THE RISE OF DIGITAL SELF-DIAGNOSIS: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND ITS SOCIAL AND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IMPLICATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5252

Keywords:

Digital Health, Self-Diagnosis, Symptom Checkers, Artificial Intelligence, Mhealth, Wearable Devices

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital health technologies has transformed how people seek, interpret, and use medical information. Tools supporting self-diagnosis—such as online symptom checkers, AI-based chatbots, wearable biosensors, and mobile health applications—are now widely used across healthcare systems. This review examines the clinical, ethical, and societal implications of these developments.

A structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library identified peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 evaluating consumer-oriented diagnostic technologies. Eligible studies addressed diagnostic performance, behavioral outcomes, regulation, health literacy, and equity. Due to methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively.

Evidence suggests that digital self-diagnosis tools provide several benefits, including improved access to health information, earlier symptom assessment, triage support, and greater patient engagement. These advantages may be particularly important in resource-limited settings and during periods of healthcare system strain. However, notable concerns remain. Diagnostic accuracy varies considerably, and triage advice may be overly cautious or occasionally inappropriate. Additional risks include increased health anxiety, exposure to misinformation, data privacy issues, and the potential to exacerbate existing social inequalities. Moreover, the current evidence base is uneven, with limited real-world validation and insufficient research on long-term behavioral and professional impacts.

Digital self-diagnosis represents a lasting structural change rather than a temporary trend. Its effective integration into healthcare systems will require stronger regulatory oversight, greater investment in digital health literacy, and interdisciplinary research addressing clinical effectiveness, ethical governance, and equity. Careful management is necessary to ensure that technological innovation strengthens—rather than undermines—the quality and fairness of medical care.

References

Aboueid, S., Liu, R. H., Desta, B. N., Chaurasia, A., & Ebrahim, S. (2019). The use of artificially intelligent self-diagnosing digital platforms by the general public: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7(2), e13445. https://doi.org/10.2196/13445

Chambers, D., Cantrell, A. J., Johnson, M., Preston, L., Baxter, S. K., Booth, A., & Turner, J. (2019). Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: Systematic review. BMJ Open, 9(8), e027743. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743

Cohen, A. B., Mathews, S. C., Dorsey, E. R., Bates, D. W., & Safavi, K. (2020). Direct-to-consumer digital health. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(4), e163–e165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30057-1

Cordeiro, J. V. (2021). Digital technologies and data science as health enablers: An outline of appealing promises and compelling ethical, legal, and social challenges. Frontiers in Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.647897

Farnood, A., Johnston, B., & Mair, F. S. (2020). A mixed methods systematic review of the effects of patient online self-diagnosing in the “smart-phone society” on the healthcare professional-patient relationship and medical authority. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01243-6

Fiske, A., Buyx, A., & Prainsack, B. (2020). The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from northern Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 260, 113174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113174

Hollis, C., Morriss, R., Martin, J., Amani, S., Cotton, R., Denis, M., & Lewis, S. (2015). Technological innovations in mental healthcare: Harnessing the digital revolution. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(4), 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612

Jutel, A., & Lupton, D. (2015). Digitizing diagnosis: A review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process. Diagnosis, 2(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2014-0068

Lucas, H. (2015). New technology and illness self-management: Potential relevance for resource-poor populations in Asia. Social Science & Medicine, 145, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.008

Lupton, D., & Jutel, A. (2015). “It’s like having a physician in your pocket!” A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004

Majumder, S., & Deen, M. J. (2019). Smartphone sensors for health monitoring and diagnosis. Sensors, 19(9), 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092164

Meskó, B. (2022). COVID-19’s impact on digital health adoption: The growing gap between a technological and a cultural transformation. JMIR Human Factors, 9(3), e38926. https://doi.org/10.2196/38926

Meskó, B., Drobni, Z., Bényei, É., Gergely, B., & Győrffy, Z. (2017). Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. mHealth, 3, 38–38. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.07

Millenson, M. L., Baldwin, J. L., Zipperer, L., & Singh, H. (2018). Beyond Dr. Google: The evidence on consumer-facing digital tools for diagnosis. Diagnosis, 5(3), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0009

Mitchell, M., & Kan, L. (2019). Digital technology and the future of health systems. Health Systems & Reform, 5(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1583040

Morton, K., Dennison, L., May, C., Murray, E., Little, P., McManus, R. J., & Yardley, L. (2017). Using digital interventions for self-management of chronic physical health conditions: A meta-ethnography review of published studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(4), 616–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.019

van Olmen, J. (2022). The promise of digital self-management: A reflection about the effects of patient-targeted e-health tools on self-management and wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031360

Petersen, A., Tanner, C., & Munsie, M. (2019). Citizens’ use of digital media to connect with health care: Socio-ethical and regulatory implications. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 23(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459319847505

Petrakaki, D., Hilberg, E., & Waring, J. (2018). Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients’ conduct through technological self-care. Social Science & Medicine, 213, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.043

Radionova, N., Ög, E., Wetzel, A.-J., Rieger, M. A., & Preiser, C. (2023). Impacts of symptom checkers for laypersons’ self-diagnosis on physicians in primary care: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e39219. https://doi.org/10.2196/39219

Robertson, N., Polonsky, M., & McQuilken, L. (2014). Are my symptoms serious Dr Google? A resource-based typology of value co-destruction in online self-diagnosis. Australasian Marketing Journal, 22(3), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.009

Seyhan, A. A., & Carini, C. (2019). Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care? Journal of Translational Medicine, 17(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1864-9

Shegog, R., Braverman, L., & Hixson, J. D. (2020). Digital and technological opportunities in epilepsy: Toward a digital ecosystem for enhanced epilepsy management. Epilepsy & Behavior, 102, 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106663

Wetzel, A.-J., Koch, R., Preiser, C., Müller, R., Klemmt, M., Ranisch, R., Ehni, H.-J., Wiesing, U., Rieger, M. A., Henking, T., & Joos, S. (2022). Ethical, legal, and social implications of symptom checker apps in primary health care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an interdisciplinary mixed methods study. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(5), e34026. https://doi.org/10.2196/34026

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Omiecińska, M., Stępińska, M., Maciejewska, A., Kaczor, M., Trynkiewicz, W., Rybka, Z., Żak, J., Lenkiewicz, E., Dąbrowska, K., & Winiarczyk , J. (2026). THE RISE OF DIGITAL SELF-DIAGNOSIS: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND ITS SOCIAL AND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IMPLICATIONS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 1(2(50). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5252

Most read articles by the same author(s)