ALGORITHMIC FEEDS, MISINFORMATION, AND CIVIC TRUST AMONG YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL MEDIA INFORMATION ENVIRONMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5344Keywords:
Algorithmic Feeds, Misinformation, Civic Trust, Youth, Young Adults, Social MediaAbstract
This review examines how algorithmically curated social media environments shape misinformation exposure and civic trust among youth and young adults. The reviewed literature spans longitudinal surveys, field experiments, behavioral tracking, qualitative interviews, review papers, and conceptual studies. Taken together, it shows that the civic consequences of social media are not determined by platform use alone. They depend on the interaction of ranking logics, peer networks, source credibility, corrective infrastructures, and the developmental needs of younger users. Three major patterns emerge. First, engagement-driven and homophilous information environments intensify selective exposure and support the diffusion of misinformation, especially when content is emotionally charged, identity-affirming, and repeatedly encountered within tightly clustered networks. Second, exposure to verified and professionally produced news on social platforms can improve current affairs knowledge, belief accuracy, and trust in news under specific conditions. Third, youth and young adults experience social media as both a civic resource and a civic risk: it supports belonging, sociopolitical learning, digital organizing, and collective action, yet it can also heighten institutional distrust, vicarious trauma, harassment, burnout, and radicalization pressures. The review argues that civic trust is best understood as a dynamic outcome of social media information environments rather than a simple by-product of platform use. It concludes that democratic resilience among younger publics is more likely when platforms reward informational quality and context, when institutions communicate credibly, and when youth-centered media literacy supports critical but constructive participation.
References
Altay, S., Hoes, E., & Wojcieszak, M. (2025). Following news on social media boosts knowledge, belief accuracy and trust. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(9), 1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02205-6
Beauvais, C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it? Joint Bone Spine, 89(4), 105371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371
Callahan, R. M., Rico, J., Obenchain, K. M., Ochoa, C., & De Santos-Quezada, A. (2024). Civic identity: Media, belonging, & Latiné youth in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Identities, 31(6), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2024.2367895
Dayrit, J. C. S., Albao, B. T., & Cleofas, J. V. (2022). Savvy and woke: Gender, digital profile, social media competence, and political participation in gender issues among young Filipino netizens. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, Article 966878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.966878
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
Drolsbach, C. P., Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2024). Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media. PNAS Nexus, 3(7), pgae217. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae217
Lasser, J., & Poechhacker, N. (2025). Designing social media content recommendation algorithms for societal good. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1548(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15359
Malorni, A., & Wilf, S. (2025). Unpacking social media’s role in sociopolitical development amidst the dual pandemics: Perspectives of marginalized adolescent organizers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35(3), e70048. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70048
Mont’Alverne, C., Arguedas, A. R., Banerjee, S., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). The electoral misinformation nexus: How news consumption, platform use, and trust in news influence belief in electoral misinformation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(SI), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae019
Rastogi, S., & Bansal, D. (2022). Disinformation detection on social media: An integrated approach. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(28), 40675–40707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13129-y
West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021). Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(15), e1912444117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117
Wilf, S., Wray-Lake, L., & Saavedra, J. A. (2023). Youth civic development amid the pandemic. Current Opinion in Psychology, 52, 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101627
Wilf, S., & Wray-Lake, L. (2024). “That’s how revolutions happen”: Psychopolitical resistance in youth’s online civic engagement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 39(4), 827–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211062121
Zhang, Y., Tian, Z., Zhou, Z., Huang, J., & Zhu, A. Y. F. (2023). Intention to consume news via personal social media network and political trust among young people: The evidence from Hong Kong. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1065059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065059
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiktor Czyżewski, Michał Babicz, Kamil Chudzicki, Agata Słoma, Katarzyna Rosa, Dominik Szydełko, Martyna Szymczyk, Paweł Żurek, Anna Szot, Jagoda Pałubska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

