WEARABLE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES AND THE MEDICALIZATION OF EVERYDAY LIFE: A SOCIO-MEDICAL REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6462Keywords:
Wearable Health Technologies; Medicalization; Self-Tracking; Digital Health; Patient-Generated Health Data; Health EquityAbstract
Consumer wearable technologies have evolved from simple activity trackers into multisensor systems that continuously measure physiological and behavioural signals, generating algorithmic assessments of cardiac rhythm, sleep, recovery, stress, and metabolic responses. This trajectory increasingly blurs the boundary between wellness products and medical devices. This narrative socio-medical review examines how wearable health technologies contribute to the medicalization of everyday life by transforming ordinary activities into quantifiable indicators classified as normal, suboptimal, or potentially requiring intervention. Particular attention is given to digital medicalization, the Quantified Self, algorithmic norms, anticipatory risk, responsibilization, patient-generated health data, and the commercial circulation of bodily information. Through a synthesis of clinical and socio-ethical literature, we evaluate the dual nature of wearable tracking. While wearables may support prevention, self-knowledge, chronic-disease management, symptom documentation, and active healthcare participation, continuous monitoring can also intensify health anxiety, encourage compulsive checking, generate false alerts, and reproduce social or algorithmic inequalities. Their ultimate impact depends on device validity, design assumptions, business models, regulatory frameworks, clinical context, and individual user vulnerabilities. The challenge is not to reject digital health monitoring, but to develop technologies and governance practices that support care and autonomy without converting every bodily variation into a medical problem.
References
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS Medicine, 13(2), e1001953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F., & Wang, J. (2019). Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nature Biotechnology, 37(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y
Bayoumy, K., Gaber, M., Elshafeey, A., Mhaimeed, O., Dineen, E. H., Marvel, F. A., Martin, S. S., Muse, E. D., Turakhia, M. P., Tarakji, K. G., Elshazly, M. B., & Ibrahim, N. E. (2021). Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: Where we are and how to move forward. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00522-7
Holzer, R., Bloch, W., & Brinkmann, C. (2022). Continuous glucose monitoring in healthy adults—Possible applications in health care, wellness, and sports. Sensors, 22(5), Article 2030. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22052030
Fuller, D., Colwell, E., Low, J., Orychock, K., Tobin, M. A., Simango, B., Buote, R., Van Heerden, D., Luan, H., Cullen, K., Slade, L., & Taylor, N. G. A. (2020). Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: Systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(9), e18694. https://doi.org/10.2196/18694
Mannhart, D., Lischer, M., Knecht, S., Reichlin, T., Muggli, F., Stöckli, S., Schaer, B. A., Osswald, S., & Conen, D. (2023). Clinical validation of five direct-to-consumer wearable smart devices to detect atrial fibrillation: The BASEL Wearable Study. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 9(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.09.011
Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233
Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Conrad, P. (2005). The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600102
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Lupton, D. (2017). Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1228149
Baumann, M. F., Weinberger, N., Maia, M., & Schmid, K. (2023). User types, psycho-social effects and societal trends related to the use of consumer health technologies: A narrative review. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231163996. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231163996
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800201
Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
Schüll, N. D. (2016). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.47
Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health, 3, 2055207616689509. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509
Wieczorek, M., & Rossmaier, L. W. S. (2023). Healthiness as a virtue: The healthism of mHealth and the challenges to public health. Public Health Ethics, 16(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phad019
Ajana, B. (2020). Personal metrics: Users’ experiences and perceptions of self-tracking practices and data. Social Science Information, 59(4), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018420959522
Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068
Ruckenstein, M. (2022). Charting the unknown: Tracking the self, experimenting with the digital. In M. H. Bruun, R. Douglas-Jones, M. Hasse, B. B. Jensen, & K. H. Morita (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the anthropology of technology (pp. 253–271). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_13
Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6
Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726
Khosla, S., Deak, M. C., Gault, D., Goldstein, C. A., Hwang, D., Kwon, Y., O'Hearn, D., Schutte-Rodin, S., Yurcheshen, M., Rosen, I. M., Kirsch, D. B., Chervin, R. D., Carden, K. A., Ramar, K., Aurora, R. N., Kristo, D. A., Malhotra, R. K., Martin, J. L., Olson, E. J., . . . Rowley, J. A. (2018). Consumer sleep technology: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 14(5), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7128
Schutte-Rodin, S., Deak, M. C., Khosla, S., Goldstein, C. A., Yurcheshen, M., Chiang, A., Gault, D., Kern, J., O'Hearn, D., Ryals, S., Verma, N., Kirsch, D. B., Baron, K., Holfinger, S., Miller, J., Patel, R., Bhargava, S., & Ramar, K. (2021). Evaluating consumer and clinical sleep technologies: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine update. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 17(11), 2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9580
Can, Y. S., Arnrich, B., & Ersoy, C. (2019). Stress detection in daily life scenarios using smart phones and wearable sensors: A survey. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 92, 103139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103139
Vos, G., Trinh, K., Sarnyai, Z., & Rahimi Azghadi, M. (2023). Generalizable machine learning for stress monitoring from wearable devices: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 173, 105026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105026
Paluch, A. E., Bajpai, S., Bassett, D. R., Carnethon, M. R., Ekelund, U., Evenson, K. R., Galuska, D. A., Jefferis, B. J., Kraus, W. E., Lee, I.-M., Matthews, C. E., Omura, J. D., Patel, A. V., Pieper, C. F., Rees-Punia, E., Dallmeier, D., Klenk, J., Whincup, P. H., Dooley, E. E., . . . Fulton, J. E. (2022). Daily steps and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. The Lancet Public Health, 7(3), e219–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00302-9
Ding, D., Nguyen, B., Nau, T., Luo, M., Del Pozo Cruz, B., Dempsey, P. C., Munn, Z., Jefferis, B. J., Sherrington, C., Calleja, E. A., Chong, K. H., Davis, R., Francois, M. E., Tiedemann, A., Biddle, S. J. H., Okely, A., Bauman, A., Ekelund, U., Clare, P., & Owen, K. (2025). Daily steps and health outcomes in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 10(8), e668–e681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00164-1
Watson, N. F., Badr, M. S., Belenky, G., Bliwise, D. L., Buxton, O. M., Buysse, D., Dinges, D. F., Gangwisch, J., Grandner, M. A., Kushida, C., Malhotra, R. K., Martin, J. L., Patel, S. R., Quan, S. F., & Tasali, E. (2015). Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: A joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. Sleep, 38(6), 843–844. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4716
Oliveira, J. I. V., Almeida, R., de Lucena, E. G. P., Tessutti, V., Silva, E. P., & Uchida, M. C. (2026). Innovative health monitoring for wheelchair users: A scoping review of smartwatch applications. Assistive Technology, 38(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2496484
Canali, S., Schiaffonati, V., & Aliverti, A. (2022). Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness. PLOS Digital Health, 1(10), e0000104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000104
Huhn, S., Axt, M., Gunga, H.-C., Maggioni, M. A., Munga, S., Obor, D., Sié, A., Boudo, V., Bunker, A., Sauerborn, R., Bärnighausen, T., & Barteit, S. (2022). The impact of wearable technologies in health research: Scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 10(1), e34384. https://doi.org/10.2196/34384
Armstrong, D. (1995). The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933329
Brandes, A., Stavrakis, S., Freedman, B., Boriani, G., Camm, A. J., Calkins, H., Chen, L. Y., Chen, S.-A., Elvan, A., Desteghe, L., Dobreanu, D., Goette, A., Guo, Y., Hendriks, J. M. L., Hills, M. T., Kalman, J. M., Lane, D. A., Lobban, T., Lobodzinski, S. S., . . . Sanders, P. (2022). Consumer-led screening for atrial fibrillation: Frontier review of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration. Circulation, 146(19), 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058911
Dunn, J., Runge, R., & Snyder, M. (2018). Wearables and the medical revolution. Personalized Medicine, 15(5), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2018-0044
