ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE: DIAGNOSTIC SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUTOMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5250Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Workflow, Generative AI, Machine Learning, Physician Burnout, Explainable AI (XAI), Implementation ScienceAbstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly moving from theoretical research into daily hospital operations. While AI promises to improve diagnostic speed and reduce administrative burnout, its real-world success depends on how well it integrates into complex clinical workflows. This review evaluates the practical impact of both discriminative and generative AI on modern healthcare delivery.
Methods: We conducted a targeted literature search using PubMed and Semantic Scholar (via Consensus AI) for research published between January 2018 and March 2026. We structured this work as a critical narrative review to focus specifically on the practical challenges and successes of AI in real-world hospital settings. After screening for clinical relevance and the presence of deployment data, we selected 21 peer-reviewed articles for final inclusion.
Results: The evidence shows that discriminative AI significantly improves speed in acute care, particularly in sepsis forecasting and stroke triage. Newer models are also showing success in evaluating surgical risks from ECGs and tracking traumatic brain injuries. However, these tools often face challenges like "alert fatigue" and data bias. On the administrative side, generative AI—such as ambient clinical scribes—is successfully reducing documentation time and improving billing accuracy. We found that the success of these tools depends on "Human-in-the-Loop" models and mathematical explainability frameworks, like SHAP values, which help doctors understand and trust AI decisions.
Conclusion: AI is becoming a necessary requirement for modern medicine, not just an optional upgrade. By offloading high-volume data tasks to machines, AI can help return the physician’s focus to direct patient care. Future success depends on using protocols that ensure algorithmic transparency and prevent automation bias, ensuring the doctor remains the final authority in clinical decisions.
References
Adams, R., Henry, K. E., Sridharan, A., Soleimani, H., Zhan, A., Nielson, J. A., ... Saria, S. (2022). Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis. Nature Medicine, 28(7), 1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0
Baldwin, A., Lipitz-Snyderman, A., Goyal, S., Kuperman, G., Stetson, P. D., Chimonas, S., ... Damstrom, M. (2025). Early insights into the impact of an ambient AI scribe solution on clinical documentation to reduce clinician burnout in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(16_suppl), Article e13722. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.e13722
Bera, K., Braman, N., Gupta, A., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2019). Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 16(11), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7
Berlyand, Y., Raja, A. S., Dorner, S. C., Prabhakar, A. M., Sonis, J. D., ... Yun, B. J. (2018). How artificial intelligence could transform emergency department operations. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36(8), 1515–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.017
Bhuyan, S. S., Sateesh, V., Mukul, N., Galvankar, A., Mahmood, A., Nauman, M., Rai, A., Bordoloi, K., Basu, U., & Samuel, J. (2025). Generative AI in healthcare: Opportunities for clinical excellence and revenue cycle management. Journal of Medical Systems, 49, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02136-1
Challen, R., Denny, J., Pitt, M., Gompels, L., Edwards, T., & Tsaneva-Atanasova, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., ... Mahmood, F. (2023). Algorithm fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 7(6), 719–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8
Choi, H. M., Kim, Y., Kim, J., Park, J., Lee, J. H., Yoon, Y. E., Oh, I. Y., Song, I. A., & Cho, Y. (2026). Artificial intelligence-enhanced ECG score for perioperative risk assessment in non-cardiac surgery. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag006
Duggan, M. J., Gervase, J., Schoenbaum, A., Hanson, W., Howell, J. T., III, Sheinberg, M., & Johnson, K. B. (2025). Clinician experiences with ambient scribe technology to assist with documentation burden and efficiency. JAMA Network Open, 8(2), Article e2460637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60637
Espinoza-Vinces, C., Martínez, M. C., & Irimia, P. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship. The Journal of Headache and Pain, 26, Article 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02143-8
Heeralal, V. T., Chadee, S. E., Ilyaev, B., Ilyaev, R., & Ilyayeva, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in stroke care: A narrative review of diagnostic, predictive, and workflow applications. Cureus, 17(9), Article e93430. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93430
Koksal, D., Govindarajan, A., Gonuguntla, H. K., Nayci, S., Cordova, R., Zidan, M. H., McCutcheon, S., Saha, A., Kantharaju, P., Sen, S., Agrawal, R., & Wulandari, L. (2026). Evaluation of an artificial intelligence defined lung nodule malignancy score in incidental pulmonary nodules: The CREATE study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 4(1), Article 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2026.100335
Lu, Y., Jin, J., Zhang, H., Lu, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Liang, Y., Tian, S., Zhao, Y., & Fan, H. (2024). Traumatic brain injury: Bridging pathophysiological insights and precision treatment strategies. Neural Regeneration Research, 21(3), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01398
Micek, M. A., Arndt, B., Tuan, W. J., Trowbridge, E., Dean, S. M., Lochner, J., ... Pandhi, N. (2020). Physician burnout and timing of electronic health record use. ACI Open, 4(1), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401815
Rahrisch, A., Braun, J., Ganter, M. T., Roche, T. R., Spahn, D. R., Tscholl, D. W., & Kaserer, A. (2026). Generative AI in preanesthetic consultations: Effects on efficiency, documentation workload, quality, and physician-patient interaction: A simulation trial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 110, Article 112163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112163
Sezgin, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Complementing, not replacing, doctors and healthcare providers. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231186520
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., ... Natarajan, P. (2023). Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
Sinsky, C., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., ... Blatz, A. (2016). Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0961
Sogancioglu, E., Calli, E., van Ginneken, B., van Leeuwen, K. G., & Murphy, K. (2021). Deep learning for chest X-ray analysis: A survey. Medical Image Analysis, 72, Article 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102125
Watson, G. L., Staples, G., Carver, R., Bhargava, A., López-Espina, C., Schmalz, L., ... Antkowiak, P. S. (2026). Interpretability of an FDA-authorized AI/ML sepsis diagnostic tool improved by SHAP values. JAMIA Open, 9(1), Article ooag020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag020
Yasaka, K., & Abe, O. (2018). Deep learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: Current applications and future directions. PLOS Medicine, 15(11), Article e1002707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002707
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Żak, Monika Stępińska, Marta Omiecińska, Alicja Maciejewska, Maja Kaczor, Weronika Trynkiewicz, Zuzanna Rybka, Emilia Lenkiewicz, Karolina Dąbrowska, Jakub Winiarczyk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

