narrative review. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 43(Suppl. 1), S48–S55. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-43-2023-06
Ide, S., Ganaha, A., Tono, T., Goto, T., Nagai, N., Matsuda, K., Azuma, M., & Hirai, T. (2019). Value of DW-MRI in the preoperative evaluation of congenital cholesteatoma. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 124, 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.05.017
Harris, A. T., Mettias, B., & Lesser, T. H. (2016). Pooled analysis of the evidence for open cavity, combined approach and reconstruction of the mastoid cavity in primary cholesteatoma surgery. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 130(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116000013
Palva, T. (1993). Cholesteatoma surgery today. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 18(4), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1993.tb00841.x
Kostadinov, F., Schlegel-Wagner, C., & Linder, T. (2024). A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 281(10), 5189–5198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0
Fallon, K., Chi, D., & Remenschneider, A. (2025). Management of cholesteatoma: Surgical options for disease limited to middle ear/mastoid. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 58(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2024.07.024
Dornhoffer, J. L. (2006). Retrograde mastoidectomy. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 39(6), 1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2006.08.002
Wu, N., Zuo, W., Wang, F., Hou, K., Yang, S., & Hou, Z. (2020). Scutum reconstruction technique and classification in endoscopic middle ear cholesteatoma surgery. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 140(11), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2020.1791953
Kennedy, K. L., Connolly, K. M., Albert, C. L., Goldman, J. L., Cash, E. D., & Severtson, M. A. (2021). Postoperative recurrent cholesteatoma in rural versus urban populations. Otology & Neurotology, 42(4), e459–e463. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003003
Tseng, C. C., Lim, V., & Jyung, R. W. (2023). Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 8(1), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1008
Habib, A. R., Kajbafzadeh, M., Hasan, Z., Wong, E., Gunasekera, H., Perry, C., Sacks, R., Kumar, A., & Singh, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence to classify ear disease from otoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Otolaryngology, 47(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13925
Li, B., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Wang, Y., & Zou, J. (2021). Endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 42(2), 102451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102451
Eroğlu, O., Eroğlu, Y., Yıldırım, M., Karlıdag, T., Çınar, A., Akyiğit, A., Kaygusuz, İ., Yıldırım, H., Keleş, E., & Yalçın, Ş. (2023). Comparison of computed tomography-based artificial intelligence modeling and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cholesteatoma. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 19(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.221004
Eroğlu, O., Eroğlu, Y., Yıldırım, M., Karlıdag, T., Çınar, A., Akyiğit, A., Kaygusuz, İ., Yıldırım, H., Keleş, E., & Yalçın, Ş. (2022). Is it useful to use computerized tomography image-based artificial intelligence modelling in the differential diagnosis of chronic otitis media with and without cholesteatoma? American Journal of Otolaryngology, 43(3), 103395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103395
Ayral, M., Türk, Ö., Can, Ş., Esen, D., Topçu, I., Akil, F., & Temiz, H. (2023). How advantageous is it to use computed tomography image-based artificial intelligence modelling in the differential diagnosis of chronic otitis media with and without cholesteatoma? European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202301_30874
Chen, B., Li, Y., Sun, Y., Sun, H., Wang, Y., Lyu, J., Guo, J., Bao, S., Cheng, Y., Niu, X., Yang, L., Xu, J., Yang, J., Huang, Y., Chi, F., Liang, B., & Ren, D. (2024). A 3D and explainable artificial intelligence model for evaluation of chronic otitis media based on temporal bone computed tomography: Model development, validation, and clinical application. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e51706. https://doi.org/10.2196/51706
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandra Zynkowska, Aleksandra Magdalena Skrzyniarz, Maria Kiełbus , Julia Oziębło, Magdalena Kijowska, Karolina Klusek, Michał Batory, Jakub Jakubowski, Karol Kraska, Nadzieja Krasucka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
How to Cite