de Zambotti, M., Cellini, N., Goldstone, A., Colrain, I. M., & Baker, F. C. (2019). Wearable sleep technology in clinical and research settings. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51(7), 1538–1557. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001947
Crawford, K., Lingel, J., & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857
Baron, K. G., Abbott, S., Jao, N., Manalo, N., & Mullen, R. (2017). Orthosomnia: Are some patients taking the Quantified Self too far? Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 13(2), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6472
Feng, S., Mäntymäki, M., Dhir, A., & Salmela, H. (2021). How self-tracking and the Quantified Self promote health and well-being: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e25171. https://doi.org/10.2196/25171
Ferguson, T., Olds, T., Curtis, R., Blake, H., Crozier, A. J., Dankiw, K., Dumuid, D., Kasai, D., Nelligan, R. K., Olsen, A., Raniga, P., Maher, C., & Eglitis, E. (2022). Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The Lancet Digital Health, 4(8), e615–e626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00111-X
Guardado, S., Karampela, M., Isomursu, M., & Grundstrom, C. (2024). Use of patient-generated health data from consumer-grade devices by health care professionals in the clinic: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e49320. https://doi.org/10.2196/49320
Mattison, G., Canfell, O., Forrester, D., Dobbins, C., Smith, D., Töyräs, J., & Sullivan, C. (2022). The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(7), e36690. https://doi.org/10.2196/36690
Kenning, C., Bower, P., Small, N., Ali, S. M., Brown, B., Dempsey, K., Mackey, E., McMillan, B., Sanders, C., Serafimova, I., Van der Veer, S. N., Dixon, W. G., & McBeth, J. (2024). Users’ views on the use of a smartwatch app to collect daily symptom data in individuals with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity): A qualitative study. Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity, 14, 26335565231220202. https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565231220202
Lordon, R. J., Mikles, S. P., Kneale, L., Evans, H. L., Munson, S. A., Backonja, U., & Lober, W. B. (2020). How patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes affect patient–clinician relationships: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal, 26(4), 2689–2706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220928184
Jayadeva, S., & Lupton, D. (2025). “A gift and a curse”: The benefits and limitations of self-tracking Long COVID. Information, Communication & Society, 28(16), 2851–2867. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2483834
Haase, C. B., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Brodersen, J. B., Risør, T., & Hoeyer, K. (2023). Data as symptom: Doctors’ responses to patient-provided data in general practice. Social Studies of Science, 53(4), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231164345
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., Cobelli, C., Dassau, E., DeVries, J. H., Donaghue, K. C., Garg, S., Heinemann, L., Hirsch, I. B., Hovorka, R., Jia, W., . . . Phillip, M. (2019). Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care, 42(8), 1593–1603. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0028
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2026). 7. Diabetes technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care, 49(Suppl. 1), S150–S165. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc26-S007
Bogár, B., Pető, Á., Sipos, D., Tóth, A., Szabó, Á., Nagy, V. K., & Merkely, B. (2024). Detection of arrhythmias using smartwatches—A systematic literature review. Healthcare, 12(9), 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090892
Del Din, S., Kirk, C., Yarnall, A. J., Rochester, L., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2021). Body-worn sensors for remote monitoring of Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms: Vision, state of the art, and challenges ahead. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease, 11(Suppl. 1), S35–S47. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-202471
Ryan, J., Edney, S., & Maher, C. (2019). Anxious or empowered? A cross-sectional study exploring how wearable activity trackers make their owners feel. BMC Psychology, 7, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0315-y
Morgan, H. M. (2016). “Pushed” self-tracking using digital technologies for chronic health condition management: A critical interpretive synthesis. Digital Health, 2, 2055207616678498. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616678498
Chowdhary, S., Kawakami, A., Gray, M. L., Suh, J., Olteanu, A., & Saha, K. (2023). Can workers meaningfully consent to workplace wellbeing technologies? In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1489–1500). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594023
Loi, M., Hauser, C., & Christen, M. (2022). Highway to digital surveillance: When are clients coerced to share their data with insurers? Journal of Business Ethics, 175(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04668-1
Hardey, M. (2022). Tracking the trackers: Self-tracking in households as social practice. Digital Health, 8, 20552076221093131. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221093131
Rosman, L., Gehi, A., & Lampert, R. (2020). When smartwatches contribute to health anxiety in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, 1(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.06.004
Rosman, L., Lampert, R., Zhuo, S., Li, Q., Varma, N., Burg, M., Gaffey, A. E., Armbruster, T., & Gehi, A. (2024). Wearable devices, health care use, and psychological well-being in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American Heart Association, 13(15), e033750. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033750
Tran, K.-V., Filippaios, A., Noorishirazi, K., Ding, E., Han, D., Mohagheghian, F., Dai, Q., Mehawej, J., Wang, Z., Lessard, D., Mensah Otabil, E., Hamel, A., Paul, T., Gottbrecht, M. F., Fitzgibbons, T. P., Saczynski, J., Chon, K. H., & McManus, D. D. (2023). False atrial fibrillation alerts from smartwatches are associated with decreased perceived physical well-being and confidence in chronic symptoms management. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 7(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920314
Jahrami, H., Trabelsi, K., Husain, W., Saif, Z., Faris, M. A. I. E., Chtourou, H., Pandi-Perumal, S. R., & Vitiello, M. V. (2024). Prevalence of orthosomnia in a general population sample: A cross-sectional study. Brain Sciences, 14(11), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14111123
Kaplan, D. M., Greenleaf, M., & Lam, W. A. (2023). Wear with care: A call for empirical investigations of adverse outcomes of consumer health wearables. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(3), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.06.014
Predel, C., & Steger, F. (2021). Ethical challenges with smartwatch-based screening for atrial fibrillation: Putting users at risk for marketing purposes? Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 7, 615927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.615927
Briosa e Gala, A., Sharp, A. J., Pope, M. T. B., AlTurki, A., Keene, D., Lambiase, P. D., & Lowe, M. D. (2026). Real-time smartphone alerts during atrial fibrillation episodes with implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices: SMART-ALERT study. Heart Rhythm, 23(4), 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.015
Van Gelder, I. C., Rienstra, M., Bunting, K. V., Casado-Arroyo, R., Caso, V., Crijns, H. J. G. M., Dagres, N., Dilaveris, P., Fauchier, L., Freedman, B., Gorenek, B., Guo, Y., Heidbuchel, H., Hindricks, G., Kotecha, D., Lane, D. A., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Lip, G. Y. H., Lobban, T., . . . Zeppenfeld, K. (2024). 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. European Heart Journal, 45(36), 3314–3414. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2026, January). General wellness: Policy for low risk devices—Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/general-wellness-policy-low-risk-devices
Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digital Health, 3, 2055207617712590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590
Del Busso, L., Brottveit, G., Løkkeberg, S. T., & Gluppe, G. (2022). Women’s embodied experiences of using wearable digital self-tracking health technology: A review of the qualitative research literature. Health Care for Women International, 43(11–12), 1355–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2021.1884682
Lee, Y. J., Lee, J. Y., Cho, J. H., Kang, Y. J., & Choi, J. H. (2025). Performance of consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices compared to polysomnography: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 21(3), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11460
Lomborg, S., Langstrup, H., & Andersen, T. O. (2020). Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope, and anxiety. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720924436. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720924436
Toner, J., Allen-Collinson, J., Jackman, P. C., Jones, L., & Addrison, J. (2023). “I like to run to feel”: Embodiment and wearable mobile tracking devices in distance running. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(6), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2023.2225516
Alpert, J. M., Manini, T., Roberts, M., Prabhakar Kota, N. S., Mendoza, T. V., Solberg, L. M., & Rashidi, P. (2020). Secondary care provider attitudes towards patient generated health data from smartwatches. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0236-4
Brückner, S., Sadare, O., Fesl, S., Scheibe, M., Lang, C., & Gilbert, S. (2025). Attitudes of healthcare professionals and researchers toward wearable and app derived patient generated health data. npj Digital Medicine, 8, 186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01568-4
Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10
Cohen, D. J., Keller, S. R., Hayes, G. R., Dorr, D. A., Ash, J. S., & Sittig, D. F. (2016). Integrating patient-generated health data into clinical care settings or clinical decision-making: Lessons learned from Project HealthDesign. JMIR Human Factors, 3(2), e26. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.5919
Zeng, B., Bove, R., Carini, S., Lee, J. S. J., Pollak, J., Schleimer, E., & Sim, I. (2022). Standardized integration of person-generated data into routine clinical care. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 10(2), e31048. https://doi.org/10.2196/31048
Abdolkhani, R., Gray, K., Borda, A., & DeSouza, R. (2023). Recommendations for the quality management of patient-generated health data in remote patient monitoring: Mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 11, e35917. https://doi.org/10.2196/35917
Hicks, J. L., Althoff, T., Sosic, R., Kuhar, P., Bostjancic, B., King, A. C., Leskovec, J., & Delp, S. L. (2019). Best practices for analyzing large-scale health data from wearables and smartphone apps. npj Digital Medicine, 2, 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0121-1
Ruan, F. Y., Zhang, A., Oh, J. Y., Jin, S., & Jacobson, N. C. (2026). A foundation model for wearable movement data in mental health research. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2026.3694809
Wieczorek, M., O’Brolchain, F., Saghai, Y., & Gordijn, B. (2023). The ethics of self-tracking: A comprehensive review of the literature. Ethics & Behavior, 33(4), 239–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2082969
Capulli, E., Druda, Y., Palmese, F., Lenti, M. V., Cesareo, A., Franchini, F., Corazza, G. R., & Klersy, C. (2025). Ethical and legal implications of health monitoring wearable devices: A scoping review. Social Science & Medicine, 370, 117685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117685
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Gidaris, C. (2019). Surveillance capitalism, datafication, and unwaged labour: The rise of wearable fitness devices and interactive life insurance. Surveillance & Society, 17(1–2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12913
Nagappan, A., Krasniansky, A., & Knowles, M. (2024). Patterns of ownership and usage of wearable devices in the United States, 2020–2022: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e56504. https://doi.org/10.2196/56504
Pan, C.-C., De Santis, K. K., Muellmann, S., Hoffmann, S., Spallek, J., Pedros Barnils, N., Ahrens, W., Zeeb, H., & Schüz, B. (2025). Sociodemographics and digital health literacy in using wearables for health promotion and disease prevention: Cross-sectional nationwide survey in Germany. Journal of Prevention, 46, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-024-00821-y
Yfantidou, S., Sermpezis, P., Vakali, A., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2023). Uncovering bias in personal informatics. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610914
Ummels, D., Beekman, E., Moser, A., Braun, S. M., & Beurskens, A. J. (2020). Patients’ experiences with commercially available activity trackers embedded in physiotherapy treatment: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(23), 3284–3292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1590470
Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M. D., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). What clinicians want: Contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 106, 359–380.
World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
International Medical Device Regulators Forum. (2017, September 21). Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical evaluation (IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41FINAL:2017). https://www.imdrf.org/documents/software-medical-device-samd-clinical-evaluation
Petek, B. J., Al-Alusi, M. A., Moulson, N., Grant, A. J., Besson, C., Guseh, J. S., Wasfy, M. M., Gremeaux, V., Churchill, T. W., & Baggish, A. L. (2023). Consumer wearable health and fitness technology in cardiovascular medicine: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 82(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.054
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Sierant, Malwina Kwaśniewska, Kamila Zmysłowska, Adam Hajdaniak, Jan Mateusz Kiersztyn, Aleksandra Grabowska, Natalia Seńcio, Anna Szatkowska, Klaudia Aleksandra Stadnik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

